Traditionalists vs Feminists

This thread may be new, but it has "dumpster fire" written all over it.
 
I often differ with you, L, but that was too funny not to laugh at....and there is a kernel or two of truth to it. Rad fem and trad cons are both members of the closest thing that America has to a fascist movement.
 
I often differ with you, L, but that was too funny not to laugh at....and there is a kernel or two of truth to it. Rad fem and trad cons are both members of the closest thing that America has to a fascist movement.

The difference is that there are tens of millions of traditionalist conservatives and maybe 1,000 radical feminists.
 
The difference is that there are tens of millions of traditionalist conservatives and maybe 1,000 radical feminists.

Given voting patterns, that's probably true, though the rad fems often exercise disproportionate power in key sectors (academia, media, etc.).
 
Serf and Terf Radfems certainly have a lot in common with Conservative Christian Traditionalists...
*gag*
 
the woman in the first picture is called a radfem because she did what people like LT are always daring women to do .. argue back face to face with the MRA

her reward?

literally hundreds of rape and death threats

if i received those for speaking publicly to a man.. i'd become pretty radical myself
 
name one


put up or shut up

Hey, now, there's no call for that. I'm just telling you the impression that I have. I doubt that most of them will own up to being rad fems, anyway. They'll pretend to be moderate ones instead.
 
Hey, now, there's no call for that. I'm just telling you the impression that I have. I doubt that most of them will own up to being rad fems, anyway. They'll pretend to be moderate ones instead.

That's not what you said.. you made a claim.. and i will quote

Given voting patterns, that's probably true, though the rad fems often exercise disproportionate power in key sectors (academia, media, etc.).


that's not an impression, that is you stating something

I called you on it

now that you cant actually support your initial claim... you now claim " oh , well maybe they're not rads, but they secretly are.. whoever the be"

classy
 
Oh, now I see who that woman is.

Hint: Not a radfem.

To be honest, it's hard to say for sure who is and isn't a rad fem. LJ says that she is and you say that she is not. I'm under the impression that most rad fems pose as moderates, hiding the conspiracy and the degree of their secretive power. Still, they're not the Masons. They'll slip now and then. I can't speak to this case, however.

I'm suspicious of a movement that claims to preach equality and then identifies primarily with one sex over the other.
 
Weird how feminists would identify with women

seriously, you cant be that dumb

The very name is itself a sign of the problem. If they truly wish to be about equality, they should accept that men have issues that disenfranchise them, too, and adopt a new name.

As for the rest of it, yes, I maintain that there is a sinister element within the women's movement, perhaps 10% of it, tops. One that is up to no good.
 
To be honest, it's hard to say for sure who is and isn't a rad fem. LJ says that she is and you say that she is not. I'm under the impression that most rad fems pose as moderates, hiding the conspiracy and the degree of their secretive power. Still, they're not the Masons. They'll slip now and then. I can't speak to this case, however.

I'm suspicious of a movement that claims to preach equality and then identifies primarily with one sex over the other.

Identifying with one sex while supporting equality is pretty much necessary when there's institutional oppression.

As for RadFem... it's pretty specific, and does not in any way represent modern third wave feminism.
 
I'm not saying that all or even most feminists are radicals, but I believe that there are secret radicals. That is my assertion here, and of course, it's hard to prove. It's secret. They're not going to say something that would reduce their access to power.

But believe what you wish.
 
Identifying with one sex while supporting equality is pretty much necessary when there's institutional oppression.

As for RadFem... it's pretty specific, and does not in any way represent modern third wave feminism.

Well, that tends to make it necessary for men to have a movement to address their issues as well, since they're not going to gravitate toward one that is not about them.
 
The very name is itself a sign of the problem. If they truly wish to be about equality, they should accept that men have issues that disenfranchise them, too, and adopt a new name.

As for the rest of it, yes, I maintain that there is a sinister element within the women's movement, perhaps 10% of it, tops. One that is up to no good.

you really dont know what feminism is ,... that's your first problem


secondly.. feminists do accept have issues that disenfranchise them.. mainly by roles dictated to them by society

you would know this if you knew anything feminism... but you dont.. because you dont


sinister element? really?

i literally defied you to name one of these radfems that have soooo much power in the academic world, the media, etcetera and you came up blank

the reason why people think feminism is so evil ..it's because most of them are as willfully ignorant as you
 
Well, that tends to make it necessary for men to have a movement to address their issues as well, since they're not going to gravitate toward one that is not about them.

The issues that MRA's bring up are addressed by dissolving the patriarchy - which is of course what feminists want.
 
I'm not saying that all or even most feminists are radicals, but I believe that there are secret radicals. That is my assertion here, and of course, it's hard to prove. It's secret. They're not going to say something that would reduce their access to power.

But believe what you wish.

do you also believe in the Illimunati, the Templars and sentient nachos controlling the banks?
 
you really dont know what feminism is ,... that's your first problem


secondly.. feminists do accept have issues that disenfranchise them.. mainly by roles dictated to them by society

you would know this if you knew anything feminism... but you dont.. because you dont


sinister element? really?

i literally defied you to name one of these radfems that have soooo much power in the academic world, the media, etcetera and you came up blank

the reason why people think feminism is so evil ..it's because most of them are as willfully ignorant as you

And it's funny because I think I could name 5 off the top of my head. But of course I'm not talking out of my ass.
 
Back
Top