Proof that AJ's lying through his teeth - again

I have never created an alt with the design of covering up the past, in fact I proudly tell people about my alts. I change alts when my life undergoes some sort of major change. That is all it represents, I want people to know it's A_J because I've known some of them since late 1999...

You routinely jettison older inconvenient userids when the myriad multiple conflicting opinions you would espouse became too difficult to explain away. You've solved that problem lately by A) never going on record with your own opinion (hiding behind the words of others, i.e. "plausible deniability") and B) continually denying you said what you said, calling other people "liars" for drawing attention to your words repeatedly until they give up.

So, again, you are lying, clouded by your emotion.

No, she told the truth, and you refuse to accept responsibility for your words.

Once again, you bring great shame upon yourself, your family, your tribe, the USMC and Good Ole Sensei K.
 
Heh.

Unless we write a political science essay, Butters accused AJ of being a racist despite the fact she never wrote that, and AJ did not describe a population as subhuman despite writing that they were less than human.

Where do we turn in our blue books?
 
Heh.

Unless we write a political science essay, Butters accused AJ of being a racist despite the fact she never wrote that, and AJ did not describe a population as subhuman despite writing that they were less than human.

Where do we turn in our blue books?

Keeping in mind that (situational) Native American AJ never had an original thought in his life, where oh were did he get the notion that certain people with a documented history of failure as a civilization were "less than human" and undeserving of our sympathies?

Oh yeah, that was his idol Ayn Rand pontificating on the Native American culture in America.

Such irony.
 
Look at the poor logic.

Instead of explaining their position they caricature classic Liberalism in order to call it ridiculous and then turn around and say that any further response is unnecessary because I caricature modern Liberalism. I challenge any and all of you to give us a definition or outline of what "Liberalism" instead of merely attacking things that you define as "Not Liberal."

You get bonus points if you can leave me and what you think I believe out of your reply.

I really have my doubts as to whether or not any of you are willing, or able to do so.

Sorry, I'm busy right now trying to explain to someone else that hobbits aren't real.
 
Keeping in mind that (situational) Native American AJ never had an original thought in his life, where oh were did he get the notion that certain people with a documented history of failure as a civilization were "less than human" and undeserving of our sympathies?

Oh yeah, that was his idol Ayn Rand pontificating on the Native American culture in America.

Such irony.

Fuck.

I had never heard of that.

"[The Native Americans] didn't have any rights to the land and there was no reason for anyone to grant them rights which they had not conceived and were not using.... What was it they were fighting for, if they opposed white men on this continent? For their wish to continue a primitive existence, their "right" to keep part of the earth untouched, unused and not even as property, just keep everybody out so that you will live practically like an animal, or maybe a few caves above it. Any white person who brought the element of civilization had the right to take over this continent."

http://en.m.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Ayn_Rand

Well, that's interesting twist.
 
Hear it straight from the horse's mouth HERE

The whole 4 minute video is fun, but fast-forward to the 3:00 mark to hear Ayn tell us what she believes about those Native American "savages".

Dude, Ayn Rand was fucked up. Beyond fucked up. I've referenced passages of her books that encapsulated her feelings on women and the poor, only to have fans of her get flustered and claim she didn't say those things. To which I've had to say "Direct quote. Verbatim. Fuck your context." I don't dispute that she was charismatic, but her "circle" was little more than a cult minus the actual religion. She was L. Ron Hubbard with a vagina.
 
Dude, Ayn Rand was fucked up. Beyond fucked up. I've referenced passages of her books that encapsulated her feelings on women and the poor, only to have fans of her get flustered and claim she didn't say those things. To which I've had to say "Direct quote. Verbatim. Fuck your context." I don't dispute that she was charismatic, but she was basically L. Ron Hubbard with a vagina.

Except Hubbard knew it was all a big joke.
 
Dude, Ayn Rand was fucked up. Beyond fucked up. I've referenced passages of her books that encapsulated her feelings on women and the poor, only to have fans of her get flustered and claim she didn't say those things. To which I've had to say "Direct quote. Verbatim. Fuck your context." I don't dispute that she was charismatic, but her "circle" was little more than a cult minus the actual religion. She was L. Ron Hubbard with a vagina.

You can see why folks like AJ idolize her.
 
You can see why folks like AJ idolize her.

True story: a while back, my girlfriend at the time tried to convince me to go back and reread her. I hadn't touched Rand since the "The Fountainhead" back in high school, and even that had made me start to think I wasn't as conservative as I'd been raised to believe. Said girlfriend lent me "We The Living," stating that it wasn't as political as some of the others, and so, fuck it, I figured I should read it just to be able to argue it.

You know, I get that the actions of the Bolsheviks were pretty ugly, but Rand's way of writing about them struck me as the most tone-deaf thing imaginable. She made her Bolsheviks a caricature of undeserving proles, completely ignored any of the history that led to their rise, and painted the aristocracy of Russia as I imagine Louis XVI might have painted the aristocracy in France. I remember thinking of the line about history and those who fail to understand it. Plus, and this should of course be obvious, the prose was awful.

I made it maybe fifty pages, and we thankfully broke up not long afterward.
 
wat is my hero. i don't want to have his babies, but i want to practice conceiving them.

the rest of you suck dirty, sweaty monkey balls. with fleas.
 
wat is my hero. i don't want to have his babies, but i want to practice conceiving them.

the rest of you suck dirty, sweaty monkey balls. with fleas.

Wouldn't crabs be more likely? Also, thanks for ruining my morning eggs.
 
Wouldn't crabs be more likely? Also, thanks for ruining my morning eggs.

monkeys get lice, not crabs.

though, curiously, human crabs are more closely related to gorilla lice than to human head lice. remnants of a primitive, bestial bj? the dirty fuckers!
 
monkeys get lice, not crabs.

though, curiously, human crabs are more closely related to gorilla lice than to human head lice. remnants of a primitive, bestial bj? the dirty fuckers!

So now you know. AND KNOWING IS HALF THE BATTLE!™
 
True story: a while back, my girlfriend at the time tried to convince me to go back and reread her. I hadn't touched Rand since the "The Fountainhead" back in high school, and even that had made me start to think I wasn't as conservative as I'd been raised to believe. Said girlfriend lent me "We The Living," stating that it wasn't as political as some of the others, and so, fuck it, I figured I should read it just to be able to argue it.

You know, I get that the actions of the Bolsheviks were pretty ugly, but Rand's way of writing about them struck me as the most tone-deaf thing imaginable. She made her Bolsheviks a caricature of undeserving proles, completely ignored any of the history that led to their rise, and painted the aristocracy of Russia as I imagine Louis XVI might have painted the aristocracy in France. I remember thinking of the line about history and those who fail to understand it. Plus, and this should of course be obvious, the prose was awful.

I made it maybe fifty pages, and we thankfully broke up not long afterward.

So what you're really saying is unless you start your posts with "true story," you're lying. Finally, someone back on topic. Well done.
 
I thought I should post at least one time in this thread in order to maintain my Lit GB Popularity, seems all the popular folk are posting here.

Now carry on.
 
Where did I ever say that outside of this one circumstance.

You see, you continue to lie and simply make things up in order to keep up the pretense that you are on some sort oh higher ground, but other than public lamentation, you did nothing for Haiti and soon forgot about it in any context other than, "I don't like that guy."

Except that she didn't lie, you did.

You can deflect and deny all you want. You can repeat your lie over and over again which doesn't change the fact that you said what she claimed.
 
Back
Top