evesdream
perfect fifth
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2002
- Posts
- 5,716
You are all delicious, but I'm not Hall-worthy. Nominees should contribute substantively, or uniquely, to the Lit experience. The archetypes, if you will. When I introduced lavender to the site, she enthusiastically blasted past me to become the passionate law student who would discuss politics and the law with breathtaking enthusiasm. So I don't have that angle going for me. I've posted a couple of bit pics, but again, there are far better examples around here, both in quality of images and subject matter. Garnate has the enviable rack, backed with verve and hilarious videos and Q&As (her videos alone should qualify her for the next round of nominees); y = mx + b posts the most erotic self portraits, bar none. Phelia is a far more creative writer; she writes her posts from the back of a unipegasus flying amid the rainbows. Problem Child could write at length, and compel people to hang on his every word, even when he was directly insulting them. InternationalFunBoy is our Willy Wonka, charging in with his first post with a double-flip and fireworks, and making all the girls swoon. Dr Oliver Klozoff was our resident unflappable doctor-in-training. Lancecastor didn't get my vote this round, as I only had one to cast, but I wholly adore his position as the board contrarian. Highly intelligent, he pulls masterfully at strings. Seriously, this is fun! There have been scads of fab people around here.
I appreciate your modesty, (and your reading list above), though I would never wish GB Hall of Fame and attendant pollstery on anyone I really liked.