Officer Wilson Has Injuries

[4est_4est_Gump]

Facts no longer matter, which is what I said on Day One.

The only thing that matters is the story. The story fits the memorized meme and once adopted and accepted by the consensus nothing will change the story and nothing will shake the foundations of faith. So what if the document is forged, the story is true.

This is another victory for the Democrat party. All across this nation they have preserved and stoked the embers of division and hate and they sit waiting for some gasoline in order to produce a "See, we told you so moment" the self fulfilling prophecy of a polity of division, of good and bad, of victims and oppressors.

The only true victims in this passion play are the True Believers and the only true oppressors are those who created the backdrop and wrote the story in order to muster and maintain political power.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

That sounds like something your cow of a wife would say to reassure your tiny dick.

It figures you'd come crawling out from your rock for this. You're fucking pathetic. Go back to reading your David Barton books like the fucking piece of shit you are.

My wife says your pecker is small and pink like a rosebud.

 

[miles]

Per Intelihealth:

Indirect orbital floor fracture ("blowout fracture"). This occurs when the bony rim of the eye remains intact, but the paper thin floor of the eye socket cracks or ruptures. This can cause a small hole in the floor of the eye socket that can trap parts of the eye muscles and surrounding structures. The injured eye may not move normally in its socket, which can cause double vision. Most blowout fractures are caused by an impact to the front of the eye from something bigger than the eye opening, such as a baseball, a fist or an automobile dashboard.

Approximately 2.5 million traumatic eye injuries, including eye socket fractures, occur each year in the United States. About 85% of these injuries happen by accident, during contact sports, at work, in car crashes or while doing home repair projects. About 15% are caused by violent assaults. Men suffer from traumatic eye injuries about four times more often than women do. The average age of the injured person is about 30. The source of the injury is usually a blunt object -- baseball, hammer, rock, piece of lumber -- and the most frequent place of injury is the home. At one time, eye injuries were common in motor vehicle accidents, usually when a victim's face struck the dashboard. Such eye injuries have decreased dramatically because more cars have airbags, and most states have laws mandating the use of seat belts.

 

[RobDownSouth]

CNN: NO ORBITAL BLOWOUT, NO EYE INJURY FOR OFFICER WILSON

Read it and weep, wingnuts: No break, no tear....NOTHING

#DiscreditedWingnutTalkingPoints

 

[about_average]

Wow, hearsay was wrong? Imagine that.
though I can't find anything on CNN.Com about it so....

 

[Que]

Don Lemon reports that Wilson did go to the hospital with a swollen face, but x-rays came back negative on a broken or torn eye socket.

Read more: http://therightscoop.com/cnn-report...altercation-with-michael-brown/#ixzz3B4qETRaH

Yes, needing Xrays for your swollen face after taking a non-beating from a gentle giant is sort of like nothing, except for the something swollen part. Good thing most of the 292# was from Hostess and not weightlifting.

 

[Wrong Element]

Facts no longer matter, which is what I said on Day One.

It appears you were really on to something.

 

[Boxlicker101]

CNN: NO ORBITAL BLOWOUT, NO EYE INJURY FOR OFFICER WILSON

Read it and weep, wingnuts: No break, no tear....NOTHING

#DiscreditedWingnutTalkingPoints

I think I'd rather go by this report in a major newspaper than an anon. source.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...cuffle-with-michael-brown-family-friend-says/

 

[Que]

I think I'd rather go by this report in a major newspaper than an anon. source.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...cuffle-with-michael-brown-family-friend-says/

In this case, the Washington Post and Fox bit on what might have been just a guess on his condition. We know he was hit in the face, we know there was swelling. That is all that we know for sure from released statements.

There isn't much tissue on a skull that is why they bleed profusely and bruise easily. Assaulting a cop isn't a death sentence, but it shows that the decedent did not fear attacking a cop.

 

[Boxlicker101]

In this case, the Washington Post and Fox bit on what might have been just a guess on his condition. We know he was hit in the face, we know there was swelling. That is all that we know for sure from released statements.

There isn't much tissue on a skull that is why they bleed profusely and bruise easily. Assaulting a cop isn't a death sentence, but it shows that the decedent did not fear attacking a cop.

I'm a little puzzled as to what you mean by that. I agree resisting arrest and assaulting an officer of the law are not capital crimes but the infliction of serious injuries, whether there is a broken bone or not, does justify using deadly force in self-defense. After all, nobody is expected to just stand there and be a punching bag.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

I think I'd rather go by this report in a major newspaper than an anon. source.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...cuffle-with-michael-brown-family-friend-says/

Isn't that the cop that gunned down an unarmed teenager in the streets, from 35 feet away, in broad daylight, for walking down the middle of the street with his buddy?

'Protect and Serve' - oh yeah. Let's give that douche a medal. In fact, let's name it after him.

The Officer Wilson Star - for perpetuating the myth that fear and intimidation are necessary to a free society.

 

[Que]

Isn't that the cop that gunned down an unarmed teenager in the streets, from 35 feet away, in broad daylight, for walking down the middle of the street with his buddy?

'Protect and Serve' - oh yeah. Let's give that douche a medal. In fact, let's name it after him.

The Officer Wilson Star - for perpetuating the myth that fear and intimidation are necessary to a free society.

Nope. That cop does not exist, nor does the incident as you portray it. Of course, you being you, after the actual facts are known whatever they turn out to be, you will still be parroting that line as your betters have fed you.

Kind of like that poor 8th grader that was shot in the back skipping home from the 7-11 with nothing but kindness in his heart and skittles in his hand.

I'm a little puzzled as to what you mean by that. I agree resisting arrest and assaulting an officer of the law are not capital crimes but the infliction of serious injuries, whether there is a broken bone or not, does justify using deadly force in self-defense. After all, nobody is expected to just stand there and be a punching bag.

We don't know yet when he was punched in relation to when he shot. Had be not been punched at all and he was being threatened by a 292 pound guy who was rushing him he still could be justified in shooting. I lean towards probably he did reasonably fear a second assault. Facts haven't been released yet.

A story has been floated that Boy above is ready to convict on, but all of the elements he describes have been shown to be false. At least Boy isn't claiming shot in the back going away as the early version of the story was. So, that is something.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Nope. That cop does not exist, nor does the incident as you portray it. Of course, you being you, after the actual facts are known whatever they turn out to be, you will still be parroting that line as your betters have fed you.

Kind of like that poor 8th grader that was shot in the back skipping home from the 7-11 with nothing but kindness in his heart and skittles in his hand.

Vette?

 

[Boxlicker101]

The first post I made on this subject, which was in a different thread, said to wait and get the facts before rushing to judgment. It now appears that I and some others were correct in adopting the wait-and-see approach. I didn't KNOW about this specific case but I don't believe the cops make a habit of going around bumping off people just for the fun of it.

Others loudly screamed "Guilty" before they really knew much. I suspect they did the same in the George Zimmerman case. I was not on this forum at the time, but I am also quite sure the usual suspects were also clamoring for the Duke La Crosse players to be thrown under the jail for the dastardly crime that turned out to have never been committed.

When do you think these clowns will get enough sense to collect information on an alleged crime before passing judgment?

 

[snugglestruggle]

Assaulting a cop isn't a death sentence, but it shows that the decedent did not fear attacking a cop.

You have to be brazen to attack an armed cop. In the 305/954 if you even behave like your going to attack the cop, your target practice.

 

[about_average]

I think I'd rather go by this report in a major newspaper than an anon. source.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...cuffle-with-michael-brown-family-friend-says/

You'd rather go on hearsay?

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

I'm a little puzzled as to what you mean by that. I agree resisting arrest and assaulting an officer of the law are not capital crimes but the infliction of serious injuries, whether there is a broken bone or not, does justify using deadly force in self-defense. After all, nobody is expected to just stand there and be a punching bag.

They are capital crimes, bonehead. Touching a cop is a felony. More is grounds for shooting you. That is, cops can summarily execute your ass.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The first post I made on this subject, which was in a different thread, said to wait and get the facts before rushing to judgment. It now appears that I and some others were correct in adopting the wait-and-see approach. I didn't KNOW about this specific case but I don't believe the cops make a habit of going around bumping off people just for the fun of it.

Others loudly screamed "Guilty" before they really knew much. I suspect they did the same in the George Zimmerman case. I was not on this forum at the time, but I am also quite sure the usual suspects were also clamoring for the Duke La Crosse players to be thrown under the jail for the dastardly crime that turned out to have never been committed.

When do you think these clowns will get enough sense to collect information on an alleged crime before passing judgment?

They have the story memorized and use it on every available occasion.

 

[about_average]

More is grounds for shooting you. That is, cops can summarily execute your ass.

Utter and complete bullshit.

 

[Boxlicker101]

You'd rather go on hearsay?

Hearsay is all we have. I would rather go on the hearsay of a reputable newspaper than on anonymous third-hand hearsay in a suspect blog. After all, I haven't examined the man's face for injuries or seen his X-ray and I wouldn't know what to look for anyhow.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Utter and complete bullshit.

You would know.

 

[about_average]

Hearsay is all we have. I would rather go on the hearsay of a reputable newspaper than on anonymous third-hand hearsay in a suspect blog.

Except the (anonymous) person claiming the fracture also says the medical records have been turned over to the prosecutor's office. Yet, when you dig deeper, the prosecutor's office state they've received no such records, according to another Post article from 6 hours later.
So half the hearsay information is wrong. That makes me really question the other half.

 

[about_average]

You would know.

Yes, I do, and anyone with half a brain knows it also.

Since you appear to not know, here is the actual fact:
- It doesn't matter what a person has done, if they are no longer a threat it's not legal to shoot them.

Of course, if you present a statute from anywhere in the US showing it's legal for a cop to kill someone who is not a threat, I'll be happy to retract the above.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Except the (anonymous) person claiming the fracture also says the medical records have been turned over to the prosecutor's office. Yet, when you dig deeper, the prosecutor's office state they've received no such records, according to another Post article from 6 hours later.
So half the hearsay information is wrong. That makes me really question the other half.

The prosecutor hasn't picked them up. Recall that its the prosecutors game till there's an indictment, and he can give the grand jury as much or little as he wants them to see. But once Wilson is indicted then both sides must put their cards face up on the table. Its called DISCOVERY. Then they collect DISPOSITIONS where witnesses are questioned on the record.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Yes, I do, and anyone with half a brain knows it also.

Since you appear to not know, here is the actual fact:
- It doesn't matter what a person has done, if they are no longer a threat it's not legal to shoot them.

Of course, if you present a statute from anywhere in the US showing it's legal for a cop to kill someone who is not a threat, I'll be happy to retract the above.

I know about nullification. Judges and juries routinely alter the meaning of facts and words. They are finders of facts and decide what is, IS.