UK Authors aren't making a living from writing.

oggbashan

Dying Truth seeker
Joined
Jul 3, 2002
Posts
56,017
This is copy and paste from the secondhand bookdealers' trade newsletter.

It is bad news for UK authors, but not unexpected.

The typical income for a professional author in 2013 was just £11,000, more than £5,000 below the income level considered to be a socially acceptable standard of living, according to research commissioned by The Authors’ Licensing & Collection Society (ALCS).

The ALCS said the research, commissioned from Queen Mary, University of London, showed these are “concerning times for writers”. Society of Authors chief executive Nicola Solomon also said she was "very concerned" at the findings, saying that the author's share of the profits of the publishing and book retailing business was falling and pointing out: "Authors are the one person who are 100% necessary [to the process]."

Titled "What are words worth now?", the research report was based on findings from a total of 2,454 writers, of which 56% were men and 44% women. It showed that in 2013 11.5% of professional authors, defined as those who dedicate the majority of their time to writing, earned their income solely from writing.

This is a drop from the 40% who earned their living from writing in 2005, when the typical income for a professional author was £12,330.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation, a development and social research charity, says that single people need to earn at least £16,850 before tax to achieve a Minimum Income Standard (MIS), the amount considered to be an “adequate” income.

The ALCS said because earnings from writing fall “way below that standard, it is not surprising that the number of full-time writers is…declining sharply”.

The typical income for all writers, including professional authors and those who class themselves as occasional and part-time writers, was £4,000 in 2013, the same as in 2005, but a drop from the £6,333 typical income in 2000.

Owen Atkinson, chief executive of the ALCS, said: “These are concerning times for writers. This rapid decline in both author incomes and in the numbers of those writing full time could have serious implications for the economic success of the creative industries in the UK.

"If writers are to continue making their irreplaceable contribution to the UK economy, they need to be paid fairly for their work. This means ensuring clear, fair contracts with equitable terms and a copyright regime that supports creators and their ability to earn a living from their creations.”

Novelist Joanne Harris commented: “It’s good to see that finally we are becoming aware of just how little the average author earns. Not everyone can be a high earning, high profile writer but all creators should have the right to be paid for what they do.” Poet Wendy Cope said: “Most people know that a few writers make a lot of money. This survey tells us about the vast majority of writers, who don’t. It’s important that the public should understand this – and why it is so important for authors to be paid fairly for their work.”

The survey also looked at contracts and self-publishing.

Of the respondents, more than 69% said their contracts allowed them to retain copyright all or most of the time.

“Retaining copyright puts authors in a much stronger position in terms of negotiating where and how their works can be used,” the research said. “The best contracts clearly set out which rights authors are retaining or transferring.

“It is becoming increasingly important for writers to prove their ownership of rights in their works in order to secure key sources of income.”

A quarter of those who took part in the research had self-published, “with a typical return on their investment of 40%”. The ALCS said the mean investment recorded by this group was £2,470, £500 median. Nevertheless, of those who self-published, 86% said they would do so again.

The SoA's Solomon said: "Author earnings are going down and the number of people working full-time as writers is falling because they can't make a living from it. It's very concerning. Publishers' profits are going up - our concern is that authors are getting a smaller share than they used to. In retail, we can't forget that what is happening with retailers, and Amazon particularly - the drive to give a bigger share to Amazon will impact on authors because of [Amazon's high] discounts. Amazon says it is giving cheaper prices to its customers, but if you see it pushing the producers out of business, that is not a viable business model."

She added that the SoA was concerned about the terms and conditions being offered by publishers on continuing share, and that the 25% royalty rate commonly offered on e-books "doesn't adequately reward authors and is giving publishers a disproportionate share."

Full details from the ALCS author earnings research will not be released until the autumn.
 
Yes, I read the Guardian article on this. Not that those of us trying to turn literary tricks for pennies haven't noticed.

When even multiple prize-winning authors have to house-sit to make ends meet, what hope for the rest of us? Bring back the Net Book Agreement, hunt down tax-dodging Amazon and, most of all, bring back paternalism and old-fashioned education - then we might be getting somewhere.
 
This is the world Ayn Rand created for us. Wonder how she'd feel about it?

Please explain how it is Chelsea Clinton makes 27,000 a minute to interview animated lizards on tv and 75,000 an hour to lead pep rallys for her ma.
 
Yes, I read the Guardian article on this. Not that those of us trying to turn literary tricks for pennies haven't noticed.

When even multiple prize-winning authors have to house-sit to make ends meet, what hope for the rest of us? Bring back the Net Book Agreement, hunt down tax-dodging Amazon and, most of all, bring back paternalism and old-fashioned education - then we might be getting somewhere.

A good point!
 
There are an awful lot of things I'd love to do for a living, but they would never pay well enough for me to consider doing them. So I do something else instead.

Yes, the business has changed. Adapt or die, I guess. Something like the Net Book Agreement smells like collusion and a violation of anti-trust laws here in the states, and probably in the UK, which is why it was abolished.

Why not self publish if one feels they can do better?
 
All that British authors (or any other authors, for that matter, need to do is to figure out how Hillary Clinton got a $14 million USD advance to write her usual pack of lies.
 
I am probably not voicing a very popular opinion, but JBJ put it perfectly with his bovine analogy.

You have the right to make a living, but you cannot choose freely "how." That power belongs to whomever is paying you. And just because you feel that what you do is of high importance and great value, it doesn't mean that other people agree with you.

And value isn't merely determined by the quality of a product, but also by supply and demand. Everybody and his cat dream of making a living as a writer, thus resulting in an overcrowded market. Never before in history has there been produced as much literature as today and the old stuff doesn't go away - Arthur Conan Doyle and Agatha Christie are still competing with contemporary authors despite both being long dead. In other words, what you are trying to peddle is something that people have coming out of the wazoo. Being a writer is like selling sand in Sahara. Unless you are offering some really special sand, don't expect to get paid much for it.
 
I am probably not voicing a very popular opinion, but JBJ put it perfectly with his bovine analogy.

You have the right to make a living, but you cannot choose freely "how." That power belongs to whomever is paying you. And just because you feel that what you do is of high importance and great value, it doesn't mean that other people agree with you.

And value isn't merely determined by the quality of a product, but also by supply and demand. Everybody and his cat dream of making a living as a writer, thus resulting in an overcrowded market. Never before in history has there been produced as much literature as today and the old stuff doesn't go away - Arthur Conan Doyle and Agatha Christie are still competing with contemporary authors despite both being long dead. In other words, what you are trying to peddle is something that people have coming out of the wazoo. Being a writer is like selling sand in Sahara. Unless you are offering some really special sand, don't expect to get paid much for it.

I'll join you in that unpopular opinion.

Although I would argue that you don’t even need special sand. All you need is enough marketing savvy to make people think it's special. Ask E. L. James.
 
So what's the average yearly wage in the UK for a fast-food worker?
 
All you need is enough marketing savvy to make people think it's special. Ask E. L. James.

Yes, if you can capture the zeitgeist somehow you can definitely make it big - whether you write complete garbage (E. L. James, Stephenie Meyer) or quality (J.K. Rowling, Suzanne Collins, Daniel Suarez).

Or you can start an "industrial production" (James Patterson, Danielle Steel, Tom Clancy) and go for volume.

Or create a series whose protagonist is intriguing enough to capture the readers to the point where they have to see what happens next (Lee Child, Laurell K. Hamilton, Jim Butcher).

... and if you are lucky enough to get singled out by a TV producer you are pretty much set for life (Charlaine Harris, George R. R. Martin).

Some again have jumped media entirely and are taking advantage of the new possibilities of our time. Like Bioshock Infinite (Ken Levine) - one of the most memorable novels I have "read" lately...."written" on a modified Unreal engine.

It's pretty evident that not all writers making a good living from their craft are extraordinarily talented. Some of them have simply managed to maneuver themselves into a position where they can monetize their work for whatever reason. It is not the world that has suddenly become "unfair and unappreciative towards writers" like the whiners will have us believe. The job description has simply changed. Today a writer needs to use some of his or her creativity to decide on presentation and distribution as well.
 
Last edited:
So what's the average yearly wage in the UK for a fast-food worker?

Big M- £6.59 per hour if over 21. The current National Minimum wage is £6.31 for over 21.
 
Last edited:
One of my ancestors was a circuit riding Methodist parson. From 1806-1833 he rode circuits in Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Ohio. He learned to read when he was 23 years old, and took books with him to pass the nights in the Frontier wilderness. His son, my ancestor, inherited the books: They filled a crate that measured 5'x5'x5'. I estimated the crate held 2500 books, which is close to the number of books the family donated to the David Lipscomb College library when the college was created. I have some of John Johnson's sermons, and they are stunning for being written by a bumpkin with no education and no literacy until he was 23 or so.
 
Yes, if you can capture the zeitgeist somehow you can definitely make it big - whether you write complete garbage (E. L. James, Stephenie Meyer) or quality (J.K. Rowling, Suzanne Collins, Daniel Suarez).

Or you can write simply because you enjoy doing so and then be happy that you can make any money off of it at all--if you do. It's great to be able to make a bit of money off of any hobby or auxiliary career that you enjoy doing.

The UK situation isn't unique. Most writers in the United States can't live off what they make either--financially speaking. I certainly don't. But what I do make takes me on a whole lot of nifty vacations (which then create inspiration for more writing, which leads to more royalty money, which leads to more nifty vacations, which . . .).

Those who write (and publish) with a healthy attitude and because they love to write are getting vast rewards from publishing their work that go beyond the financial. I think it's good that most are writing to supplement their disparate careers. Pursuing these other careers and the experiences that come with that gives them something write about.
 
Big problem for indy UK authors is any time some UK rag writes an article that amazon is carrying something questionable, Amazon UK cannot ban all of it fast enough to make them happy.

B/N UK caved on the last witch hunt back in October when people started targeting pseudo-step=incest which for the record breaks no laws. Might be sleazy, but not illegal

The UK population.....

Lives on garbage tabloid journalism while it masturbates to the latest pictures of the palaces latest breeding hostage Kate. Just pop out babies and smile bitch, if you try to leave we'll bury you next to Diana

So no surprise when a rag says "its bad" they all go running.:rolleyes:
 
B/N UK caved on the last witch hunt back in October when people started targeting pseudo-step=incest which for the record breaks no laws. Might be sleazy, but not illegal

Which is rather amusing considering how willing British royals and nobles were to intermarry at the cousin level over the centuries. :D
 
Big problem for indy UK authors is any time some UK rag writes an article that amazon is carrying something questionable, Amazon UK cannot ban all of it fast enough to make them happy.

B/N UK caved on the last witch hunt back in October when people started targeting pseudo-step=incest which for the record breaks no laws. Might be sleazy, but not illegal

The UK population.....

Lives on garbage tabloid journalism while it masturbates to the latest pictures of the palaces latest breeding hostage Kate. Just pop out babies and smile bitch, if you try to leave we'll bury you next to Diana

So no surprise when a rag says "its bad" they all go running.:rolleyes:

Doesn't help that HMG is using the Internet Menace for political ends, either. Friend of mine has a blog that discusses her experience as a survivor of child abuse, and it's blocked by the UK's new anti-porn filters. Meanwhile, one of the guys who drafted the filtering policy has been arrested for... guess what?
 
[quibble]
Define 'writer'. Is this restricted to 'literary' fiction-spewers? Are those employed as copywriters, editors, reporters, propagandists, tech writers, professors, etc included? Do these writers even WANT to be considered authors?

Or let's say that X is known as a published poet or critic or public intellectual, but makes their living teaching literature. Their publishing income may be minimal. Are they an impoverished 'writer'? Do their written lectures, necessary for their job, count as 'writing'?

Methinks many apples and kumquats are being bundled with oranges here.
[/quibble]
 
I think "fiction writer" has been in the minds of those in this discussion.
 
Big M- £6.59 per hour if over 21. The current National Minimum wage is £6.31 for over 21.

Thank You. So that's £13707.20 for a 40hr week with no vacation over 52 weeks for the Big M and £13124.80 @ minimum wage. Both of which are about £3k less than acceptable in the UK.

Therefore ( :D ), you're better off flipping burgers than writing when trying to make a living in the UK.
But: For a sparse less than the average worker, you can set your own hours and there is no grease or fire involved (usually).

Tough call...

Although, the average writer can get a second job at minimum wage and clear over £24000 a year before taxes, so I don't see what the problem is other than work harder and write better :)
 
I think "fiction writer" has been in the minds of those in this discussion.

Aha. And that means 'entertainer'. And, last I looked, entertainers tended not to be fabulously paid. Everyone wants to be a superstar; most are lucky to survive in a bar band for a couple years, if they aren't laughed offstage during auditions.

Shall I cite technological changes? Consider: before TV, zillions upon zillion of pulp magazines entertained the semi-literate masses. Such entertainment demanded pulp writers, rather many of them. Comes TV and the killing of the pulp-mag market, many of those writers had to get honest jobs.

We're into a similar process now, as publishing plummets from the heights of paper to the depths of digital promulgation. Publishers no longer need legions of writers and skilled editors to fill their printing presses -- and with all the wannabe superstar authors submitting their offerings, the supply vs demand equation dictates lower payment. It's harder for hookers to make a living when amateurs are giving it away for free, eh?
 
Those who write (and publish) with a healthy attitude and because they love to write are getting vast rewards from publishing their work that go beyond the financial. I think it's good that most are writing to supplement their disparate careers. Pursuing these other careers and the experiences that come with that gives them something write about.


Right on the mark. And the volume of stories here at Lit is testament to the fact that many feel the same way. It's a rewarding and very educational hobby - and if you are good enough it might even net you a little extra cash, as evident in your case.

But writing is a very poor choice of career. Making it big as a writer is kinda like making it big as an actor, musician or ball player. Talent is only part of it. It's a lot of work too and chances are high that you will waste years of hard and frustrating work without ever making it. Most successful writers either had "a real job" while writing their break-through novel (George R. R. Martin) or a spouse who loved them enough to take care of all the bills (Stephen King).

And this is hardly a secret. People who insisted on pursuing a career as full time writers must have known in advance that they were taking a major chance.
 
Last edited:
And this is hardly a secret. People who insisted on pursuing a career as full time writers must have known in advance that they were taking a major chance.

Unfortunately not. I've worked in publishing nearly twenty years ago (after a lucrative career with a fantastic annuity). I've worked directly with authors in publishing houses. Most of those thought they would be a best-seller tomorrow because of their brilliant book and were only thinking Stephen King and John Grisham as the pay bracket for one first-time book drafted. (They also invariably think that the only one involved in making their book a best-seller is themselves, the author.)
 
Og - a question

Og, I have been told that the UK market is particularly difficult to break into for new fiction authors because of the dominance of a couple of retailers, WH Smith and Waterstones. They allegedly demand a substantial 'up front' payment from publishers and authors to put their books in the store and argue that it is a legitimate marketing expense. Is this correct? Such payments, if made, would be illegal in some other jurisdictions (hidden commissions).

If correct, these demands might also drive even more authors towards internet selling.
 
Back
Top