Lowest Favorable Rating

Amberchgo

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Posts
1,785
PRINCETON, NJ -- Americans view each of the four former living presidents more positively than negatively, while giving Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush higher favorable ratings than George W. Bush and Jimmy Carter. Current President Barack Obama has a net-negative favorable rating.

The younger Bush's current favorable rating is likely lower than other former presidents' ratings because his term, marked by job approval ratings well below 40% during his final two years in office, is the freshest in Americans' minds.

Though Carter left office with similarly poor job approval ratings, his lower favorable ratings today are mostly attributable to one in six Americans not having an opinion of him. That includes 36% of those younger than 30, all of whom were born after Carter left office in 1981. The only other time Gallup measured opinions of Carter with this question format, in 2007, 69% rated him favorably, 27% unfavorably, and 4% had no opinion.

The data are based on a June 5-8, 2014, Gallup poll and represent Americans' current opinions of the four former living presidents and the current president. The elder Bush recently turned 90, and Carter will do so later this year, making them among the longest living former presidents.

In addition to these personal favorable ratings, Gallup has previously measured Americans' views of how each president's term will be judged by history and retrospective job approval ratings of former presidents. Clinton and the elder Bush also fared better than Carter and the younger Bush on those metrics.

Partisanship Drags Down Rating of Current President

Americans typically rate presidents more positively after they leave office, so Obama's relatively worse standing than his predecessors is not surprising. However, the current poll represents Obama's worst favorable rating to date.

The public likely views the incumbent president in more strongly partisan terms than former presidents, given the chief executive's role in negotiating the prevailing political and policy disputes of the day. Past presidents largely stay away from those contentious matters but still serve a public but largely ceremonial role, often using their high profile for charitable work.

As evidence of the more partisan evaluations of the current commander in chief, Republicans give Obama a much lower favorable rating (7%) than the two former Democratic presidents, Clinton and Carter (both 28%).

Still, partisanship is a major factor in how Americans view ex-presidents, with former presidents rated much more highly by supporters of their own party than by supporters of the other party.

Favorable Rating

Clinton 64 %
HW Bush 63%
W Bush 53%
Carter 52%
Obama 47%



http://www.gallup.com/poll/171794/clinton-elder-bush-positively-rated-living-presidents.aspx




Hmmmm.... "Lower than Carter."
 
Anybody want to lay odds Obama's favorability passes G.W.B. almost immediately upon leaving office and no longer being dragged down by his association with the Do Nothing Congress but is instead judged solely on his actions and results?
 
Did you read the article?


Like any of these simpletons ever read the articles -- because if the idiot had, it would have noticed that basically every word provides the context that refutes the point it is trying to make.

Almost as bad as Miles, who has been calling Obama the Fuhrer for six years, posting an article stating that people who throw out Nazi analogies about American politicians are obvious fools. Which in his case is of course true.
 
Anybody want to lay odds Obama's favorability passes G.W.B. almost immediately upon leaving office and no longer being dragged down by his association with the Do Nothing Congress but is instead judged solely on his actions and results?

That do nothing congress has sent over 240 bills to the senate where your hero, that lion of the senate, Harry Reid has refused to bring them to a vote. If you are going to toss shit, toss some in the senates face, they are equally responsible.
 
Like any of these simpletons ever read the articles -- because if the idiot had, it would have noticed that basically every word provides the context that refutes the point it is trying to make.

Almost as bad as Miles, who has been calling Obama the Fuhrer for six years, posting an article stating that people who throw out Nazi analogies about American politicians are obvious fools. Which in his case is of course true.

Miles loves Nazi analogies.
:nods:
 
That do nothing congress has sent over 240 bills to the senate where your hero, that lion of the senate, Harry Reid has refused to bring them to a vote. If you are going to toss shit, toss some in the senates face, they are equally responsible.

I said Congress. Not the House, not the Republicans but Congress as a whole.

Though the House logically has an obligation to send bills to the Senate that are good enough (in the views of the majority of the Senate which is still Democrat last I checked) to have a chance in hell of passing. Those 240 bills are are laced with various poison pills if they weren't the House Republicans could start posting them on the internet for us to read and really fuck over Reid and Obama by showing us the brilliant bills they are refusing to pass.
 
Yes. It says Carter has a higher favorability rating than Obama.

I know, it's math and libbies don't do math.
Just like words and conservatives apparently don't match.

Read all of the article. It's right there in the text you c&p'd.
 
Back
Top