You = A female Subbie seeking an AWESOME Dom

If you are experienced why do you refer to them as sunbird. You should know that it is derogatory. You can calm them sub or submissives but calling them sunbird gives an impression that you don't care for them as a person but rather view them as a title.
 
If you are experienced why do you refer to them as sunbird. You should know that it is derogatory. You can calm them sub or submissives but calling them sunbird gives an impression that you don't care for them as a person but rather view them as a title.

An example of some "Dom" or in this case an "Alpha" (really?) who isn't quite sure of his footing in this lifestyle and rides onto another Doms ad. I'll forgive your youthful enthusiasm but subs beware.
 
Last edited:
If you are experienced why do you refer to them as sunbird. You should know that it is derogatory. You can calm them sub or submissives but calling them sunbird gives an impression that you don't care for them as a person but rather view them as a title.

What the hell is a sunbird?
 
If you are experienced why do you refer to them as sunbird. You should know that it is derogatory. You can calm them sub or submissives but calling them sunbird gives an impression that you don't care for them as a person but rather view them as a title.

:rose:
 
An example of some "Dom" or in this case an "Alpha" (really?) who isn't quite sure of his footing in this lifestyle and rides onto another Doms ad. I'll forgive your youthful enthusiasm but subs beware.

Are you so unsure in your awesomeness that you feel the need to warn every sub out there not to draw attention of any other potential dominant but yourself?
Give kid a break, he is as much as "example of some dom" as you are for those who dont know you both better.
 
I can see you like being controversial, but I am not sure you have your facts quite right. First, frankly every sub should be cautious of any Dom they find on Lit, including me, until they get to know them...that would be my warning. Second any "Dom" who lacks the common courtesy not to hijack someone else's ad and try to act critical about that ad (plus doesn't proof his comments) IS someone to be leery of. It's like a blind date who is rude to a waitress for example. So I am surprised out of this string, me to be critical of.

What I wouldn't do is be the type of individual who would jump on his ad and be critical. I would feel your comments valid in that case. It is almost as bad as defending someone who does behave that way.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top