Alpha male combines gun rights and men's rights.

bronzeage

I am a river to my people
Joined
Jun 20, 2005
Posts
49,685
Elliot Rodger, Gunman in California Mass Shooting, was influenced by the "Men's Rights Movement"

So says the Daily Kos.

These days the first place to go for information is Youtube. Elliot Rodger, the guy who shot six people and then himself last night near the University of California Santa Barbara, last night, posted videos on youtube, where he lays it out:

"It's not fair. You girls have never been attracted to me. I don't know why you girls have never been attracted to me, but I will punish you all for it. It's an injustice, a crime, because I don't know what you don't see in me. I'm the perfect guy, and yet you throw yourselves at all these obnoxious men, instead of me, the supreme gentleman."
"I will punish all of you for it," he says again, and then he laughs.

"On the day of retribution I will enter the hottest sorority house of UCSB, and I will slaughter every single spoiled stuck up blonde slut I see inside there. All those girls that I've desired so much, they would have all rejected me and looked down upon me as an inferior man if I ever made a sexual advance towards them. While they throw themselves at these obnoxious brutes. I'll take great pleasure in slaughtering all of you. You will finally see that I am in truth the superior one. The true Alpha Male."

Here we see the typical drool with all the proper buzz words, including the part about "they throw themselves at these obnoxious brutes." It's plain to see, the reason Elliot is a 22 year old virgin is because of the poor character and faulty judgment of the women of his town.

The rest of the Kos article is a quick run down of Rodger's youtube subscription list, which included a bizarre combination of men's rights topics and "how to pick up chicks" help videos, including one by some guy who calls himself "squattingcasanova."
 
Elliot Rodger, Gunman in California Mass Shooting, was influenced by the "Men's Rights Movement"

So says the Daily Kos.

These days the first place to go for information is Youtube. Elliot Rodger, the guy who shot six people and then himself last night near the University of California Santa Barbara, last night, posted videos on youtube, where he lays it out:



Here we see the typical drool with all the proper buzz words, including the part about "they throw themselves at these obnoxious brutes." It's plain to see, the reason Elliot is a 22 year old virgin is because of the poor character and faulty judgment of the women of his town.

The rest of the Kos article is a quick run down of Rodger's youtube subscription list, which included a bizarre combination of men's rights topics and "how to pick up chicks" help videos, including one by some guy who calls himself "squattingcasanova."

This is the original video he posted.

He is a whiny loser.

Sorry, was.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-jCSZh2tMk
 
Sounds like the whiner needed to study how to be a man, not men's rights. Does he think people with his mindset were ever successful wit teh ladeez at any time in history?

Maybe he is a friend of the well-reasoned communist LJ?

Of course, the Daily Kos likes this angle because they are going to equate it with conservatives that don't care for feminist screeds any more than they approve of "men's rights" screeds.

"Was influenced by" means "found common cause with."
 
Any time a man brings up Alpha males, chances are real good you are talking to a whiny loser.

If he goes on to talk about how women pass him by and choose obnoxious brutes, which is a code word for "bad boy", it's clinched.

22 minutes of that.

And a few on how 'magnificent' and 'gorgeous' he was.
 
Can we grieve for the families of the six that this piece of shit whiny bitch boy - typical of those in the Men's Rights movement - and just never mention his name again? By saying his name gives him fame and credence to the MRA, and doesn't give "his" victims their acknowledgement.
 
I bet LT choked on a bag of peanuts in excitement over this.

To be serious for a moment though, watching that was quite disturbing.
 
I bet LT choked on a bag of peanuts in excitement over this.

To be serious for a moment though, watching that was quite disturbing.

Very disturbing.. I've done a lot of work on that campus and will be driving that road tomorrow. It's a hippie town which makes it even more strange. Most students are too lazy to pull all that off.
 
Very disturbing.. I've done a lot of work on that campus and will be driving that road tomorrow. It's a hippie town which makes it even more strange. Most students are too lazy to pull all that off.

The $300 sunglasses, the BMW...as if women are objects to be attracted to you only for material goods, and then go on and play the 'nice guy' card, all while dismissing every other guy who walked around with a woman on campus as unworthy.

Kind of reminds me of someone on this board whose username starts with a V. You know, the one bitching about how women cross their legs now a days so you can't take a peek, and make jokes about the plight of women being traded for a can of vegetables.
 
Just in case you dont want to watch his video

Hi, Elliot Rodger here.

Well... this is my last video. It all has to come to this.

Tomorrow is the day of retribution. The day in which I will have my revenge against humanity. Against all of you.

For the last 8 years of my life, ever since I've hit puberty, I've been forced to endure an existence of loneliness, rejection, and unfulfilled desires. All because girls have never been attracted to me.

Girls gave their affection, and sex, and love, to other men but never to me.

I'm 22 years old and I'm still a virgin. I've never even kissed a girl.

I've been through college for two and a half years, more than that actually, and I'm still a virgin.

It has been very torturous.

College is the time when everyone experiences those things such as sex, and fun, and pleasure. But in those years I've had to rot in loneliness.

It's not fair. You girls have never been attracted to me.

I don't know why you girls aren't attracted to me, but I will punish you all for it.

It's an injustice, a crime, because I don't know what you don't see in me. I'm the perfect guy, and yet you throw yourselves at all these obnoxious men, instead of me, the supreme gentlemen.

I will punish all of you for it. (laughs)

On the day of retribution I am going to enter the hottest sorority house of UCSB... and I will slaughter every single spoiled, stuck-up, blonde slut I see inside there.

All those girls that I've desired so much, they would've all rejected me and looked down upon me as an inferior man if I ever made a sexual advance towards them while they throw themselves at these obnoxious brutes.

I will take great pleasure in slaughtering all of you.

You will finally see that I am in truth the superior one. The true alpha male. (laughs)

Yes, after I've annihilated every single girl in the sorority house, I'll take to the streets of Isla Vista, and slay every single person I see there.

All those popular kids who live such lives of hedonistic pleasure while I've had to rot in loneliness for all these years, they've all looked down upon me every time I try to go out and join them. They've all treated me like a mouse.

Well now, I will be a God compared to you. You will all be animals. You are animals, and I will slaughter you like animals. I will be a God, exacting my retribution, on all those who deserve it.

And you do deserve it, just for the crime of living a better life than me.

All you popular kids. You've never accepted me, and now you'll all pay for it.

And girls, all I've ever wanted was to love you, and to be loved by you. I've wanted a girlfriend, I've wanted sex, I've wanted love, affection, adoration, but you think I'm unworthy of it.

That's a crime that can never be forgiven.

If I can't have you, girls, I will destroy you. (laughs)

You denied me a happy life, and in turn, I will deny all of you life. (laughs) It's only fair.

I hate all of you, humanity is a disgusting, wretched, depraved species. If I had it in my power, I would stop at nothing, to reduce every single one of you to mountains of skulls and rivers of blood, and rightfully so.

You deserve to be annihilated. And I'll give that to you.

You never showed me any mercy, and so I will show you none. (laughs)

You force me to suffer all my life, and now I'll make you all suffer.

I've waited a long time for this.

I'll give you exactly what you deserve.
 
Elliot Rodger, Gunman in California Mass Shooting, was influenced by the "Men's Rights Movement"

So says the Daily Kos.

These days the first place to go for information is Youtube. Elliot Rodger, the guy who shot six people and then himself last night near the University of California Santa Barbara, last night, posted videos on youtube, where he lays it out:



Here we see the typical drool with all the proper buzz words, including the part about "they throw themselves at these obnoxious brutes." It's plain to see, the reason Elliot is a 22 year old virgin is because of the poor character and faulty judgment of the women of his town.

The rest of the Kos article is a quick run down of Rodger's youtube subscription list, which included a bizarre combination of men's rights topics and "how to pick up chicks" help videos, including one by some guy who calls himself "squattingcasanova."

Thanks, Bronze.

I have zero time for psychos like this bloke.

Blokes like this guy want attention. His big plan was to be heard and I'll not have a bar of it.

Actually, I have zero time for blokes who run down females in general.

A word to the wise. People in glass houses.
 
I think all such situations boil down to parents who fail to realize they are raising homicidal maniacs, internet bullies and all the other trash.
Oh but he has a Beeemwee, I am sure they see themselves as model parents :rolleyes:
 
Thanks, Bronze.

I have zero time for psychos like this bloke.

Blokes like this guy want attention. His big plan was to be heard and I'll not have a bar of it.

Actually, I have zero time for blokes who run down females in general.

A word to the wise. People in glass houses.

The core of our current "men's rights" movement, especially as we see it here on the GB is the idea that women are defective and are unable to make wise choices. Trying to tell them otherwise is as effective as telling an anorexic girl that she is not fat. The flaw lies in their perceptions of themselves.
 
I don't know why none of the girls wanted to fuck him.

Thirty seconds into the video, I was saying "Fuck him!"
 
The core of our current "men's rights" movement, especially as we see it here on the GB is the idea that women are defective and are unable to make wise choices. Trying to tell them otherwise is as effective as telling an anorexic girl that she is not fat. The flaw lies in their perceptions of themselves.

Yes. I agree.

It's funny because my better half and I were discussing perception last night, how finding the right balance can actually change a person's perception.
 
The $300 sunglasses, the BMW...as if women are objects to be attracted to you only for material goods, and then go on and play the 'nice guy' card, all while dismissing every other guy who walked around with a woman on campus as unworthy.

Kind of reminds me of someone on this board whose username starts with a V. You know, the one bitching about how women cross their legs now a days so you can't take a peek, and make jokes about the plight of women being traded for a can of vegetables.

Post more, dick. Truth hurts.
 
I''d like to object to them calling themselves the Men's Rights Movement.

It has nothing to do with men's rights in the sense that other rights movements mean the term. This is a perversion of the language. Possibly the least of their offenses, but it grates on me.

Are there any men here who think these wackadoodles are discussing your rights?
 
I''d like to object to them calling themselves the Men's Rights Movement.

It has nothing to do with men's rights in the sense that other rights movements mean the term. This is a perversion of the language. Possibly the least of their offenses, but it grates on me.

Are there any men here who think these wackadoodles are discussing your rights?

There are a few and they are noticeably absent from this thread.
 
I think characterizing this particular wackadoodle with the men's rights wackadoodles is a stretch...he never even got near a girl to have his "rights" or his prostate violated.

It sounds to me like he did run across a tattered copy of some PUA book..memorized a couple of routines and felt that got him a get laid free diploma.

I see several (hopefully benign) examples of this guy on this board, and no not LJ...I am talking about the guys that complain that they are nice guys and girls don't appreciate the effort they put in to 'earn' some attention.

I cant decide if I want to wing for a guy like that, hire him a hooker, or just bitch slap him.

Daily Kos screed: said:
"I don't think we should be at all surprised that when hateful rhetoric is trained on any group, lone wolves like this guy get triggered."

Yeah, triggered. Cart-horse. What did losers do before there were YouTube channels?

Ever consider that his maladroit attempts at self-improvement might have delayed this spree?

"I'll wait till I can bench 200, and if that doesn't work THEN I'll kill 'em all."

Steroids maybe?

He is also exactly the right age for a psychosis. People had them before Gutenberg, even.
 
Last edited:
On the one hand, I am resistant to the idea of trying to ascribe senseless acts of violence by disturbed individuals to unpopular groups, opinions, or social phenomena. Like after Columbine, when the narrative was dominated by a series of myths about two socially-outcasted nerds who were acting under the influence of Marilyn Manson and violent video games. The overly confident language of that Daily Kos article makes me suspicious.

"We know for a fact that Rodgers was influenced by this movement..."

"Rather than seeking mental help for some obvious issues, he sought out the Men's Rights Movement."

Doesn't pass the smell test, for me. This young man didn't kill anyone because of the Youtube videos he was watching.

On the other hand, I think it is valid to look at crimes like this through the overall lens of the nature of violent crimes against women.

Several global surveys suggest that half of all women who die from homicide are killed by their current or former husbands or partners. In Australia, Canada, Israel, South Africa and the United States, 40%-70% of female murder victims were killed by their partners, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). In Colombia, one woman is reportedly killed by her partner or former partner every six days. Hundreds of women were abducted, raped and murdered in and around Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, over a 10-year period.

UN Fact Sheet on violence against women.
 
On the one hand, I am resistant to the idea of trying to ascribe senseless acts of violence by disturbed individuals to unpopular groups, opinions, or social phenomena. Like after Columbine, when the narrative was dominated by a series of myths about two socially-outcasted nerds who were acting under the influence of Marilyn Manson and violent video games. The overly confident language of that Daily Kos article makes me suspicious.

"We know for a fact that Rodgers was influenced by this movement..."

"Rather than seeking mental help for some obvious issues, he sought out the Men's Rights Movement."

Doesn't pass the smell test, for me. This young man didn't kill anyone because of the Youtube videos he was watching.

On the other hand, I think it is valid to look at crimes like this through the overall lens of the nature of violent crimes against women.



UN Fact Sheet on violence against women.

Let's start with a basic premise, a premise that overwhelmingly speaks more to being the truth of the situation as opposed to the exception and that premise is this;

"Anything written or said about an individual(s) within the first few hours after that individual(s) have committed some heinous act is most likely WRONG."

The only thing known new about the little monster as of this AM is that he was diagnosed as a "High Functioning" Asberger's person. A diagnoses, which if true, certainly fits in with his inability to socialize. And because "High Functioning" is a relative term, perhaps he wasn't as "High Functioning" as assumed by his parents.

He was certainly not helped by his parents. Being a hormonally driven young social cripple would certainly play havoc with his psyche. So rather than receiving counseling to help him interact with others, he was left to his own devices to find 'reasons' why others didn't want to interact with him. Which always results in the 'others' being to blame. So I don't discount that he may have indeed have had some of the publications listed in his possession. Those types of publications would give focus to his frustration. But that's all they did, they weren't the cause, merely the reinforcement he seemed to so desperately want.

That being said, has LT posted since the rampage took place?

Ishmael
 
Sounds like the whiner needed to study how to be a man, not men's rights. Does he think people with his mindset were ever successful wit teh ladeez at any time in history?

Maybe he is a friend of the well-reasoned communist LJ?

Of course, the Daily Kos likes this angle because they are going to equate it with conservatives that don't care for feminist screeds any more than they approve of "men's rights" screeds.

"Was influenced by" means "found common cause with."

LT was my first thought too...
 
Let's start with a basic premise, a premise that overwhelmingly speaks more to being the truth of the situation as opposed to the exception and that premise is this;

"Anything written or said about an individual(s) within the first few hours after that individual(s) have committed some heinous act is most likely WRONG."

The only thing known new about the little monster as of this AM is that he was diagnosed as a "High Functioning" Asberger's person. A diagnoses, which if true, certainly fits in with his inability to socialize. And because "High Functioning" is a relative term, perhaps he wasn't as "High Functioning" as assumed by his parents.

He was certainly not helped by his parents. Being a hormonally driven young social cripple would certainly play havoc with his psyche. So rather than receiving counseling to help him interact with others, he was left to his own devices to find 'reasons' why others didn't want to interact with him. Which always results in the 'others' being to blame. So I don't discount that he may have indeed have had some of the publications listed in his possession. Those types of publications would give focus to his frustration. But that's all they did, they weren't the cause, merely the reinforcement he seemed to so desperately want.

That being said, has LT posted since the rampage took place?

Ishmael

Now, what about the meds....

;) ;)
 
Back
Top