Female student hypnotizes male prof, for sex.

[loquere]

-An introverted male Harvard professor the most brilliant in his field, rejects all social interactions with his students. Female seduction is lost on him.
-A beautiful smart blonde Harvard student sets about using hypnotism on him. Her pussy gets drenched during his lectures, she has a thing for intellect.


-It's not about grades or anything untoward, it's about a sexy smart young woman developing a crush on an introverted middle aged Prof & wanting to force him to fuck her brains out. Then cuddle up around the fireplace naked, kissing each other all over, while discussing unhinged in-depth theories the world over.

-It turns into a battle of two brilliant minds as he realizes he was hypnotized.

 

[LadyVer]

Sounds like a possible Mind Control story, although if the woman is that intelligent, she wouldn't use hypnosis to seduce the professor.

 

[loquere]

Sexist!

Sounds like a possible Mind Control story, although if the woman is that intelligent, she wouldn't use hypnosis to seduce the professor.

Why didnt you say the same thing on the male student hypnotism thread. I'm afriad you're a SEXIST!

 

[Sean Renaud]

I'm a sexist. Guys are not girls and vice versa, the story doesn't make as much sense gender flipped. Just like I'm racist. A black guy having white slaves carries an entirely different flavor from a white guy with black slaves. Maybe in a few decades this will be different.

Also a professor (male or female) has good reason to avoid sex with students that has nothing to do with being introverted. Like not wanting to be fired and one only needs to take a look at the news to know that while both may go down there is alot more pity for the leggy blonde who entertains a boy scout troop of 12 year olds than there is for the guy who sleeps with an 18 year old student who hasn't graduated yet. That's simple reality.

However that's where the fun of the story could be. She can't have him because his morals are too strong, she resorts to mind control basically telling him she's gonna get what she wants the question is if he's going to give it to her under mutually beneficial terms or if she's going to have him drop trou mid lecture where she'll take what's hers. . .in front of the entire class and their cameras and see if he can talk his way out of it.

 

[Hypoxia]

Twists: The seductress is herself an MC subject, a pawn of the prof's enemies or manipulators. If enemies (maybe allied to a vengeful ex), they just want him fired and his career ruined; they hypnotize the seductress to bring him down. If manipulators, they want him fired so they can recruit him for their nefarious scheme, which depends on his research and skills.

Genders are easily flipped in either of the above scenarios.

Further twistings: The seducer/seductress breaks free from the MC and allies with the prof. OR the seducer/seductress targets and subverts the prof's mate also, leading to 3-ways (or more). OR the prof recognizes the seductive/hypnotic action and returns it, taking control themselves. OR any number of other possibilities. Have fun!

 

[loquere]

I'm a sexist. Guys are not girls and vice versa, the story doesn't make as much sense gender flipped. Just like I'm racist. A black guy having white slaves carries an entirely different flavor from a white guy with black slaves. Maybe in a few decades this will be different.

Also a professor (male or female) has good reason to avoid sex with students that has nothing to do with being introverted. Like not wanting to be fired and one only needs to take a look at the news to know that while both may go down there is alot more pity for the leggy blonde who entertains a boy scout troop of 12 year olds than there is for the guy who sleeps with an 18 year old student who hasn't graduated yet. That's simple reality.

However that's where the fun of the story could be. She can't have him because his morals are too strong, she resorts to mind control basically telling him she's gonna get what she wants the question is if he's going to give it to her under mutually beneficial terms or if she's going to have him drop trou mid lecture where she'll take what's hers. . .in front of the entire class and their cameras and see if he can talk his way out of it.

The idea that a woman can’t: pursue a man, ask out a man, sexually assault a man, is ridiculous, yes kind of sounds a tad sexist. Some women are predators too. I’m seeking equality here; I would love a world where women fight combat on the front line. Play in the professional leagues and are antagonists in Literotica NCR stories

Because it's against the rules is a good argument, but he could still be introverted as an extra obstacle, when people get hot and bothered rules usually fuck off.

Once again I do have to say a Professor Student relationship is different than students dating HS teachers. That for the most part is pedophilia. I don’t like those lopsided power relationships either, for the record.

Tenured Professors would not see any action taken in most schools for having a relationship with an of age student not under their sphere of influence I’ve seen a case where a Professor very very very very very very very very very very very publically dated a student for a while.

 

[Sean Renaud]

This isn't about equality, this is about being identical. I didn't say or mean to imply that a woman cannot be a predator, ask a man out or any of that. They can, they don't do it very often because people have a hard time coming up with scenarios that aren't bat shit crazy for them but still. This isn't about equality so much as sameness.

A student not under their sphere of influence isn't really a student now are they? And no high school romances are are not generally peodos. Pedos specifically like pre-pubecent girls. Have whatever moral issues you want about the difference between a 17 years 11 months and 29 day olds and eighteen on the dot that you like neither of them are pedophiles.

 

[loquere]

Twists: The seductress is herself an MC subject, a pawn of the prof's enemies or manipulators. If enemies (maybe allied to a vengeful ex), they just want him fired and his career ruined; they hypnotize the seductress to bring him down. If manipulators, they want him fired so they can recruit him for their nefarious scheme, which depends on his research and skills.

Genders are easily flipped in either of the above scenarios.

Further twistings: The seducer/seductress breaks free from the MC and allies with the prof. OR the seducer/seductress targets and subverts the prof's mate also, leading to 3-ways (or more). OR the prof recognizes the seductive/hypnotic action and returns it, taking control themselves. OR any number of other possibilities. Have fun!

"A fisherman always sees another fisherman from afar.”

-W2MNS

-I love what you just said Hypoxia.

-Can't we make her a spy? Spies are hot? (I probably over use female spies)

-She can be an exchange student from Oxford/Cambridge/LSE/UCL/ICL. But really she's an -exchange student and an intelligence officer for MI6.

-I love women with British accents, being a spy magnifies that to unprecedented numbers.

-Let’s write this together Hypoxia.

 

[loquere]

This isn't about equality, this is about being identical. I didn't say or mean to imply that a woman cannot be a predator, ask a man out or any of that. They can, they don't do it very often because people have a hard time coming up with scenarios that aren't bat shit crazy for them but still. This isn't about equality so much as sameness.

A student not under their sphere of influence isn't really a student now are they? And no high school romances are are not generally peodos. Pedos specifically like pre-pubecent girls. Have whatever moral issues you want about the difference between a 17 years 11 months and 29 day olds and eighteen on the dot that you like neither of them are pedophiles.

I was just saying that sometimes but rarely the kid is 18, but if the kid is 18 this in itself is not pedophilia. Consent occurs.

If the kid is under 18 in my opinion it should be a capital crime. Pedophiles should face the death penalty. I’ve said this publically for years.

 

[Sean Renaud]

That however does not make them pedophiles. The term has a meaning and you can get pissy about it all you want it doesn't change the actual medical reality nor the legal reality in much of the country and more of the world. To say nothing of the countless abortions and teen pregnancies that result from if not your precise belief but beliefs closely adjacent to your own.

Regardless.

 

[loquere]

That however does not make them pedophiles. The term has a meaning and you can get pissy about it all you want it doesn't change the actual medical reality nor the legal reality in much of the country and more of the world. To say nothing of the countless abortions and teen pregnancies that result from if not your precise belief but beliefs closely adjacent to your own.

Regardless.

I'm Pro Choice for the record.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I'm Pro Choice for the record.

I was more leaning on the pro-education vs abstinance only but that's why I said adjacent because I don't know your political beliefs. And while I'm also pro-choice I'd still start with pills and condoms and hope that choice never needs to be made. Which was actually my point at the moment. We spend an absurd amount of time protecting kids from sex in America and what do we get for it? The highest abortion and teen pregnancy rates in the first world. Japanese kids cartoons have to be edited for the US, Mexican Seasame Street would be on late night Mtv (or would have when they still had music videos), Europe has full frontal commersials. They also mostly have lower ages of consent (generally 16 but not always.)

I can't help but think that when you allow teens to have sex (in some cases and drink) and they get pregnant less than the kids who aren't allowed and aren't able to watch it that clearly the problem isn't our corrupt culture so much as it is our ignorant (through no fault of their own) children. That's what that combination of facts says to me.

But we're beginning to digress more than I'm really intending to do. Especially because I do like your idea more or less.

 

[Hypoxia]

-Let’s write this together Hypoxia.

Sorry, I don't do MC. It's cheating. Well, maybe or a fantasy satire. "I just gave his mind a push and he did exactly what I wanted." Yeah, right.

Naw, I depend on persuasion and pheromones. Hmm, hormones... The EC spy (sent from Brussels) surreptitiously takes bio-samples from the prof to learn their physiological susceptibilities. The EC lab then brews customized pheromones for the spy to wear/apply, to render the prof CONTROLLED. Not MC, but sexual hormone control. "Get'em by the balls, and their hearts and minds will follow."

Title? "A PIECE OF MY MIND - Just leave me the juicy bits". Or maybe "PRE-FRONTAL LOVE - Lobotomized by lust". Whatever.

 

[LadyVer]

Why didnt you say the same thing on the male student hypnotism thread. I'm afriad you're a SEXIST!

Give the link. I don't remember it.

 

[loquere]

Sorry, I don't do MC. It's cheating. Well, maybe or a fantasy satire. "I just gave his mind a push and he did exactly what I wanted." Yeah, right.

Naw, I depend on persuasion and pheromones. Hmm, hormones... The EC spy (sent from Brussels) surreptitiously takes bio-samples from the prof to learn their physiological susceptibilities. The EC lab then brews customized pheromones for the spy to wear/apply, to render the prof CONTROLLED. Not MC, but sexual hormone control. "Get'em by the balls, and their hearts and minds will follow."

Title? "A PIECE OF MY MIND - Just leave me the juicy bits". Or maybe "PRE-FRONTAL LOVE - Lobotomized by lust". Whatever.

we just took the MC out. It was a joke for me before. Now its a spy story the girls seduces him no mind control.

I would never write a mind control story.

 

[loquere]

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1030914

 

[LadyVer]

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1030914

I didn't comment on the thread and never saw it. And yet, you're saying I'm sexist. Geeze. You're pushing your fricking luck today, genius.

 

[loquere]

I didn't comment on the thread and never saw it. And yet, you're saying I'm sexist. Geeze. You're pushing your fricking luck today, genius.

You know what I apologize. I mixed up the threads, you commented on the detective thread. Sorry!

 

[LadyVer]

You know what I apologize. I mixed up the threads, you commented on the detective thread. Sorry!

I was just thinking how confusing these threads are. It's hard to tell what's going on at times. No prob. And I was feeling a tad disappointed over something that was completely unrelated and vented on you.

 

[loquere]

I was just thinking how confusing these threads are. It's hard to tell what's going on at times. No prob. And I was feeling a tad disappointed over something that was completely unrelated and vented on you.

I had to get off my high horse recently, over an incident (told you about it) I understand getting fired up over apparent wrong doings. However, I was still wrong for calling you a sexist.

 

[LadyVer]

I had to get off my high horse recently, over an incident (told you about it) I understand getting fired up over apparent wrong doings. However, I was still wrong for calling you a sexist.

Well, I know I'm not, and you've apologized, so on to giant cocks.

 

[Hypoxia]

Well, I know I'm not, and you've apologized, so on to giant cocks.

These giant cocks -- are they hypnotized?

 

[LadyVer]

These giant cocks -- are they hypnotized?

Loquere would know that.

 

[loquere]

we just took the MC out. It was a joke for me before. Now its a spy story the girls seduces him no mind control.

I would never write a mind control story.

No more Mind Control, asper my earlier posting.
Thank you for you cooperation.

-Keep calm & carry on.

 

[Sean Renaud]

These giant cocks -- are they hypnotized?

No. They hypnotise women. Duh. Almost finished by the way and I hate you all.