4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
Oh really? Which crops should we start growing in the deserts?
Dumbass...
Look at how much unused land mass is in Russia and Canada due to the cold.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh really? Which crops should we start growing in the deserts?
Dumbass...
Look at how much unused land mass is in Russia and Canada due to the cold.
And it's probably pointless to discuss how much moisture is going to be circulating in the atmosphere.
Ishmael
Oh really? Which crops should we start growing in the deserts?
Totally, that's not real SCIENCE! It's heresy...
![]()
![]()
I know, yet these very same 'scientists' tell us we're going to have storms of increasing frequency and severity. Gotta love it.
Ishmael
Just this morning I read that the tornado season has begun with a whimper...
![]()
![]()
You can eat land mass.Dumbass...
Look at how much unused land mass is in Russia and Canada due to the cold.
Only if you count Antarctica.Overall, deserts have been growing smaller over the last thirty years or so, not larger. The planet has been greening at a remarkable rate. Plants love CO2.
The latest estimates indicate that 12 million hectares of land are transformed into new man-made deserts every year (UNCCD, 2011a) http://2sc.unccd.int/fileadmin/uncc...ground_documents/Background_Document_web3.pdf
Only if you count Antarctica.
You can eat land mass.
Only if you count Antarctica.
The sighs of exasperation in this thread alone are enough to turn fossils into fuel.
12,000,000 hectares is an area the size of Pennsylvania. That's the increase in desert area every year.
12,000,000 hectares is an area the size of Pennsylvania. That's the increase in desert area every year.
Discounting the inaccuracies of such claims, the creation of deserts are not due to climate changes but local population growth. Too much livestock is removing the grass, trees are being cut down and generally the land is being grossly mismanaged.
"Inaccuracies" is putting it mildly. You may find this interesting, for example:
http://www.thegwpf.org/rising-co2-level-greening-planet-earth-study/
"A new study based on satellite observations, just released globally by Australia’s science agency the CSIRO, is likely to cause a stir among anti-carbon dioxide global warming alarmist circles. According to the study, over the past three decades the rise in atmospheric CO2 has contributed significantly to the greening of our planet."
Great article. That's exactly why the flora was so diverse and prolific during the jurassic age. Increased CO2 level in the atmosphere will not hurt us, but it will super charge the plant life... which in turn will absorb the CO2 and eventually reduce the level again. Nature provides it's very own regulation mechanism...
...but of course it's much more fun and and way more profitable to predict the end of the world and whine with the alarmist crowd. So that's what many do these days...
In your dreams, maybe.Absolutely incorrect. Deserts are growing smaller, not larger.
In your dreams, maybe.
And it's probably pointless to discuss how much moisture is going to be circulating in the atmosphere.
Ishmael
Overall, deserts have been growing smaller over the last thirty years or so, not larger. The planet has been greening at a remarkable rate. Plants love CO2.
I know, yet these very same 'scientists' tell us we're going to have storms of increasing frequency and severity. Gotta love it.
Ishmael
One day we may be able to
There are vast areas of the planet that are of very limited use to us today because they are permanently frozen. Getting them into a more pliable temperature zone might not be such a bad thing.
Wrong. The planet as a whole is getting greener. It's something like 17% greener now than it was about thirty years ago. Deserts in various parts of the world are getting greener. Northern areas as well as southern are getting greener. As I said, plants love CO2.
Great article. That's exactly why the flora was so diverse and prolific during the jurassic age. Increased CO2 level in the atmosphere will not hurt us, but it will super charge the plant life... which in turn will absorb the CO2 and eventually reduce the level again. Nature provides it's very own regulation mechanism...
...but of course it's much more fun and way more profitable to predict the end of the world and whine with the alarmist crowd. So that's what many do these days...
Why? What's underneath the glaciers besides solid rock?One day we may be able to
There are vast areas of the planet that are of very limited use to us today because they are permanently frozen. Getting them into a more pliable temperature zone might not be such a bad thing.
Why? What's underneath the glaciers besides solid rock?
Bwahahaha. You can't believe that bullshit.