LJ_Reloaded
バクスター の
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2010
- Posts
- 21,217
The number one weapon a feminist uses in any heated debate is her threat of withdrawing VALIDATION of your manhood. She depends on being able to intimidate and belittle you by implying your uselessness and unattractiveness to women. It is her nuclear bomb, her Death Star superlaser, it is a superweapon that certain women drop whenever you dare to piss her off, or disagree with her. It is her way of reminding men that the entire meaning of a man is his relevance and usefulness to women.
Think about it. Creep shaming, nerd shaming, body shaming (penis size, attractiveness, height, etc), fedora this, neckbeard that, you can’t get laid, and all those insults. What do they all have in common? A male or female feminist trying to invalidate a man, trying to erase his manhood. Her message is women don’t like you and you’re some guy’s bitch, too. Feminists, thus, are as much patriarchs as the misogynists they claim to oppose. Or… maybe… this isn’t the Patriarchy, but rather, something women helped men create and then perpetuate?
To beat this, you need to understand the tale of the fish and the bicycle. Patricia Irene Dunn, an Australian politician and writer born in 1948, once came up with the phrase “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle” which feminist activist Gloria Steinem later made (in)famous worldwide. It has since become a rallying cry for modern feminists: it means, basically, that a woman doesn’t need a man. It asserts that men are useless and irrelevant.
But the damage that this invalidation does, goes both ways. Men are used to living in a desert of non-validation and invalidation. It defines our very existence. A male, by default, has to prove himself. We’re like cacti - we’re made for this hopeless desert.
Women, on the other hand, are practically given validation by default. Think of a tree in a rain forest. Them things grow big because they get lots of water.
Now put that tree in a desert and see what happens.
Let a woman realize that, contrary to her fantasies of importance and power, she’s really not wanted and nobody needs her, and her ego implodes, forming an event horizon of gloom into which countless happy pills (and cats) fall and are not seen again. Usually, though, before she collapses into this singularity of depression, the feminist, who says she needs men like a fish needs a bicycle, will call out for male feminists and white knights to come give her love, usually platonic, but maybe more than that if they look like a rugged bad boy or something. What does this narcissistic diva offer in return? Validation, of course. Validation for the validation-starved man-dogs that grovel at her feet and bite at her command.
There’s a reason why there’s not too many hermits out there: people crave validation, women included.
Now ask yourself, what happens during hyperinflation? Hyperinflation is when a currency - say, the German Mark (or maybe the US Dollar in the future?) has devalued to the point where it has completely lost its value. Basically, under hyperinflation, money becomes something barely worth wiping your ass with. Think of this applied to validation. The hyperinflation of validation means her approval is not even on the level of toilet paper. What she’s selling, or depriving you of, is worthless. It is like paper money during hyperinflation. You need it like a fish needs a bicycle.
May Patricia Dunn and Gloria Steinem weep bitter harpy tears at the detonation of their own nukes in their own faces.
This is not just theory or idle talk, folks. Devaluing the value of her validation has been shown to be devastating. Ever wonder why feminists are so scared of gay men? The most basic reason is not what they tell you - it’s more evident in how they act. The real reason they’re scared because many gay men don’t give a shit what a woman thinks about them, and good luck finding any gay man who gets hurt by the idea of his manhood being invalidated by a woman. He needs her validation like a fish needs a bicycle.
Gay men have an antidote to feminist and female privilege bullshit. Of course, the more intelligent reader will realize that this doesn’t mean that you have to be gay to see through and become immune to this invalidation tactic. You just have to wake up. You just have to get used to the idea that a woman’s validation is not worth its weight in gold just because she is a woman. Yes, some women are worth falling at their feet - but then so are some men. It’s called respect, and people - women included, imagine! - have to earn that. Many women think they’re owed respect just for being female and you, kind reader, owe it to yourself to refuse to accept that. You owe it to yourself to set a very high bar for a woman to become desirable, respectable, and for her validation to be worth more than something to wipe your ass with.
Now, I have an experiment for you. Repeat what the part about respect to another forum. Just that one part. Guaranteed, you will get one overwhelming response: YOU MISOGYNIST PIGGGG ARRRARRRGH!!! This is why you got that response - women, and their obsequious white knight validation-seekers, are offended at the idea that women aren’t just automatically owed respect. Men have to earn it, women are owed it, in their minds. Respect is validation, folks. It is yours to give or deny. You do not owe anyone either, any more than they owe it to you. These people can scream MISOGYNIST at you until hell freezes over but it means nothing if you do not comply. What does a fish care if the bicycle Nazi says “no bicycle for you”?
Of course, one man thumbing his nose at the over-inflated value of validation from a woman who has not earned your respect, isn’t going to do a lot of damage. She can always cry to other white knights to feed her narcissistic ego. But sometimes refusing to give a damn about her perceived monopoly over validation, gets to be infectious. Maybe 5% of all men are gay, and that’s an overexaggeration: but their lack of need for a woman’s validation, still scares the shit out of a lot of women. Now imagine the same thing happening among groups of heterosexual men. Herds of heterosexual fish, no longer needing a ride on their narcissistic bicycles…
Now watch radical feminists respond to this with attempts at ego invalidation…
Think about it. Creep shaming, nerd shaming, body shaming (penis size, attractiveness, height, etc), fedora this, neckbeard that, you can’t get laid, and all those insults. What do they all have in common? A male or female feminist trying to invalidate a man, trying to erase his manhood. Her message is women don’t like you and you’re some guy’s bitch, too. Feminists, thus, are as much patriarchs as the misogynists they claim to oppose. Or… maybe… this isn’t the Patriarchy, but rather, something women helped men create and then perpetuate?
To beat this, you need to understand the tale of the fish and the bicycle. Patricia Irene Dunn, an Australian politician and writer born in 1948, once came up with the phrase “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle” which feminist activist Gloria Steinem later made (in)famous worldwide. It has since become a rallying cry for modern feminists: it means, basically, that a woman doesn’t need a man. It asserts that men are useless and irrelevant.
But the damage that this invalidation does, goes both ways. Men are used to living in a desert of non-validation and invalidation. It defines our very existence. A male, by default, has to prove himself. We’re like cacti - we’re made for this hopeless desert.
Women, on the other hand, are practically given validation by default. Think of a tree in a rain forest. Them things grow big because they get lots of water.
Now put that tree in a desert and see what happens.
Let a woman realize that, contrary to her fantasies of importance and power, she’s really not wanted and nobody needs her, and her ego implodes, forming an event horizon of gloom into which countless happy pills (and cats) fall and are not seen again. Usually, though, before she collapses into this singularity of depression, the feminist, who says she needs men like a fish needs a bicycle, will call out for male feminists and white knights to come give her love, usually platonic, but maybe more than that if they look like a rugged bad boy or something. What does this narcissistic diva offer in return? Validation, of course. Validation for the validation-starved man-dogs that grovel at her feet and bite at her command.
There’s a reason why there’s not too many hermits out there: people crave validation, women included.
Now ask yourself, what happens during hyperinflation? Hyperinflation is when a currency - say, the German Mark (or maybe the US Dollar in the future?) has devalued to the point where it has completely lost its value. Basically, under hyperinflation, money becomes something barely worth wiping your ass with. Think of this applied to validation. The hyperinflation of validation means her approval is not even on the level of toilet paper. What she’s selling, or depriving you of, is worthless. It is like paper money during hyperinflation. You need it like a fish needs a bicycle.
May Patricia Dunn and Gloria Steinem weep bitter harpy tears at the detonation of their own nukes in their own faces.
This is not just theory or idle talk, folks. Devaluing the value of her validation has been shown to be devastating. Ever wonder why feminists are so scared of gay men? The most basic reason is not what they tell you - it’s more evident in how they act. The real reason they’re scared because many gay men don’t give a shit what a woman thinks about them, and good luck finding any gay man who gets hurt by the idea of his manhood being invalidated by a woman. He needs her validation like a fish needs a bicycle.
Gay men have an antidote to feminist and female privilege bullshit. Of course, the more intelligent reader will realize that this doesn’t mean that you have to be gay to see through and become immune to this invalidation tactic. You just have to wake up. You just have to get used to the idea that a woman’s validation is not worth its weight in gold just because she is a woman. Yes, some women are worth falling at their feet - but then so are some men. It’s called respect, and people - women included, imagine! - have to earn that. Many women think they’re owed respect just for being female and you, kind reader, owe it to yourself to refuse to accept that. You owe it to yourself to set a very high bar for a woman to become desirable, respectable, and for her validation to be worth more than something to wipe your ass with.
Now, I have an experiment for you. Repeat what the part about respect to another forum. Just that one part. Guaranteed, you will get one overwhelming response: YOU MISOGYNIST PIGGGG ARRRARRRGH!!! This is why you got that response - women, and their obsequious white knight validation-seekers, are offended at the idea that women aren’t just automatically owed respect. Men have to earn it, women are owed it, in their minds. Respect is validation, folks. It is yours to give or deny. You do not owe anyone either, any more than they owe it to you. These people can scream MISOGYNIST at you until hell freezes over but it means nothing if you do not comply. What does a fish care if the bicycle Nazi says “no bicycle for you”?
Of course, one man thumbing his nose at the over-inflated value of validation from a woman who has not earned your respect, isn’t going to do a lot of damage. She can always cry to other white knights to feed her narcissistic ego. But sometimes refusing to give a damn about her perceived monopoly over validation, gets to be infectious. Maybe 5% of all men are gay, and that’s an overexaggeration: but their lack of need for a woman’s validation, still scares the shit out of a lot of women. Now imagine the same thing happening among groups of heterosexual men. Herds of heterosexual fish, no longer needing a ride on their narcissistic bicycles…
Now watch radical feminists respond to this with attempts at ego invalidation…
