ambiguityperson
Experienced
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2013
- Posts
- 40
Please delete this thread.
Last edited:
Seeking feedback, submissive ladies
- Thread starter ambiguityperson
- Start date
honeysuckle35
Virgin
- Joined
- May 30, 2012
- Posts
- 9
It might work as a piece of fiction, though have to say it sounds like an opening scene to a CSI episode!!
In reality of course only a total muppet would meet with someone, naked in a hotel room, when they know nothing about them and scene with someone when they have had no discussion about hard limits. It could be good wank fodder but nothing more.
In reality of course only a total muppet would meet with someone, naked in a hotel room, when they know nothing about them and scene with someone when they have had no discussion about hard limits. It could be good wank fodder but nothing more.
chillipepper
Experienced
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2013
- Posts
- 62
What is that yellow liquid all over his cornflakes?
lovetoread
hello daddy
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2001
- Posts
- 42,978
I am seeing a nice ID channel show coming from this hookup.
Who in the world would agree to do something this stupid?
ambiguityperson
Experienced
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2013
- Posts
- 40
Okay, it's apparent now that I didn't make myself very clear with this. I thought posting this with the heading, "Seeking feedback," might convey my understanding that this scenario is imperfect and needs some work before I actually look for someone to fulfill this little fantasy of mine. I also thought that the Literotica community might show a little more open-mindedness and understanding than jumping to the conclusion that I'm a serial killer.
What I'm looking for is whether, given some kind of re-working of the details, someone would be as turned on by the idea of an encounter with someone whose identity would always be secret, before, during, and after the encounter, as I am. Perhaps I should have waited and established myself in the community a bit better before posting, but I'm naturally kind of antisocial and don't ingratiate myself with groups of people, online or in real life, very easily or very well. In any case, what I'm really getting at is whether it's worth my time to continue considering how exactly to work out a way for this to happen, or if the basic idea lacks broad enough appeal to entice someone to undertake this meeting, considering that whatever process I invent to make this work while eliminating or significantly reducing the danger factor may take some work on the part of my prospective counterpart.
But frankly, I'd like to address that danger factor as well. Really, when you get down to it, this encounter, as described, isn't that much more dangerous than other situations that women (and men, for that matter) face when putting themselves in an intimate situation with a man for the first time. I've met people through personal ads before, sometimes in public areas at first, sometimes privately after some exchange of words over the phone or online, but leading quite quickly to intimate one-on-one time in a private place, and believe me, if I were a homicidal sociopath, these brief exchanges and public meetings would have done nothing to provide any more security to my partners than the meeting I describe above. People put themselves in dangerous situations for the promise of sexual gratification every day, and unless you have CIA training or magical powers, talking to someone for a few minutes or a few hours is not going to reveal anything about their personalities that they wish to hide. Such get-to-know-you sessions provide little more than the illusion of security.
As for the lack of discussion of hard limits, etc., the combination of email exchange and safe words would cover that. While I picked and chose which details I focused on in the narrative in question, I do understand that other details would need to be discussed and other issues would be at play here. But again, the thrust of this thread is whether this is something that someone would be interested in doing if it could be worked out a different way.
I would welcome discussion of how to make this work with less of an apparent danger factor, but I do request that perhaps my future responders take less of a derogatory, mocking, or dismissive tone. If you think I'm a crackpot or a loon, please make that clear in a different way, namely, by not responding. Thank you.
What I'm looking for is whether, given some kind of re-working of the details, someone would be as turned on by the idea of an encounter with someone whose identity would always be secret, before, during, and after the encounter, as I am. Perhaps I should have waited and established myself in the community a bit better before posting, but I'm naturally kind of antisocial and don't ingratiate myself with groups of people, online or in real life, very easily or very well. In any case, what I'm really getting at is whether it's worth my time to continue considering how exactly to work out a way for this to happen, or if the basic idea lacks broad enough appeal to entice someone to undertake this meeting, considering that whatever process I invent to make this work while eliminating or significantly reducing the danger factor may take some work on the part of my prospective counterpart.
But frankly, I'd like to address that danger factor as well. Really, when you get down to it, this encounter, as described, isn't that much more dangerous than other situations that women (and men, for that matter) face when putting themselves in an intimate situation with a man for the first time. I've met people through personal ads before, sometimes in public areas at first, sometimes privately after some exchange of words over the phone or online, but leading quite quickly to intimate one-on-one time in a private place, and believe me, if I were a homicidal sociopath, these brief exchanges and public meetings would have done nothing to provide any more security to my partners than the meeting I describe above. People put themselves in dangerous situations for the promise of sexual gratification every day, and unless you have CIA training or magical powers, talking to someone for a few minutes or a few hours is not going to reveal anything about their personalities that they wish to hide. Such get-to-know-you sessions provide little more than the illusion of security.
As for the lack of discussion of hard limits, etc., the combination of email exchange and safe words would cover that. While I picked and chose which details I focused on in the narrative in question, I do understand that other details would need to be discussed and other issues would be at play here. But again, the thrust of this thread is whether this is something that someone would be interested in doing if it could be worked out a different way.
I would welcome discussion of how to make this work with less of an apparent danger factor, but I do request that perhaps my future responders take less of a derogatory, mocking, or dismissive tone. If you think I'm a crackpot or a loon, please make that clear in a different way, namely, by not responding. Thank you.
Similar threads
