Fox News

[RobDownSouth]

Of course the disingenuous dumb ass leaves out this part:

Media outlets such as Fox News and MSNBC have a negative impact on people’s current events knowledge


But even that is irrelevant because he is taking a study of 612 New Jerseyans as relevant, despite the fact it presents 0% statistical credibility.

But hey...It fits your sheep mentality so roll with it huh fat boy?

For someone who prides himself on his ability to perform complex mathematical functions, basic statistical probability theory appears to confuse you.

 

[phrodeau]

Of course the disingenuous dumb ass leaves out this part:

Media outlets such as Fox News and MSNBC have a negative impact on people’s current events knowledge


But even that is irrelevant because he is taking a study of 612 New Jerseyans as relevant, despite the fact it presents 0% statistical credibility.

But hey...It fits your sheep mentality so roll with it huh fat boy?

HAHAAAHAAHAA!!!

Go back to school.

 

[richard_daily]

I love the "but.... but..... MSNBC!" rants.

I can't think of a time I've ever watched that station for news, but don't mind the collectivists... they just need to get their talking points in, as the party informed them to do.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

For someone who prides himself on his ability to perform complex mathematical functions, basic statistical probability theory appears to confuse you.

HAHAAAHAAHAA!!!

Go back to school.

You both realize you are arguing direct quotes from an article you are trying to use to make a point?

Group fail!

 

[Dazzle1]

Meanwhile, back here in the reality-based world...

STUDY: Watching Only Fox News Makes You Less Informed Than Watching No News At All

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/stud...-watching-no-news-at-all-2012-5#ixzz2hKwEMqda

Sorry don't take something fro a liberal academic institution. Get a source that won't sqez the results

 

[RjThoughts]

Sorry don't take something fro a liberal academic institution. Get a source that won't sqez the results

AS opposed to those "bastions of Conservative Academia", like Liberty, Regent, and Bob Jones?

 

[about_average]

Sorry don't take something fro a liberal academic institution. Get a source that won't sqez the results

Like Fox "news" right?

 

[RobDownSouth]

You both realize you are arguing direct quotes from an article you are trying to use to make a point?

Group fail!

Actually, you stupid son of a bitch, the problem is with YOUR reading comprehension.

The study was conducted with over 1000 randomly selected adults. Had you stayed awake in Intro to Statistical Probability (instead of allowing the instructor to cornhole you for a passing grade), you might have learned that 1000 random test subjects correlates to a high degree of probability. Ask your daddy to explain.

The 612 figure refers to a previous study. It's irrelevant to the discussion, despite your assertions to the contrary.

Now do a math trick for us!

 

[RobDownSouth]

Sorry don't take something fro a liberal academic institution. Get a source that won't sqez the results

Is "Shoot teh Messenger" all j-w got?

Then j-w got nothing.

 

[dan_c00000]

AS opposed to those "bastions of Conservative Academia", like Liberty, Regent, and Bob Jones?

Did you know Jesus wrote the Constitution AND gave us the wheel? You should read the textbook lists for some of those "colleges".

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Actually, you stupid son of a bitch, the problem is with YOUR reading comprehension.

The study was conducted with over 1000 randomly selected adults. Had you stayed awake in Intro to Statistical Probability (instead of allowing the instructor to cornhole you for a passing grade), you might have learned that 1000 random test subjects correlates to a high degree of probability. Ask your daddy to explain.

The 612 figure refers to a previous study. It's irrelevant to the discussion, despite your assertions to the contrary.

Now do a math trick for us!

Actually you fat ignorant fuck, if your reading comprehension was a little better you would understand "it is a follow-up to a 2011 survey of 612 New Jerseyans"

You would also understand that the study backs up my original statement that both Fox and MSNBC viewers are idiots. even if the study is partisan and flawed.

If you understood what you where reading at all you would understand that less than 50% of Fox or MSNBC viewers answered simple questions correctly and you, in your infinite stupidity, are arguing who is the tallest midget in the room.

If you where not such a miserable failure in everything you do you would also understand that neither 612 or 1000 present credibility.

If you where not to busy stuffing your fat fucking face you may have read the actual study, put out by a liberal think tank, and know that it is further flawed in that it disproportionately polled conservatives. You may have even have had a shot at understanding their very first question was flawed and that "As I read the list, just say “yes” if you got news from that source any time in the past week" does not effectively ID someone as to what news program they watch the most.

But that is a lot for someone like you to understand. I may as well ask you if you understand that your wife and kid left you because you are a miserable human being...not just because your fat and stupid.

 

[RjThoughts]

Did you know Jesus wrote the Constitution AND gave us the wheel? You should read the textbook lists for some of those "colleges".

I should, since I had a resume come across my desk last week from someone that graduated from Bob Jones

 

[RjThoughts]

OMFG!

Bibical studies classes for a Computer Science degree? WTF?

 

[RjThoughts]

BJU class, MANDITORY for Computer Science degree

BI 499: APOLOGETICS & WORLDVIEW 3 CR.

An analysis and defense of the Christian worldview, together with an analysis and refutation of secular and religious alternative worldviews. The course will equip students to defend the core biblical doctrines and refute spurious philosophical, historical, archeological and scientific claims against the Bible. The course presents a brief history of the Apologetics discipline and important Christian thinkers. The course addresses significant historical and contemporary thinkers and their objections to biblical Christianity.

Basically, it's a course that teaches people to defend their version of Christianity. Unbelievable!!!

 

[Killswitch]

Dances with Falsehoods....lol

That never gets old.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Actually you fat ignorant fuck, if your reading comprehension was a little better you would understand "it is a follow-up to a 2011 survey of 612 New Jerseyans"
You would also understand that the study backs up my original statement that both Fox and MSNBC viewers are idiots. even if the study is partisan and flawed.
If you understood what you where reading at all you would understand that less than 50% of Fox or MSNBC viewers answered simple questions correctly and you, in your infinite stupidity, are arguing who is the tallest midget in the room.
If you where not such a miserable failure in everything you do you would also understand that neither 612 or 1000 present credibility.
If you where not to busy stuffing your fat fucking face you may have read the actual study, put out by a liberal think tank, and know that it is further flawed in that it disproportionately polled conservatives. You may have even have had a shot at understanding their very first question was flawed and that "As I read the list, just say “yes” if you got news from that source any time in the past week" does not effectively ID someone as to what news program they watch the most.
But that is a lot for someone like you to understand. I may as well ask you if you understand that your wife and kid left you because you are a miserable human being...not just because your fat and stupid.

Just like your daddy, when you get caught you try and bluster your way out.

Doesn't work for him, won't work for you.

Notice, folks, how I'm talking about statistical probability, and VatAss restates my remarks as talking about "credibility".

That's typical of the RWCJ here: can't refudiate a position? Make up one, assign it to your opponent, then criticize them for "their" opinion.

Now do a math trick for us, VatAss!!

 

[dan_c00000]

OMFG!

Bibical studies classes for a Computer Science degree? WTF?

BJU class, MANDITORY for Computer Science degree

BI 499: APOLOGETICS & WORLDVIEW 3 CR.

An analysis and defense of the Christian worldview, together with an analysis and refutation of secular and religious alternative worldviews. The course will equip students to defend the core biblical doctrines and refute spurious philosophical, historical, archeological and scientific claims against the Bible. The course presents a brief history of the Apologetics discipline and important Christian thinkers. The course addresses significant historical and contemporary thinkers and their objections to biblical Christianity.

Basically, it's a course that teaches people to defend their version of Christianity. Unbelievable!!!

How said is that? Their "BA degree" counts the same as mine. I had to write real papers and use non-Biblical sources.

To be fair I also went to a real college.

 

[RjThoughts]

How said is that? Their "BA degree" counts the same as mine. I had to write real papers and use non-Biblical sources.

To be fair I also went to a real college.

It's a BS, and not a Bull Shit!

My son's taking courses for a two-year degree in one of the many Computer Science disciplines one State University of New York community college has to offer. He'll be taking MORE core computer and math courses than the person that attended BJU did in 4. Sad, really is

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Just like your daddy, when you get caught you try and bluster your way out.

Doesn't work for him, won't work for you.

Notice, folks, how I'm talking about statistical probability, and VatAss restates my remarks as talking about "credibility".

That's typical of the RWCJ here: can't refudiate a position? Make up one, assign it to your opponent, then criticize them for "their" opinion.

Now do a math trick for us, VatAss!!

Just like the fat dumb fuck you are......

Notice folks how he ignores the fact this flawed study backs up my original claim and every point on why this is a flawed study is ignored.

Notice, folks how I mentioned Statistical credibility in the first post, he changed it to probability, I mention credibility again and he cries about probability like I am assigning a position.

I am sure you do. Just as sure as I am fat ass doesn't get it.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Just like the fat dumb fuck you are......

Notice folks how he ignores the fact this flawed study backs up my original claim and every point on why this is a flawed study is ignored.

Notice, folks how I mentioned Statistical credibility in the first post, he changed it to probability, I mention credibility again and he cries about probability like I am assigning a position.

I am sure you do. Just as sure as I am fat ass doesn't get it.

There was no "flawed study", except in that fever swamp of your mind.

Still trying to bluster your way out through repetition, I see.

Do a math trick for us!

 

[Que]

Cable news as a whole has not been real news for years. Anyone who thinks it is, is an idiot. Whether it is MSNBC or Fox you are equally ill informed.

Then there is a whole other type of stupid who get their news from Jon Stewart.

This is the best post in this thread.

I love the "but.... but..... MSNBC!" rants.

I can't think of a time I've ever watched that station for news, but don't mind the collectivists... they just need to get their talking points in, as the party informed them to do.

You need to avoid any word over two syllables.

"Collectivists" are people who believe that planning is best left to the collective. You know ideologues to believe in central planning that would include your basic communists, socialist, liberals, Progressives. Whatever you want to call people who think government is the answer this week.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

There was no "flawed study", except in that fever swamp of your mind.

Still trying to bluster your way out through repetition, I see.

Do a math trick for us!

I having giving you fact after fact and you still stick to the same shit above.

Talk about bluster through repetition.

Slow down and try to think of something to refute my points. Put the twinky down and concentrate fat boy.

 

[Que]

BJU class, MANDITORY for Computer Science degree

BI 499: APOLOGETICS & WORLDVIEW 3 CR.

An analysis and defense of the Christian worldview, together with an analysis and refutation of secular and religious alternative worldviews. The course will equip students to defend the core biblical doctrines and refute spurious philosophical, historical, archeological and scientific claims against the Bible. The course presents a brief history of the Apologetics discipline and important Christian thinkers. The course addresses significant historical and contemporary thinkers and their objections to biblical Christianity.

Basically, it's a course that teaches people to defend their version of Christianity. Unbelievable!!!

How is that different from any liberal arts degree, Other than the fact that you disagree with their worldview and they disagree with yours. You're both simply taught in college To defend your quote worldview unquote.

As if one's world view has any objective Bearing on reality and facts as they exist. Not as you wish them to be. Take for example Keynesian economics completely disproven yet still taught as if its reasonable because it supports somebody's worldview.

 

[Que]

BJU class, MANDITORY for Computer Science degree

BI 499: APOLOGETICS & WORLDVIEW 3 CR.

An analysis and defense of the Christian worldview, together with an analysis and refutation of secular and religious alternative worldviews. The course will equip students to defend the core biblical doctrines and refute spurious philosophical, historical, archeological and scientific claims against the Bible. The course presents a brief history of the Apologetics discipline and important Christian thinkers. The course addresses significant historical and contemporary thinkers and their objections to biblical Christianity.

Basically, it's a course that teaches people to defend their version of Christianity. Unbelievable!!!

How is that different from any liberal arts degree? Other than the fact that you disagree with their worldview and they disagree with yours. You're both simply taught in college To defend your quote worldview unquote.

Writing a paper based on quote real sources. What is a real source a book written by some professors who agrees with your professor? I didn't see where you were taught in college critical thinking skills.

Do you chortle with derision just as much at the description of t courses in Eastern philosophy. Or courses in women's studies

As if one's world view has any objective bearing on reality and facts as they exist. Not as you wish them to be. Take for example Keynesian economics completely disproven yet still taught as if its reasonable because it supports somebody's worldview.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I having giving you fact after fact and you still stick to the same shit above.

Talk about bluster through repetition.

Slow down and try to think of something to refute my points. Put the twinky down and concentrate fat boy.

There was no "flaw".

A poll with a random sample of 1,000 people has margin of sampling error of 3%. 1,000 people is the generally accepted norm for polling, your whining to the contrary notwithstanding

A 3% margin of error means that if the same procedure is used a large number of times, 95% of the time the true population average will be within the 95% confidence interval of the sample estimate plus or minus 3%.

Google "confidence interval" if you want to know more.

Let's see you try and refute any of the above.

Watch his response folks...watch how he'll load it up with non-sequiturs, ad hominem and red herrings.