Where is the Inflation?

There's plenty of incentive for the Fed and the government in general to cover up the effects of debauching the nation's currency. Only the naive or the ignorant fail to understand.

Sissy bitch, you've been wringing your hands about "debauchin' the currency" for almost 5 years now.

Every time we ask you to provide evidence to back your claim you fold faster than Superman on laundry day.

Nobody believes you.
 
What's their incentive to do that?

what is the incentive to ignore

IRS

FAST AND FURIOUS

BENGHAZI

THE NUDGE

TEH SPYING

all the OTHER SHIT


I know

DRESSAGAE!

MACCAU!

HAIRCUTS!

ROCKS!

DOGS AND CAR ROOFS!
 
There's plenty of incentive for the Fed and the government in general to cover up the effects of debauching the nation's currency. Only the naive or the ignorant fail to understand.

And theyre, what?, 90% of America.

I noticed something from the Detroit debacle. Anytime someone claims youre too dum to handle your own retirement money and think Obama should do it, translate the blabber to this: WE WANNA FUCK YOU OUTTA YOU MONEY CHUMP.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No need to engage the disingenuous idiot on the purpose of the wheel, or elementary economics.

ah, yes, "elementary economics".....tell us again how a stock is technically a loan to a company, with a guaranteed rate of return and a guaranteed buy-back price.

Surely you remember that thread, the only one in Lit history where your fellow "marine" AJ stabbed you in the back and sided with Merc against you.
 
Umm, I'm confused. AJ, AJ's GF and Vettebigot are claiming that the Fed has been cooking the books since 1929 to protect Obama?
 
I have Mark Levin's new book The Liberty Amendments on order, here is an excerpt that brings centralized authority into sharp focus:

"What was to be a relatively innocuous federal government, operating from a defined enumeration of specific grants of power, has become an ever-present and unaccountable force,...".

"It is the nation's largest creditor, debtor, lender, employer, consumer, contractor, grantor, property owner, tenant, insurer, health-care provider, and pension guarantor. Moreover, with aggrandized police powers, what it does not control directly it bans or mandates by regulation. For example, the federal government regulates most things in your bathroom, laundry room, and kitchen, as well as the mortgage you hold on your house. It designs your automobile and dictates the kind of fuel it uses. It regulates your baby's toys, crib, and stroller; plans your children's school curriculum and lunch menu; and administers their student loans in college. At your place of employment, the federal government oversees everything from the racial, gender, and age diversity of the workforce to the hours, wages, and benefits paid. Indeed, the question is not what the federal government regulates, but what it does not. And it makes you wonder — how can a people incapable of selecting their own light bulbs and toilets possess enough competence to vote for their own rulers and fill out complicated tax returns?"
Wow, that is almost entirely wrong. There are other governments besides federal, but the author seems completely ignorant of them.
 
~View Post~

Learn how to read motherfucker, read the fucking article, and knock off with the misquotes and phony assertions.:rolleyes:

Back to IGGY, unworthy clown.

Go suck another dick, bigot.
 
I have Mark Levin's new book The Liberty Amendments on order, here is an excerpt that brings centralized authority into sharp focus:

"What was to be a relatively innocuous federal government, operating from a defined enumeration of specific grants of power, has become an ever-present and unaccountable force,...".

"It is the nation's largest creditor, debtor, lender, employer, consumer, contractor, grantor, property owner, tenant, insurer, health-care provider, and pension guarantor. Moreover, with aggrandized police powers, what it does not control directly it bans or mandates by regulation. For example, the federal government regulates most things in your bathroom, laundry room, and kitchen, as well as the mortgage you hold on your house. It designs your automobile and dictates the kind of fuel it uses. It regulates your baby's toys, crib, and stroller; plans your children's school curriculum and lunch menu; and administers their student loans in college. At your place of employment, the federal government oversees everything from the racial, gender, and age diversity of the workforce to the hours, wages, and benefits paid. Indeed, the question is not what the federal government regulates, but what it does not. And it makes you wonder — how can a people incapable of selecting their own light bulbs and toilets possess enough competence to vote for their own rulers and fill out complicated tax returns?"

Thanks I'll order a copy. But I aint cancelling the order for TRAILER TRAMPS!
 
The book will be another best seller for him. It is a well studied legal pathway using Article V of the Constitution for the states to amend the Constitution without the participation of the Congress, the Executive, or the SCOTUS. He provides an interesting legal study of the amendment procedure without the Constitutional convention method we've all envisioned, he explains the intentions of George Mason and James Madison in amending the original article and why the language was needed and how it fits perfectly the situation we find ourselves in today. You can read about it here:

http://www.westernfreepress.com/201...itution-article-v-and-the-liberty-amendments/

Mark Levin hates the United States Constitution so much that I suspect he's a Vietnam-era marine (the "gold standard" for Constitution haters).

He's selling quick-n-easy bypass-the-federal-government Amendment snake oil that will not pass muster in any federal court.

True Believers™ such as the Vettepussy and JamesBRecluse are more than willing to swallow his lies, and not because they enjoy swallowing as much as their mothers used to.
 
Mark Levin hates the United States Constitution so much that I suspect he's a Vietnam-era marine (the "gold standard" for Constitution haters).

He's selling quick-n-easy bypass-the-federal-government Amendment snake oil that will not pass muster in any federal court.

True Believers™ such as the Vettepussy and JamesBRecluse are more than willing to swallow his lies, and not because they enjoy swallowing as much as their mothers used to.

Fatty gave up kids and switched to moms. :cool:
 
You're an ignorant shit pile, you aren't competent enough to comment. Shut the fuck up.:rolleyes:

LMAO. This from constitutional scholar Vettebigot that gets pwnd in every discussion of con law he has the misfortune to get into.
 
The book will be another best seller for him. It is a well studied legal pathway using Article V of the Constitution for the states to amend the Constitution without the participation of the Congress, the Executive, or the SCOTUS. He provides an interesting legal study of the amendment procedure without the Constitutional convention method we've all envisioned, he explains the intentions of George Mason and James Madison in amending the original article and why the language was needed and how it fits perfectly the situation we find ourselves in today. You can read about it here:

http://www.westernfreepress.com/201...itution-article-v-and-the-liberty-amendments/

The entire text of Article 5 leaves no wiggle room other than a Constitutional Convention or Congress proposing Amendments to the Constitution, despite Mr. Levin's "expert" Constitutional Law opinion. :rolleyes:

Article V
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
 
You're an ignorant shit pile, you aren't competent enough to comment. Shut the fuck up.:rolleyes:

Levin wants to bypass the Constitution to amend the Constitution.

People such as yourself, who realize they don't have the votes necessary to enact the amendments they want, whole-heartedly endorse this extra-Constitutional short-circuit.

Once again, you bring great shame to yourself, your family name, and the United States Marine Corps.
 
Back
Top