What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?
- Thread starter Ulaven_Demorte
- Start date
- Status
IrezumiKiss
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Posts
- 74,229
I know a special pathetic bottom-bitch shitstain who's gonna miss his leash-tugging top when he goes on his road trip vay-kay pretty soon.
Assuming the top won't be checking in daily as usual to derp his fears away during his vacation because, well...pressed bitch.
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_md3ukoOYpm1qa6g1m.gif
Assuming the top won't be checking in daily as usual to derp his fears away during his vacation because, well...pressed bitch.
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_md3ukoOYpm1qa6g1m.gif
richard_daily
Slut Whisperer
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 36,898
So you finally admit you cybered and backed up a guy hiding behind the cipher of a woman.
'Bout time. Knew you was a stand-up-to-take-a-piss guy after all, Vette.
It's the first brave thing he's done in his life.
mercury14
Pragmatic Metaphysician
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2009
- Posts
- 22,158
Sean Renaud
The West Coast Pop
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2004
- Posts
- 59,288
That's probably not a terrible place to start.
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
deceptive bullshit you PIECE OF WORTHLESS SHIT
mercury14
Pragmatic Metaphysician
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2009
- Posts
- 22,158
The truth stings, doesn't it?
koalabear
~Armed and Fuzzy~
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
- Posts
- 101,964
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
U
unregistered
Guest
Ajax_Prime
Fuck the Poor
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
- Posts
- 1,247
If what I'm quoting is 'random verbage,' but it's pulled directly from your link...what does that say about your post?
Walking in to any room with business professionals and trumpeting "look guys, the gamma on my losses is decreasing!" still shows you're an idiot who's losing money.
Demographics have accounted for only half of the decline. In addition, Chart 8 in the attached shows the LFPR of those 55 and older has increased, while those aged 16-24 has decreased.
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Conjecture? This is now old news.
Bureau of Economic Analysis
Welcome to 2 pages ago.
Last edited:
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Another Horrible Poll For Obamacare, Just 18% Think The Law Will Improve Their Health Care “At Least Somewhat”…
The hits just keep on coming.
Via National Journal:
Opponents of President Obama’s health care law overwhelmingly believe the Affordable Care Act will worsen the quality of their care, and even a plurality of the law’s supporters don’t think it will improve their health care, though they think it will benefit the poor and uninsured.
These findings from this week’s United Technologies/National JournalCongressional Connection Poll underscore why the law has become so politically precarious for the White House. Its primary goal was to expand access to millions of uninsured Americans, but voters are registering the most intense opposition out of fear it will adversely affect the quality of their care in the process. And even the law’s boosters are skeptical of its impact on their care.
Those who disapprove of the measure feel more strongly than those who approve. In a new CBS News poll released Wednesday, the majority of respondents, 54 percent, said they disapprove of the health care law, while only 36 percent approved. But the poll also explored the intensity of those feelings: Only 15 percent “strongly approve,” 21 percent “somewhat approve,” 18 percent “somewhat disapprove,” and 36 percent “strongly disapprove.”
Overall, this week’s poll found just 18 percent of Americans believed the law will improve their health care “at least somewhat,” one-third believe it will make their care worse, and 41 percent think it won’t have much of an impact at all.
The hits just keep on coming.
Via National Journal:
Opponents of President Obama’s health care law overwhelmingly believe the Affordable Care Act will worsen the quality of their care, and even a plurality of the law’s supporters don’t think it will improve their health care, though they think it will benefit the poor and uninsured.
These findings from this week’s United Technologies/National JournalCongressional Connection Poll underscore why the law has become so politically precarious for the White House. Its primary goal was to expand access to millions of uninsured Americans, but voters are registering the most intense opposition out of fear it will adversely affect the quality of their care in the process. And even the law’s boosters are skeptical of its impact on their care.
Those who disapprove of the measure feel more strongly than those who approve. In a new CBS News poll released Wednesday, the majority of respondents, 54 percent, said they disapprove of the health care law, while only 36 percent approved. But the poll also explored the intensity of those feelings: Only 15 percent “strongly approve,” 21 percent “somewhat approve,” 18 percent “somewhat disapprove,” and 36 percent “strongly disapprove.”
Overall, this week’s poll found just 18 percent of Americans believed the law will improve their health care “at least somewhat,” one-third believe it will make their care worse, and 41 percent think it won’t have much of an impact at all.
koalabear
~Armed and Fuzzy~
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2001
- Posts
- 101,964
THIS explains Obama and Curry and UD and NIGGAZOOM and Robber South
Scientists Make Mice “Remember” Things That Didn’t Happen.
U
unregistered
Guest
RobDownSouth
No Kings
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 77,655
Okay, let's review...
I posted a link showing a steep decline in the rate of deficit growth. Your response was to splutter "but...but...teh GAMMA!"
Best wishes selling that spin to the general public.
Next you decided to try and spin both the unemployment rate and the GDP.
The unemployment rate is looking better compared to historical averages, so you want to discard it, disrgard historical widespread U-3 reporting and use the U-6/LPFR now...Why? because Obama!
But, out of the other side of your mouth...
The slightly revised GDP calculation (Research and development is now a capital expenditure, not an expense) looks good compared to historical numbers, so you want to retroactively restate 80+ years of GDP numbers. Again, why? Because Obama!
The only constant in your incoherent babbling seems to be a need to present the government numbers in the worst possible light for the Obama administration. You treat economic indicators like a Chinese restaurant menu, i.e. "one from column A, one from column B..."
You can't expect to be taken seriously with your economic pastiche.
RobDownSouth
No Kings
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 77,655
He's a better man than you will ever be, you fucking coward.
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
RobDownSouth
No Kings
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 77,655
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Ajax_Prime
Fuck the Poor
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
- Posts
- 1,247
So in other words, besides not understanding anything beyond 1+1, you've got nothing to refute any of what I have mentioned. Those weren't links from Fox News, they were your own, and from the Administration you're so gung ho about.
Great. And YOU'RE supposed to be our shining beacon? I mean FUCK dude, that GDP thing is going on 5 months old, and you had zero clue.
"Conjecture."
Lame.
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
