lovecraft68
Bad Doggie
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Posts
- 46,365
You're right.
(or that I want him to) Unless you want him, too!
Sigh, see details, details!
Now see you know I wasn't lying when I said in the OP I still struggle with grammar!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're right.
(or that I want him to) Unless you want him, too!
To think bout it LC when you looked at my story. I can't remember what it was but it wasn't major. Either way I went back redid it and doubled the length.
And you didn't still have some requests along those lines anyway? What is the Literotica readership coming to?! *shakes head*
About the thread topic: Yes, a content editor is supposed to point out all the inconsistencies or 'holes' in the story. There have been instances in the past when I edited for Lit where I did just that and the authors refused to budge on their version of reality within the story. No, it wasn't sci-fi either. In such cases, I refused to be associated with the story anymore.
When such things happen in my stories (and yes, there have been a few places where the character removes her panties twice or was lying down, but lies down again in the heat of the moment, etc.), I submit an edited version as soon as possible because nothing really makes me cringe as much as such things happening in my stories.![]()
Yeah those are the type of errors that make it through occasionally. "Do I want to re-read the entire story to catch every reference to my decision to change a character's hair color, or do I think I caught them all?" Burns me almost every time.
Yeah those are the type of errors that make it through occasionally. "Do I want to re-read the entire story to catch every reference to my decision to change a character's hair color, or do I think I caught them all?" Burns me almost every time.
Just posting this because of an e-mail I received this morning. Last week an author who has commented on several of my stories reached out to me and asked if I would look at a story for him.
I said I would, but as always stressed I still struggle with grammar and I am not an editor, but would be happy to read it and give him some general feedback about what I liked an didn't and why.
Now their response was that was fine and the reason they liked my work is I am consistent throughout my stories and seem to pay attention to small details and inject as much reality in the fantasy as possible and that is what he is looking for is "holes" in the story.
One thing an editor on Literotica should not do is come on the forum and discuss a specific case where the specific-case author can identify they are being discussed here. It destroys author-editor trust in privacy all across the board.
Well, this is an interesting way of me, me, meing and puffing yourself up on the forum, I must say.![]()
No, its a discussion that people here are freely contributing too.
Shove another lemon in your bitter puss will ya?
I'm not his editor read the first post, I explain I do not edit. I can only give opinions. I also noted twice the story itself is good.
Besides as for author/Editor trust I abide by that because trust me, there are two people who continue to add their names to the list in the editors forum that I would like to publicly warn people not to go anywhere near, but feel that would be wrong.
Then again saying you're an editor when you know you're no better than the author looking for help is wrong as well.
Sr71plt has a point here, I was keen on finding out who the person is. But Sr71plt is correct I agree with him about the confidence you were trusted with. You do seem to get off on attacking other. I too need to pull back and re-humanize.
And had the story been up, you would have been one more view and a potential voter and commentor.
Such a disservice.
And had the story been up, you would have been one more view and a potential voter and commentor.
Such a disservice.
Ditto.One thing an editor on Literotica should not do is come on the forum and discuss a specific case where the specific-case author can identify they are being discussed here. It destroys author-editor trust in privacy all across the board.
So because you claim you aren't an editor, that makes it all right to openly discuss this person's story? Offering opinions isn't part of editing?I'm not his editor read the first post, I explain I do not edit. I can only give opinions. I also noted twice the story itself is good.
Besides as for author/Editor trust I abide by that because trust me, there are two people who continue to add their names to the list in the editors forum that I would like to publicly warn people not to go anywhere near, but feel that would be wrong.
Then again saying you're an editor when you know you're no better than the author looking for help is wrong as well.
Hmmm, Hard to remember, I think it was just a couple of "are you kidding" phrases that would have been straight of of really bad 70's porn. I was like "no one says that!"
I recall the story had a great "feel" to it.
Whether the story is good or not isn't the point. If you wanted to start a discussion on details, you should have either used examples from your own work or made something up just for the thread.
nobody said the fact that the werewolf put on a condom was stupid although they tore apart lots of other aspects of the writing.