Eric Holder: Drone strikes against Americans on U.S. soil are legal

Busybody

We are ALL BUSYBODY!
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Posts
55,323
Eric Holder: Drone strikes against Americans on U.S. soil are legal



Holder noted that Paul’s question was “entirely hypothetical [and] unlikely to occur,” but cited the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks as the type of incidents that might provoke such a response.

“Were such an emergency to arise, I would examine the particular facts and circumstances before advising the President on the scope of his authority,” he concluded.

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, an attorney and Judiciary Committee member, told The Washington Examiner last month that the drone policy so far outlined by the administration is too vague.

“That has the potential to swallow the rule,” Lee said after the drone program white paper was leaked. “If you’re going to regard somebody as presenting an imminent threat of an attack on the U.S. simply because you have concluded that they are an ‘operational leader’ or they are involved in planning an attack in one way or another, you find yourself giving way to much discretion to the government.”

Lee said that the White House should release the formal legal analysis underpinning the drone program. “We know that in some instances where the government has released its legal analysis, it gets it wrong,” he said.
 
When Bushco

Listened IN on TELEPHONE calls that TERRORISTS made OUTSIDE the US

HE WAS KILLED



If this was done under Bushco, thousands would be in the streets, the DUMZ would be up in arms!!!!!!!
 
yes

EVENTUALLY

WhoSane Obama and COLOREDCUNT will die and be eaten by WORMS who will throw up:D
 
Eric Holder: Drone strikes against Americans on U.S. soil are legal



Holder noted that Paul’s question was “entirely hypothetical [and] unlikely to occur,” but cited the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks as the type of incidents that might provoke such a response.

“Were such an emergency to arise, I would examine the particular facts and circumstances before advising the President on the scope of his authority,” he concluded.

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, an attorney and Judiciary Committee member, told The Washington Examiner last month that the drone policy so far outlined by the administration is too vague.

“That has the potential to swallow the rule,” Lee said after the drone program white paper was leaked. “If you’re going to regard somebody as presenting an imminent threat of an attack on the U.S. simply because you have concluded that they are an ‘operational leader’ or they are involved in planning an attack in one way or another, you find yourself giving way to much discretion to the government.”

Lee said that the White House should release the formal legal analysis underpinning the drone program. “We know that in some instances where the government has released its legal analysis, it gets it wrong,” he said.

Now there worried about things being legal:cool:
 
When Bushco

Listened IN on TELEPHONE calls that TERRORISTS made OUTSIDE the US

HE WAS KILLED



If this was done under Bushco, thousands would be in the streets, the DUMZ would be up in arms!!!!!!!

:cool:
 
2001-2008, the NIGGERZ of the world, of the US of the D Party screamed WAR CRIMINAL and worse at BushCo

Hung him in effigy

had mass demonstrations

Now, the same things are done, only in triplicate and nary a PEEP

Thou shalt defend DA NIGGER
 
It is a dereliction of sanity

To attack that which will defend our country

Because of a LETTER

Like

R
 
It's a natural progression in the development of the law and order 'conservatives'


First we had cops that responded to crime in a local, disconnected way. Then we had phones and telegraphs that transmitted details of a crime and criminals across jurisdictions.

Then we had cops sitting behind billboards in their cars, waiting for an outlaw.

Then we armed the cops with radar.

Then we installed surveillance cameras everywhere so a cop in a remote location could watch the pubic.

Then we gave them helicopters and airplanes to keep an eye on things.

Then Satellites.

Now we have drones.

Why are the 'conservatives' drawing the line here? How many times has CornBoy wished for the execution of those who didn't conform with his ideal of "civil society?"

This is an odd place to take a stance as the law and order types have already let the horse out of the barn.
 
Is there a good, drone-strike website we can catch the action?
 
phones and telegraphs
radar.
surveillance cameras
helicopters and airplanes
Satellites.

You forgot Red-Light Cameras and wiretapping technology.

Drones up next!

Then tracking micro-chips embedded just behind the ear. Make that "ID Chips" which will be promoted for health-and-safety of the children. We must think of the children.
 
You forgot Red-Light Cameras and wiretapping technology.

Drones up next!

Then tracking micro-chips embedded just behind the ear. Make that "ID Chips" which will be promoted for health-and-safety of the children. We must think of the children.

Can we use bar codes on the forehead first? It has biblical implications that will appeal to our conservatives.
 
Back
Top