Sean Renaud
The West Coast Pop
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2004
- Posts
- 59,549
Why would you need to negotiate a new labor deal every two years?
Flexibility.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would you need to negotiate a new labor deal every two years?
I never said I owned the business I managed for 30 years. I simply managed all aspects of it and reported to the owners and the Board. Through almost 15 labor contracts that business never lost money, and that didn't happon because I'm stupid or didn't have a better idea, just saying. So blow that smoke somewhere else.
Try your theory on your fellow students.
In thinking about it, this post by vetteman is quite telling.
Note he doesn't address whether the business was profitable, merely that it "never lost money." We are left to wonder if the product/service was priced competitively, or in the absence of competition, priced for maximum profitability.
Instead, vetteman speaks to only what he knows, "labour contracts", which explains why he sees - and is adamant about - only one-half of the solution to our current fiscal dilemma. 'Cut, cut, cut' is all he knows. Can't fathom the other side of the revenue equation.
Paraphrasing Pope, "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing."
Good luck on holding the commies off much longer Koala. I think you may have fucked us over worse than I thought. I wasn't expecting shit to start turning for at least another five or six years but it might be time to button the hatches and watch the chaos. Specially if that double dip that I heard (but find unlikely) hits next year.
"Manager" of a business that has a board? Sounds like he was a manager of a franchise and submitted the monthly p&l. Or he was the secretary of a large corporation. "No, Mr. Smith is in a meeting. Can I take a message? "
What double dip, the brilliant voters put the same idiots back in office and expect different results.![]()
What double dip, the brilliant voters put the same idiots back in office and expect different results.![]()
Judging by the MASSIVE propaganda effort mounted by the state sponsored media, there's no doubt the Pubs will get the blame for Obama's assault on America.
No, being humanitarian we knock them out before taking their legs.
In thinking about it, this post by Vettebigot is quite telling.
Note he doesn't address whether the business was profitable, merely that it "never lost money." We are left to wonder if the product/service was priced competitively, or in the absence of competition, priced for maximum profitability.
Instead, Vettebigot speaks to only what he knows, "labour contracts", which explains why he sees - and is adamant about - only one-half of the solution to our current fiscal dilemma. 'Cut, cut, cut' is all he knows. Can't fathom the other side of the revenue equation.
Paraphrasing Pope, "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing."
You're tired.
We grab them by hand, other times we put a light on them and then tap on the head with a Crappie jig, and being greedy Democrats always trying to steal things that don't belong to them, they get nailed on the hook.
Maybe they don't.
Maybe they don't trust either party left to its own devices.
So if we fall off the cliff, who will they distrust more?
They draw you in like a hyena, don't they ?
Whatever counselor, meanwhile kiss old duke.![]()
Who cares as long as we have a conservative from whatever party? Pubs have to get back to their conservative roots their new role as neo-statists will fail. They'd have to communize the nation to out do the Democrats.