What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

Status
Not open for further replies.
question fer ya market savy bunch.
the worlds debt is based on imginary numbers. like making money that has no real backing.
all of a sudden ALL world markets fall. who the fuck is buying something that is absolutely FUCKING WORTHLESS$$$$???????????????????????
are you really THAT STUPID???????????
 
question fer ya market savy bunch.
the worlds debt is based on imginary numbers. like making money that has no real backing.
all of a sudden ALL world markets fall. who the fuck is buying something that is absolutely FUCKING WORTHLESS$$$$???????????????????????
are you really THAT STUPID???????????

Um, when the markets fall, it means people are selling.
 
question fer ya market savy bunch.
the worlds debt is based on imginary numbers. like making money that has no real backing.
all of a sudden ALL world markets fall. who the fuck is buying something that is absolutely FUCKING WORTHLESS$$$$???????????????????????
are you really THAT STUPID???????????

this wont really answer you

BUT

did you know, most of EuroPUKE has most of their gold reserves stored at teh NY FED? that gold is upposed to back their assets/currency......a bill was passed in Germany that the gold should be audited and checked for density and completness and some was to be taken BACK to Germany for said tests...other countries are doing same

only BUG is........the gold that was supposed to be there......MAY NOT BE THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

now the "smart people" are saying

Doesnt matter if its there or not, as long as teh FED says its there


THINK ABOUT IT
 
The market is pricing in the Obama victory, and reacting to the Republican failure to take the Senate and what that may portend for the economy in the future.

Just as teh mkts COLLAPSED in June 2008, when Obama took the lead over ClitBitch and was assured an election win........
 
That figure is net, not gross. For the people who don't know what net and gross are, it means that the total number of millionaires under Obama has increased by 1,000 per day.

Only 1,000? That's probably an impeachable offense to some republicans.
 
That figure is net, not gross. For the people who don't know what net and gross are, it means that the total number of millionaires under Obama has increased by 1,000 per day.

and his total number of americans in poverty and on welfare and on foodstamps have also increased, by even larger margins i'd bet.

let's hope he's got a plan to address that, yeah? and by "plan", i don't mean campaign rhetoric.
 
and his total number of americans in poverty and on welfare and on foodstamps have also increased, by even larger margins i'd bet.

let's hope he's got a plan to address that, yeah? and by "plan", i don't mean campaign rhetoric.

From 2009-2011 (2012 isn't available yet):

- The number of millionaires increased 27.5%
- The number of people in poverty increased from 9.4%
- The number of people on food stamps increased 22.8%

(Note these are percentage changes, not raw percentages)

Since unemployment has declined from 8.7% to 7.9% in the past nine months, the percentage of Americans on food stamps will likely decline.


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nat...-americans-in-poverty-census-bureau-says.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3921164...number-americans-living-poverty/#.UJvI14aQOSo
 
From 2009-2011 (2012 isn't available yet):

- The number of millionaires increased 27.5%
- The number of people in poverty increased from 9.4%
- The number of people on food stamps increased 22.8%

(Note these are percentage changes, not raw percentages)

Since unemployment has declined from 8.7% to 7.9% in the past nine months, the percentage of Americans on food stamps will likely decline.


http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/nat...-americans-in-poverty-census-bureau-says.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3921164...number-americans-living-poverty/#.UJvI14aQOSo

and those are only percentages, and not gross numbers.

i'm sure i don't have to explain to you the difference between 1% of a thousand, and 1% of a million...

but yes, i'm glad the unemployment has gone down, and all that that implies. going into the holiday season, part-time hiring will help that also. i think the real test of economic recovery will come in january, which we won't know until feb or march i guess
 
and those are only percentages, and not gross numbers.

i'm sure i don't have to explain to you the difference between 1% of a thousand, and 1% of a million...

but yes, i'm glad the unemployment has gone down, and all that that implies. going into the holiday season, part-time hiring will help that also. i think the real test of economic recovery will come in january, which we won't know until feb or march i guess

Talking change in raw numbers rather than change in relative proportion is absurd.

The unemployment numbers are adjusted for the season so they will not decrease for Christmas hiring. Nor will they increase in January when the temporary retail jobs finish up.
 
and those are only percentages, and not gross numbers.

i'm sure i don't have to explain to you the difference between 1% of a thousand, and 1% of a million...

but yes, i'm glad the unemployment has gone down, and all that that implies. going into the holiday season, part-time hiring will help that also. i think the real test of economic recovery will come in january, which we won't know until feb or march i guess

You brought up "margins", and you were shown to be wrong. The correct thing to do in this instance would be to say "oh, my mistake, I was wrong".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top