"Did your son always have balls the size of cue balls?"

[Busybody]

IrezumiKiss
This message is hidden because IrezumiKiss is on your ignore list.


Kill yourself, NIGGER

 

[zipman]

And their patriotism as well as their respect and support for "The Office" will vanish the instant Ohio is called for Romney.

Just like their economic views will do a 180° and we will be losing the war on "Terrorism."

Our rights will vanish under the Patriot Act and outrages will be found at Gitmo as they scream about how religious intolerance from that fucking Mormon cultist is preventing fair trails for Muslims who are only asking one reasonable thing: to be tried according to Sharia...

You can bank on it.

LOL, you mean the kind of patriotism you and your buddies here are demonstrating. You're all giddy that American lives were lost so you could spin it as a partisan attack.

You're all a bunch of low lifes.

 

[Busybody]

LOL, you mean the kind of patriotism you and your buddies here are demonstrating. You're all giddy that American lives were lost so you could spin it as a partisan attack.

You're all a bunch of low lifes.

fucking asshole

you were CUMMING all over the place at BODY BAGS 2001-2008,

Another turbball that NEEDS DECAPITATION!

 

[miles]

Zip, that was really, really stupid. As in RDS stupid.

 

[zipman]

Zip, that was really, really stupid. As in RDS stupid.

No, your desire to use Benghazi for your partisan attacks is what is stupid.

 

[RobDownSouth]

No, your desire to use Benghazi for your partisan attacks is what is stupid.

They just "have some questions"....

Doesn't matter that these questions have been answered repeatedly, they seem to hope for a different answer.

But hey, you play the controversy cards you're dealt, not the cards you wish you were dealt.

 

[hummermania]

THE WEEKLY STANDARD understands that it will take some time to "gather all the facts" about what happened on the ground in Benghazi. But presumably the White House already has all the facts about what happened that afternoon and evening in Washington—or, at least, in the White House. The president was, it appears, in the White House from the time the attack on the consulate in Benghazi began, at around 2:40 pm ET, until the end of combat at the annex, sometime after 9 p.m. ET. So it should be possible to answer these simple questions as to what the president did that afternoon and evening, and when he did it, simply by consulting White House meeting and phone records, and asking the president for his recollections.

1.) To whom did the president give the first of his "three very clear directives"—that is, "make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to?"

2.) How did he transmit this directive to the military and other agencies?

3.) During the time when Americans were under attack, did the president convene a formal or informal meeting of his national security council? Did the president go to the situation room?

4.) During this time, with which members of the national security team did the president speak directly?

5.) Did Obama speak by phone or teleconference with the combatant commanders who would have sent assistance to the men under attack?

6.) Did he speak with CIA director David Petraeus?

7.) Was the president made aware of the repeated requests for assistance from the men under attack? When and by whom?

8.) Did he issue any directives in response to these requests?

9.) Did the president refuse to authorize an armed drone strike on the attackers?

10.) Did the president refuse to authorize a AC-130 or MC-130 to enter Libyan airspace during the attack?

Bill Kristol

Someone has been watching too many movies.

 

[Obama_2012]

It was terrorism on DAY 1!

Read the Rose Garden transcript! The words are right there!


Clarice Feldman, The American Thinker


Yet, we are still blaming the movie when the bodies come home.

I know. The father is lying.

On his son's grave.

No. You are blaming the movie. FOX is blaming the movie.
Vote Obama 2012!

 

[Obama_2012]

LOL, you mean the kind of patriotism you and your buddies here are demonstrating. You're all giddy that American lives were lost so you could spin it as a partisan attack.

You're all a bunch of low lifes.

They're desperate right now with the election looming.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[zipman]

Obama's campaign slogan: Are you going to believe the truth, or the lying right wing idiots?

I agree.

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Busybody]

http://cdn.pjmedia.com/instapundit/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/benghazi-monkeys.jpg

 

[unregistered]

 

[IrezumiKiss]

There wouldn't be enough animated Gifs in Zumi's entire repertoire to cover his level of ass gouging angst such a possibility would represent.

Oh, don't soak the couch, sweatshop...I have more than enough in stock to represent the apropos sentiment with each of your fails. And the best ones haven't even been used yet.

 

[unregistered]

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Fails? Me fail? Ahahahahaha...I live above ground bub. By tomorrow night your subterranean existence along with your graffiti collection, and Sasquatch footprint scrapbook, will be threatened big time.

Hate to bust your bubble on your boffo benightedness, beublah, but I reside in a place with a balcony that looks down on your time share with the forty-dollar high-maintenance lawns like a celestial from above. And if anybody's threatened about anything, all that'll be evidence on who's knocking their knobby knees will be your daily multiple desperation threads on Obama from here on up to the election.

And even AFTER that, too.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mcediqebwz1qa6g1m.gif

 

[Busybody]

The coverup

begins


McCain is saying the Obama administration has started the paperwork to classify Benghazi documents & video as "Top Secret".

 

[Busybody]

No, your desire to use Benghazi for your partisan attacks is what is stupid.

My suggestion for those who are confronted with charges of "politicizing" Benghazi?

I don't need to be lectured by the likes of you -- who made "Valerie Plame" a household term -- when a U.S. ambassador and three other personnel are dead, when the president lied for days about how they were killed, and when we can't find out why they were refused help, because the man ostensibly in charge refuses to take serious interviews and the White House Briefing Room has been closed for more than two weeks.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-LgODifzFSys/UI2hfgbnSBI/AAAAAAAA9Q8/zJPGJ7bOFSI/s1600/121028-benghazi-vs-plame.gif

 

[Busybody]

hey yo, Fore Ass

For YOU and only YOU!



Treating Islam with special reverence is cultural suicide and just plain wrong

167 Comments James Delingpole20 October 2012




My brilliant niece Freya was talking to my brother the other day about the religious education curriculum at her predominately white, middle-class state school in a pretty English cathedral city. She happened to mention ‘Mohammed, Peace Be Upon Him.’ ‘Eh?’ said my brother. ‘It’s what we’re taught at school. After we mention “Mohammed” we have to say “Peace be upon him”.’

Now I know what you’re thinking: that Freya must surely have got the wrong end of the stick. ‘If this were a madrassa in Bradford, well maybe,’ you’ll be thinking. ‘But at a white, middle-class state school in a pretty English cathedral city? No way. Things aren’t that bad. At least not yet, anyway…’

But Freya is not stupid. That’s why, at the beginning, I referred to her as my ‘brilliant’ niece as opposed to my ‘incredibly thick’ one. Apparently, she assures me, they’ve been taught to use the ‘peace be upon him’ formula since Year 7 and though they’re allowed to shorten it to PBUH, they’re definitely not supposed to call him just Mohammed. ‘There’s sometimes the odd snigger when the phrase comes up but we’ve been conditioned pretty much to accept it as normal,’ says Freya. ‘It’s a bit weird, given that there’s only two Muslim kids in my year of 100.’

I find this scary for at least two reasons. The first is what it says about the death of our national identity. When Freya’s father and I were at school, we had to go to ‘chapel’ once a day, and twice on Sundays. In our scripture classes we were taught all the key bible stories, even to the point of having to learn the names of all the apostles. It didn’t turn us into religious freaks — anything but. What it did instil in us, however, was a sense of history and tradition. Like generations before us we were members of the Anglican Church, familiar with the same tales, the same liturgy, the same hymns and psalms, the same rituals, the same boredom.

Before the 1980s, I suspect, this was the experience of most British children, regardless of their race or religious background. It wasn’t a question of forcing Christianity down anyone’s throat — merely an accepted part of the fabric of British life. You went to church (at least occasionally — Christmas at any rate) in the same way you watched Top of the Pops and Morecambe and Wise, or you had roast beef and Yorkshire pud for Sunday lunch. It just was what you did.

Not any more. Sure, the old religion is still covered in RE classes, but at state schools like Freya’s only as an equally valid and certainly by no means preferable alternative to Judaism, Sikhism, Islam and the rest. ‘Jesus was the son of God! Do you agree?’ asks a sample Key Stage 3 question from Freya’s school website. Well, what a bloody stupid question to ask an 11-year-old. How are they possibly going to be intellectually equipped to produce any kind of meaningful answer?




'Good news.'

A teacher at my old school, Malvern, told me that when new kids arrive he can no longer rely on their being familiar with even the most basic prayers and bible stories. No doubt the progressives who devised the new God-free curriculum will congratulate themselves on having finally freed young minds from the shackles of organised religion. (Probably they read somewhere that religion has caused more wars than, like, anything, man). But what they’ve really done is impoverished and deracinated and dumbed down a generation. They’ve denied Freya and her contemporaries the key that might one day have helped them unlock everything from ‘The Dream of the Rood’ to ‘The Whitsun Weddings’. They’ve vandalised 1,400 years of the history, literature and traditions which bound us as a nation.

But our failure to defend our culture is only the second scariest part of the PBUH story. The scariest, of course, is what it tells us not just about the growing dominance of Islamism but about our cowardice, fear and ignorance in so easily surrendering to it.

Mohammed, Peace Be Upon Him? I suppose it would make sense for a non-Muslim to use that phrase were he, say, trying to persuade his Islamist terrorist captors in Mali perhaps or the Yemen not to cut his head off. But since when did it become necessary for white, notionally C-of-E-ish English kids in a middle-class school in a pretty cathedral town?

I mean it’s bad enough — as I’ve argued — to teach kids to think that their country’s religious traditions no longer really matter. But what is surely unforgivable is simultaneously to teach those same kids that there is one particular religion which matters so much that even when you don’t subscribe to it you must still treat it with the reverence, fear and awe of those who do.

Why? You can imagine the fuss if at every mention of the name Jesus Christ all children of whatever creed were forced to raise their arms in the air and add ‘Our Lord and Saviour, He is risen, Alleluia’. We ought to be equally appalled, I would suggest, at what children at Freya’s school are being forced to do with regards to the prophet of a rival religion.

I want to get my beloved and brilliant niece out of there. She deserves better. What I’d really love is for her to enjoy the education I and her Dad had at our old school, Malvern. If any reader feels able to help her out, I’d love to hear from them.

 

[Bad_Doggie]

This thread defines; Hate, bitterness, and desperation.

Woof!

 

[Busybody]

This thread defines; Hate, bitterness, and desperation.

Woof!

mindless idiot

YOU INSULT DOGS WITH THAT SHIT COMMENT

SHAME ON YOU!