Candy

You could learn a lot about conservatives and liberals from looking at the reactions to the two debates. The lefties had no problem admitting that Obama didn't have a good night in Denver, but the wingnuts think Romney was just as good last night as he was two weeks ago. No concessions to reality, ever. It's a level of message discipline that I imagine is impossible to maintain unless you completely shut your brain off.

Ha!! Way to gloss over the 15 idiots that think Obama won that debate.


The only reason the results of this one are even a question is that Obama did so poorly the first time he had not were else to go but up.

"Well Obama did not get his ass kicked, so I guess that is a win"

I learned a lot form your post. Your are a idiot.
 
I heard Fox News a minute ago while I was driving, saying that an 8-person panel somewhere is proof that Romney won.

Meanwhile, CNN's poll which says it oversampled Republicans by 8 points says that Obama won by 7 points. This is the same oversampled poll method that conservatives were using to prove that Ryan beat Biden by a hair. How come you don't think these polls are valid anymore?

The 8-person panel was MSNBC's grab-bag of 8 purportedly "undecided" people. They came out in favor of Romney, so of course the RWCJ is crowing "Even MSNBC sez Romney won!"

What the margin of error on an sample size of 8? something like plus or minus 65%?
 
Ha!! Way to gloss over the 15 idiots that think Obama won that debate.


The only reason the results of this one are even a question is that Obama did so poorly the first time he had not were else to go but up.

"Well Obama did not get his ass kicked, so I guess that is a win"

I learned a lot form your post. Your are a idiot.


Weren't you one of the people making teleprompter jokes after the first debate? Maybe Romney could have used one, so that he wouldn't have had to be corrected by the moderator. :D

Oh, and I did enjoy this:



I learned a lot form your post. Your are a idiot.



Did you want to moron when you typed that?
 
You could learn a lot about conservatives and liberals from looking at the reactions to the two debates. The lefties had no problem admitting that Obama didn't have a good night in Denver, but the wingnuts think Romney was just as good last night as he was two weeks ago. No concessions to reality, ever. It's a level of message discipline that I imagine is impossible to maintain unless you completely shut your brain off.

Know how I know President Obama won?

New York Post front page after first debate:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-kDw9Tg1rBfQ/UH663XbHz2I/AAAAAAAAE7I/dLSqUz_uLgA/s400/front100412.jpg

New York Post front page after second debate:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-c7hQmfK_kko/UH67cuyKZqI/AAAAAAAAE7U/NY_1COwn_q8/s400/front101712.jpg
 


I wasn't watching, obviously, but I heard that the Fox people began blaming Crowley almost immediately.

I look forward to seeing them press these arguments simultaneously in the coming days: "Romney LUVVVVVVS women! Also, Candy Crowley is fat!"
 
Weren't you one of the people making teleprompter jokes after the first debate? Maybe Romney could have used one, so that he wouldn't have had to be corrected by the moderator. :D

Oh, and I did enjoy this:



I learned a lot form your post. Your are a idiot.



Did you want to moron when you typed that?

You do get that he was incorrectly corrected right?

That they went on the mornings shows and blamed the video?
That Obam went in front of the UN and mentioned the video 6 times?
That to say Obamas words meant he called it terrorism is disingenuous at best?

This has been cover ad nausea. I am sorry you are not capable of understanding it, or I am sad that you do and continue to lie.

But let's talk about typos from a iphone!:rolleyes:
 
You do get that he was incorrectly corrected right?

That they went on the mornings shows and blamed the video?
That Obam went in front of the UN and mentioned the video 6 times?
That to say Obamas words meant he called it terrorism is disingenuous at best?

This has been cover ad nausea. I am sorry you are not capable of understanding it, or I am sad that you do and continue to lie.

But let's talk about typos from a iphone!:rolleyes:

Ad nausea?
 
You do get that he was incorrectly corrected right?

That they went on the mornings shows and blamed the video?
That Obam went in front of the UN and mentioned the video 6 times?
That to say Obamas words meant he called it terrorism is disingenuous at best?

This has been cover ad nausea. I am sorry you are not capable of understanding it, or I am sad that you do and continue to lie.

But let's talk about typos from a iphone!:rolleyes:

That wasn't what Romney's statement was about. It was about his claim that Obama didn't refer to the attacks as a terrorist act for 14 days. The fact is he did so on Sept 12th and again on Sept 13th. Romney didn't do his homework and the audience laughed at him for it.
 
You do get that he was incorrectly corrected right?That they went on the mornings shows and blamed the video?That Obam went in front of the UN and mentioned the video 6 times?
That to say Obamas words meant he called it terrorism is disingenuous at best? This has been cover ad nausea. I am sorry you are not capable of understanding it, or I am sad that you do and continue to lie. But let's talk about typos from a iphone!:rolleyes:

"but...but...the Video!"
 
That wasn't what Romney's statement was about. It was about his claim that Obama didn't refer to the attacks as a terrorist act for 14 days. The fact is he did so on Sept 12th and again on Sept 13th. Romney didn't do his homework and the audience laughed at him for it.

Like Romney, VatAss wants a "Do-Over"....a DO-OVER, DAMMIT!
 
That wasn't what Romney's statement was about. It was about his claim that Obama didn't refer to the attacks as a terrorist act for 14 days. The fact is he did so on Sept 12th and again on Sept 13th. Romney didn't do his homework and the audience laughed at him for it.

Come on.....Kate already schooled you on this.

But maybe you will believe the fat cow:


After the debate, even Crowley seemed to acknowledge that she had erred. Romney was “right in the main” but “picked the wrong word,” she said on CNN.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82512.html#ixzz29Zx9rIDM

and what Obam actually said in no way refereed to it as terrorism.


“No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.


But keep up the spin!!!!:rolleyes:
 
Come on.....Kate already schooled you on this. But maybe you will believe the fat cow:
After the debate, even Crowley seemed to acknowledge that she had erred. Romney was “right in the main” but “picked the wrong word,” she said on CNN.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82512.html#ixzz29Zx9rIDM
and what Obam actually said in no way refereed to it as terrorism.
“No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.But keep up the spin!!!!:rolleyes:

but...but...Acts of Terrorism! *sob* ACTS OF TERRORISM, DAMMIT!
 
You do get that he was incorrectly corrected right?

That they went on the mornings shows and blamed the video?
That Obam went in front of the UN and mentioned the video 6 times?
That to say Obamas words meant he called it terrorism is disingenuous at best?

This has been cover ad nausea. I am sorry you are not capable of understanding it, or I am sad that you do and continue to lie.

But let's talk about typos from a iphone!:rolleyes:


That wasn't what Romney's statement was about. It was about his claim that Obama didn't refer to the attacks as a terrorist act for 14 days. The fact is he did so on Sept 12th and again on Sept 13th. Romney didn't do his homework and the audience laughed at him for it.


Yeah, this. Romney was audibly skeptical of Obama's statement that he had mentioned terrorism in his Rose Garden remarks. And Obama had, and Mitt got spanked for it. Whether or not he said the word terrorism or talked about the video in any other context is beside the point.
 
After the debate, even Crowley seemed to acknowledge that she had erred. Romney was “right in the main” but “picked the wrong word,” she said on CNN.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82512.html#ixzz29Zx9rIDM

and what Obam actually said in no way refereed to it as terrorism.


“No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.


But keep up the spin!!!!:rolleyes:


Your link says nothing of the sort. Candy didnt admit she erred at all.
 
~YAWN~

Candy Crowley, AKA BullWinkle, interrupted Romney 28 fucking times trying to come to the aid of your failed candidate. Obama looked weak. Yes he was better than last time but weak nonetheless. Romney was much more presidential and took Obama's economic policy apart like a clock without a single rebuttal by Obama.

You didn't watch this one either, did you?
 
~YAWN~

Candy Crowley, AKA BullWinkle, interrupted Romney 28 fucking times trying to come to the aid of your failed candidate. Obama looked weak. Yes he was better than last time but weak nonetheless. Romney was much more presidential and took Obama's economic policy apart like a clock without a single rebuttal by Obama.

Crowley interrupted Romney because he wasn't answering the questions. Tell me how not answering the questions looks presidential to you.

Romney went on about Fast & Furious in a segment that had nothing to do with F&F. He deserved to be interrupted.
 
WELL, YEAH, BUT WHO LISTENS TO JAY CARNEY? Jay Carney on 9/20: The White House “hadn’t” called Benghazi a “terrorist attack.”
 
CROWLEY BACKTRACKS ON HER BACKTRACK: As Romney advisor John Sununu said on CNN this morning, “It’s always good to come on the groupie channel.”

RELATED: Crowley On September 30th: Administration Took Weeks To Admit Benghazi Might Be A Terrorist Attack.
:cool:
 
Back
Top