How's this new turn in foriegn policy working out?

[VaticanAssassin]

The solution to islamic extremists is to bomb Iran?

You said something. Are you going to own it or not?

 

[Squibbs]

This was all caused by a you tube video..
Memo received

Don't believe the hype.

http://ts1.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=4560006168382412&id=f1f5c9a937d80f33796c3aad7f9ae5c7

 

[HAL_9000]

You said something. Are you going to own it or not?

I agree that murder and riots over a youtube video are idiotic.

However, is the solution to bomb Iran , or not?

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Don't believe the hype.

http://ts1.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=4560006168382412&id=f1f5c9a937d80f33796c3aad7f9ae5c7

I rarely do, unless you talking about my cock.

 

[HAL_9000]

Don't believe the hype.

http://ts1.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=4560006168382412&id=f1f5c9a937d80f33796c3aad7f9ae5c7

Then again, maybe it was all orchestrated, since the video in question has been around for over a year, and everything just "coincidentally" happened on Sept. 11th.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

I agree that murder and riots over a youtube video are idiotic.

However, is the solution to bomb Iran , or not?

Ahhhh ok. I will try this again...
Do you think this was all the result of a YouTube video?

 

[VaticanAssassin]

I agree that murder and riots over a youtube video are idiotic.

However, is the solution to bomb Iran , or not?

No.

Did someone suggest it was?

 

[HAL_9000]

Obama's main foreign policy difference seems to be exactly that.

 

[Busybody]

I agree that murder and riots over a youtube video are idiotic.

However, is the solution to bomb Iran , or not?

2 points

Its OK, you wont get any of it


1-Strong Horse Weak Horse

2-Better a rooster for a day, then a chicken for two


Now, go back to SENILITY

 

[HAL_9000]

Oh, yes, bombing them all back to the stone age will teach them a lesson.

I believe the correct term is "disproportionate reprisal" or even "collective punishment".

 

[Busybody]

I believe the correct term is "disproportionate reprisal" or even "collective punishment".

so what?


last time the US did that

In Japan

In

GERMANY

Surprise, WE WON


I assume you dont want to WIN wars,

You must be A PROG DUMOH

 

[unregistered]

 

[zipman]

Over whelming force to achieve unconditional surrender, used to be the American military doctrine.

Because that's going to work against terrorism.

That's like trying to fix a computer with a hammer.

Idiot.

 

[bra_man69]

Over whelming force to achieve unconditional surrender, used to be the American military doctrine.

WAS 60 years ago

 

[unregistered]

 

[zipman]

I didn't say it was the solution to the present problem did I, asswipe?

Then what problem are you suggesting it for dipshit?

 

[HAL_9000]

Hearts and minds, hearts and minds...

 

[Beco]

Obama's main foreign policy difference seems to be exactly that.

exactly what?

Fact is, if you look at White House trends, clearly, Obama is pulling out of the Middle East and moving toward Asia. Which, sort of makes sense....our future bread and butter is in Asia, not in the Middle East.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Over whelming force to achieve unconditional surrender, used to be the American military doctrine.

WAS 60 years ago

And it was effective as hell too.....to bad Merikuh went soft and "can't we just hold hand's with our enemies and sing the world song? Let's send our fighting forces through sensitivity training so our troops can kill with kindness!! that's great PC money spending!!!" and we have been getting our ass's kicked to this very day and continue to fail in the face of any real threat b/c of that sentiment.

Hearts and minds, hearts and minds...

^ yup...that's the liberal BUUULSHIT attitude of war.....

If you are not ready to annihilate your enemy, eliminate all threats with extreme prejudice and then seize all assets in order to pay for the war you have NO business starting one.

America is too soft and does not have the stomach for that.

 

[unregistered]

 

[bra_man69]

Hearts and minds, hearts and minds...

Stfu you haven't got clue what that means

 

[HAL_9000]

And it was effective as hell too.....to bad Merikuh went soft and "can't we just hold hand's with our enemies and sing the world song? Let's send our fighting forces through sensitivity training so our troops can kill with kindness!! that's great PC money spending!!!" and we have been getting our ass's kicked to this very day and continue to fail in the face of any real threat b/c of that sentiment.



^ yup...that's the liberal BUUULSHIT attitude of war.....

If you are not ready to annihilate your enemy, eliminate all threats with extreme prejudice and then seize all assets in order to pay for the war you have NO business starting one.

America is too soft and does not have the stomach for that.

As if. America is restrained by the Geneva Conventions and Laws of War.

Even with these "restraints" we manage to regularly kill innocent civvies.

So, unless you want to become a Nazi and start genocide, that's the way war works.

 

[mercury14]

Over whelming force to achieve unconditional surrender, used to be the American military doctrine.

And it was extremely effective. Until folks found out that it was somewhat neutralized by asymmetrical warfare. A Vietnam vet should have some awareness of this.

 

[mercury14]

If you are not ready to annihilate your enemy, eliminate all threats with extreme prejudice and then seize all assets in order to pay for the war you have NO business starting one.

America is too soft and does not have the stomach for that.

Again, neutralized by asymmetrical warfare

 

[HAL_9000]

Stfu you haven't got clue what that means

I know what it doesn't mean. It does not mean collective punishment. Or genocide.