Recidiva
Harastal
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Posts
- 89,726
I'd argue that if the point is that women were portrayed as stupid back in the day (a debatable point but one I'll cede since the other option would involve hours of watchin television that somehow sounds unappealing. Who'da thunk it. Hours of TV sounding like work?
I would say in a very real way guys have just gotten the script flipped on them for the last twenty years. I don't think that when I can go, Simpsons, King of the Hill, Married with Children, Unhappily Ever After, Family Guy and you already know who the common character is in all these shows that we can exactly claim that things are anywhere near an equilibrium of any sort. It's just it's our turn to be stupid and useless for quite a while. We still dominate action but we still dominate the military and sports too and baring some evolutionary change we're gonna dominate in that for another long stretch cus you simply have to be really good at a physical activity to overcome the size differences on average.
It doesn't help that guys are a bit pickier (and women don't as a whole seem to be much more forgiving regardless of what they claim) about what women can and can't star in a leading role as opposed to what guys can star in a leading role so I'd be willing to bet that the pool of male potential lead actors is simply deeper than female lead actors but that's just me guessing.
I object to the social perception that men are potentially anything less than awesome. Reality has wonderful men. And of course you guys here are great too.