I have been here for the elections of 2000, 2004, 2008...

4est_4est_Gump

Run Forrest! RUN!
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Posts
89,007
At no point has there ever been such a low passion as this one on the Democrat side.

There is no advocation of their President as there was for Algore, John Forbes Kerry, or the ascent of the Messiah. There is little defense of him. There is an attempt to attack Romney and his wife, but it always seems to backfire. Today's admiration at wardrobe is yesterday's condemnation of ostentation. Your grandfather's polygamy turned into polygamy of my father. Your dog on the car roof morphed into dog that I have ate. Your missing tax records are mirrored by transcripts and writings that are state secrets. Your love for a Wild West of unlimited guns is exceeded by my Mexican gun-running death counts. Your religious morality is transcended by my jack-boot morals over abortion. Your proclivity to settle things by leading invasion is trumped by my unending wars from the rear. Your excessive spending became my record deficits...

People, if you don't get excited about something other than Chic-fil-a, you're gonna lose this thing and it's going to catch you by surprise...
 
Why?



I get to come here daily as it is and bump your thread of gloat over the robust economy.

You can't have much more fun than that on Lit...
 
It matters not at all.

In 2008, only PinkStarfish was making threads about the many virtues of President Obama. Everyone else made their threads about the evils of President Bush.

I haven't seen PinkStarfish posting lately, but everyone in the "others" group of 2008 are now posting their threads about the potential, supposed and imagined evils of a nation under a President Romney.

But they will vote party line regardless of passion.
 
PS - kbate, memory does not serve you well.

In 2008, it was this:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=611105
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=614058
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=614066
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=614841

KILL PALIN!

All my love, all my kissin'
You don't know what you've been missin', oh boy,


It's palin to see,

OH! BOY!


(((LIPSTICK)))


[voice=Elvis][tone=THE KING!]
Misogyny trap. We can't hold back!
Because we hate you too much baybee...
[/voice]

Feelings, nothing more than feelings... [/tone]
 

Tomato Tomäto.

When your own candidate does not excite (in '08 worry about race and in '12 about the economy) you attack the other.

There is nothing any republican, libertarian, green or red could do that would take the RobdownSouth, Ulaven, Mercury14, and the rest of the loudcrowd's vote away from whichever democrat is running.

If Obama demanded a bloody purge of the wealthy, Mercury14 would post, "The Non-Partisan CBO shows that we can earn more from selling their stolen clothing than the bullets to kill them will cost."
 
*chuckle*

I'm not saying your wrong, but I wonder how many Bronzies are out there who said, I'm going to vote for him, because it's just rhetoric; once he's in the White House, the enormity of the responsibility will hit him, he will move to the center like Clinton, and he will unite us.

I wonder how many of them are as enthused at voting against Romney as they were Palin.

;) ;)
 
The common typo for "unite" is "untie"


I think we have found the actual typo now.
 
It matters not at all.

In 2008, only PinkStarfish was making threads about the many virtues of President Obama. Everyone else made their threads about the evils of President Bush.

I haven't seen PinkStarfish posting lately, but everyone in the "others" group of 2008 are now posting their threads about the potential, supposed and imagined evils of a nation under a President Romney.

But they will vote party line regardless of passion.

to be fair, the rest of the world was also hooked on the selling point that he wasn't a bush or palin or someone equally frickin' scary. we're reassured when the fingers on your button can construct full sentences with real words. beyond that, we don't give a shit what side wins.
 
to be fair, the rest of the world was also hooked on the selling point that he wasn't a bush or palin or someone equally frickin' scary. we're reassured when the fingers on your button can construct full sentences with real words. beyond that, we don't give a shit what side wins.

But Obama cannot.

When he's not reading a speech his grammatical errors, especially making subject and verb agree, are nearly of legendary proportion.

That and he actually thinks there is an Austrian language...
 
Wat notices the damnedest things.


Like, Comanchero brand has no tax stamps on the bottles.


Quick, where's ATF when they are needed . . . to do their actual jobs????

Maybe they can hop up the Hot Rod Lincoln and run some Mountain Dew across the border...

:cool:
 
But Obama cannot.

When he's not reading a speech his grammatical errors, especially making subject and verb agree, are nearly of legendary proportion.

That and he actually thinks there is an Austrian language...
yeah, but for one of your lot he's still doing well.

ours are mostly cunning, dishonest, sly bastards.
yours are often retarded puppets.

i'm not sure which is worse actually...
 
Or steal Doyle's trucks.


And Doyle's gasoline.


And Doyle's girl.


Mmmmm, Injun poontang . . . .
 
yeah, but for one of your lot he's still doing well.

ours are mostly cunning, dishonest, sly bastards.
yours are often retarded puppets.

i'm not sure which is worse actually...


I'd say, flip a coin.


Heads they win, tails we lose.
 
yeah, but for one of your lot he's still doing well.

ours are mostly cunning, dishonest, sly bastards.
yours are often retarded puppets.

i'm not sure which is worse actually...

Good thing you're hawt...


;) ;)
 
Back
Top