lazyhobo
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Posts
- 570
I've read several stories and I'm constantly hitting a problem. When describing a woman's breasts, mainly regarding their size, people and authors seem to think that a simple "and she had 34D breasts" is enough information. To be honest, to a man like me with no knowledge of Bra's and their sizes, giving me a bra measurement and a breast size are two completely different things.
I had one story, where even though the breasts were described and included throughout all 7 lit pages, I only actually found out their size around the end of the 5th page, where he described them as "good in size, not really too large, not tiny but enough to fill a general palm" now its not the best description, but I did get the point about how large they really were. The cup size I was given at the start, did not tell me at all how large they really were.
Now, What are your opinions regarding bra sizes as a way of effectively describing the size of a woman's breasts? and if you think, like myself, that this is a bad way of describing them, should we as Editors mention this to any Authors that simply put a cup size?
I had one story, where even though the breasts were described and included throughout all 7 lit pages, I only actually found out their size around the end of the 5th page, where he described them as "good in size, not really too large, not tiny but enough to fill a general palm" now its not the best description, but I did get the point about how large they really were. The cup size I was given at the start, did not tell me at all how large they really were.
Now, What are your opinions regarding bra sizes as a way of effectively describing the size of a woman's breasts? and if you think, like myself, that this is a bad way of describing them, should we as Editors mention this to any Authors that simply put a cup size?