Kitty Play

Kinky_Sprite

Really Really Experienced
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Posts
359
Does anybody do kitty play? or identify as a kitty "pet"

I kind of identify as a kitty-girl princess:

To me this involves some age play (range 19-24), some pet play, a mix of spoiled girly-girlishness, d/s play w/ a daddy... submissive BUT well, cats aren't really submissive and they aren't really tame but sometimes they like to cuddle and sometimes they like to roam.

I don't know if there is a shorter way to express this...

Thoughts?
 
Does anybody do kitty play? or identify as a kitty "pet"

I kind of identify as a kitty-girl princess:

To me this involves some age play (range 19-24), some pet play, a mix of spoiled girly-girlishness, d/s play w/ a daddy... submissive BUT well, cats aren't really submissive and they aren't really tame but sometimes they like to cuddle and sometimes they like to roam.

I don't know if there is a shorter way to express this...

Thoughts?
I have long suspected that adult females who ID as princesses really want to control the proceedings, whether they admit it or not.

I have long suspected the same thing about females who ID as cats.

If you're gonna double down with the cat princess thing, why not just ID as a D-type who likes role play and costumes? Seems like a more straightforward presentation. ;)
 
I have long suspected that adult females who ID as princesses really want to control the proceedings, whether they admit it or not.

I have long suspected the same thing about females who ID as cats.

If you're gonna double down with the cat princess thing, why not just ID as a D-type who likes role play and costumes? Seems like a more straightforward presentation. ;)
I agree-- and I think "Kitty" is a very concise indicator for the type...
 
I have long suspected that adult females who ID as princesses really want to control the proceedings, whether they admit it or not.

I have long suspected the same thing about females who ID as cats.

If you're gonna double down with the cat princess thing, why not just ID as a D-type who likes role play and costumes? Seems like a more straightforward presentation. ;)

Well because it's a different dynamic.
 
I ID as switch. I adore Dominant or very "manly" men, even a guy who wants to be topped better have a manly side to him.

Being Dominant all the time is tiring, I want pets, care, and a touch of discipline.

If you've ever owned (actual) cats, especially female cats, one second you're scratching their back, they're purring and nudging and the next second they'll bite you. That's me ;)
 
Last edited:
I ID as switch. I adore Dominant or very "manly" men, even a guy who wants to be topped better have a manly side to him.

Being Dominant all the time is tiring, I want pets, care, and a touch of discipline.

If you've ever owned (actual) cats, especially female cats, one second you're scratching their back, they're purring and nudging and the next second they'll bite you. That's me ;)

You nailed it!!! Thanks Loverskitten:):cattail:
 
I ID as switch. I adore Dominant or very "manly" men, even a guy who wants to be topped better have a manly side to him.

Being Dominant all the time is tiring, I want pets, care, and a touch of discipline.

If you've ever owned (actual) cats, especially female cats, one second you're scratching their back, they're purring and nudging and the next second they'll bite you. That's me ;)
Can't say that I've ever owned cats, no.

Nothing you describe as cat behavior sounds obedient or deferential to me. That doesn't mean it's bad, it just means I don't recognize that behavior as a good fit for the flip side to a D.

You want to be petted, cared for, tended to... when you're in the mood for such things. I get that. I want to sucked, fed, amused... when I'm in the mood for it.

See what I mean?
 
Relevant side note:
Before I identified as a kittycat, a guy I dated a long time ago started calling me "kitten" I adored that. Looking back on Halloweens past, I was a cat about 1/2 the years of my life. There has also never been a time I didn't have a pet cat, my Dad loved black cats and I did/do too. I've received countless comments about how a particular trait of mine is "catlike"
So I suppose I was into kittenplay before I even knew it. :catroar:
 
No, a "dog person" would thrive as the deferential and obedient partner in a relationship.

That's not me.

*sigh*
I was just making a joke referencing the whole cat person/dog person (as actual owners of animals) debate.



Don't tell me you're one of those "animal haters"
*shudder*
 
Relevant side note:
Before I identified as a kittycat, a guy I dated a long time ago started calling me "kitten" I adored that. Looking back on Halloweens past, I was a cat about 1/2 the years of my life. There has also never been a time I didn't have a pet cat, my Dad loved black cats and I did/do too. I've received countless comments about how a particular trait of mine is "catlike"
So I suppose I was into kittenplay before I even knew it. :catroar:

I'm with JM on this one. I see very little in cat behavior that is reminiscent of the kinds of traits that we associate with submissives. They do not obey commands, they show no overt interest in pleasing their owners, and they make lousy coffee.
 
I'm with JM on this one. I see very little in cat behavior that is reminiscent of the kinds of traits that we associate with submissives. They do not obey commands, they show no overt interest in pleasing their owners, and they make lousy coffee.

HAHAHA that made coffee come out my nose.
 
yep-- Kitties should be considered a dominant role. It's funny how few of them think they are!

Must be that heteronormative thing.
 
yep-- Kitties should be considered a dominant role. It's funny how few of them think they are!

Must be that heteronormative thing.
Sometimes I wonder if hetero women worry that they'll be less attractive to males if they admit to D wiring. Which seems absurd on the face of it, given the number of s-type males.

But then I start wondering if the problem is that they've been socialized to find s-type males unappealing, so they flip things around in their heads, pretending that the guy doing the petting and the tending and the putting up with the moody scratching, etc., is somehow the one in charge.
 
Sometimes I wonder if hetero women worry that they'll be less attractive to males if they admit to D wiring. Which seems absurd on the face of it, given the number of s-type males.

But then I start wondering if the problem is that they've been socialized to find s-type males unappealing, so they flip things around in their heads, pretending that the guy doing the petting and the tending and the putting up with the moody scratching, etc., is somehow the one in charge.

I think both of those things are a huge part of the issue. Very well put, JM:rose:

There's something rolling around my head about an egalitarian version of power exchange, but it's not making sense yet.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top