Liar
now with 17% more class
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Posts
- 43,715
If Joe has irrefutable evidence, he has a case.
If he has a case, he should take it to a prosecutor, not hold a public press conference and vent the evidence for public spin and media FUD.
So, he either has (or believes he has) evidence and is an incompetent law enforcer for holding a vanity event about it. Or he has nada and knows it.
If there's an option C, lemme know.
If he has a case, he should take it to a prosecutor, not hold a public press conference and vent the evidence for public spin and media FUD.
So, he either has (or believes he has) evidence and is an incompetent law enforcer for holding a vanity event about it. Or he has nada and knows it.
If there's an option C, lemme know.
Last edited:

