The multiple felonies of Barack Obama

coachdb18

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Posts
9,366
The Obama campaign should NEVER in a sane world have even thought to broach the subject of felonies; not with Fast and Furious Eric Holder guilty of obstruction of justice and accessory to murder; not with Holder suing states to continue state sponsored racism and hate crimes against Texas, Arizona, Florida, South Carolina, (and the other 53 states as well); Tony Rezko and the felonious land deals he's involved himself in; Bill Ayres, and the killing of cops and bombing of the Pentagon; and his treason for attempts to and advocacy of the revocation of the Constitution by Executive Order.

Surely a history of his personal felony sponsorship and treasonous involvements is NOT something Obama should want to point to, EVER!
 
Wow, you managed almost every sinlge herp-derp moronic "conservative" talking point in a single post. Bravo!

You forgot to say that he's not really an American citizen though. -10 points.

:rolleyes:
 
Wow, you managed almost every sinlge herp-derp moronic "conservative" talking point in a single post. Bravo!

You forgot to say that he's not really an American citizen though. -10 points.

:rolleyes:

Nope, I covered that one too, but there are pages and pages and pages of crimes he's committed... that makes Nuremburg look like a Sunday picnic!
....and his treason for attempts to and advocacy of the revocation of the Constitution by Executive Order...
 
Nope, I covered that one too, but there are pages and pages and pages of crimes he's committed... that makes Nuremburg look like a Sunday picnic!

No there isn't. Every US president to date combined doesn't add up to your accusation. Now shut the fuck up.
 
The Obama campaign should NEVER in a sane world have even thought to broach the subject of felonies; not with Fast and Furious Eric Holder guilty of obstruction of justice and accessory to murder; not with Holder suing states to continue state sponsored racism and hate crimes against Texas, Arizona, Florida, South Carolina, (and the other 53 states as well); Tony Rezko and the felonious land deals he's involved himself in; Bill Ayres, and the killing of cops and bombing of the Pentagon; and his treason for attempts to and advocacy of the revocation of the Constitution by Executive Order.

Surely a history of his personal felony sponsorship and treasonous involvements is NOT something Obama should want to point to, EVER!

You're not even trying to maintain contact with reality any more, are you?
 
Why is it 'right' for Hillary Clinton to call on the UN and the world to push for the ouster of Assad in Syria for 'killing his own people', while not making the same plea over the crimes of Eric Holder, who has done and continues to do the very same thing, with Obama's blessings?
 
Why is it 'right' for Hillary Clinton to call on the UN and the world to push for the ouster of Assad in Syria for 'killing his own people', while not making the same plea over the crimes of Eric Holder, who has done and continues to do the very same thing, with Obama's blessings?

So much for maintaining any semblance of rationality eh Coach? :rolleyes:
 
Why is it 'right' for Hillary Clinton to call on the UN and the world to push for the ouster of Assad in Syria for 'killing his own people', while not making the same plea over the crimes of Eric Holder, who has done and continues to do the very same thing, with Obama's blessings?

Hillary is busy this month at the UN gun control conference. Give her a break.
 
Hillary is busy this month at the UN gun control conference. Give her a break.

Maybe while she's at the UN gun conference, she can explain how the .22 pistol in Vince Foster's hand put a .38 caliber bullet in his head in the 'suicide' she committed, and how his Rose Law Firm papers implicating her in felony activity mysteriously then came to be found in the White House residence....
 
Nope, I covered that one too, but there are pages and pages and pages of crimes he's committed... that makes Nuremburg look like a Sunday picnic!

I've said this before but this time I really really mean it...That is the STUPIDEST thing I've ever heard anyone say at Literotica.

And there used to be a girl here who tried to convince us that fucking dogs was okay.
 
I've said this before but this time I really really mean it...That is the STUPIDEST thing I've ever heard anyone say at Literotica.

And there used to be a girl here who tried to convince us that fucking dogs was okay.

Treason is the highest of crimes, because it is not simply the murder of an individual (bad enough), but involves the intentional killing of citizens and their very system of government. The criminals of Nuremberg were convicted of crimes against humanity, which is at the very least on par with the deaths at the hands of Obama via drug cartel support, not just the ones directly killed by gun running support.
 
Treason is the highest of crimes, because it is not simply the murder of an individual (bad enough), but involves the intentional killing of citizens and their very system of government. The criminals of Nuremberg were convicted of crimes against humanity, which is at the very least on par with the deaths at the hands of Obama via drug cartel support, not just the ones directly killed by gun running support.

For God's sake someone explain to him what treason is.
 
Treason is the highest of crimes, because it is not simply the murder of an individual (bad enough), but involves the intentional killing of citizens and their very system of government. The criminals of Nuremberg were convicted of crimes against humanity, which is at the very least on par with the deaths at the hands of Obama via drug cartel support, not just the ones directly killed by gun running support.

this is an interesting argument.

how, exactly, do you equate the two?
 
For God's sake someone explain to him what treason is.

Obama has committed treason on multiple counts, not the least of which is to disband Congress and subvert the Constitution for his own agenda. He has pledged not to uphold the laws passed by the Congress, and to interject 'laws' of his own creation in the place of legislative action.

Yes, Treason.
 
this is an interesting argument.

how, exactly, do you equate the two?

The legal argument is complex but it is based on the following:

A = Obama Bad (given)
B = Treason Bad (given)

Bad = Bad = A =B = Obama Treason.
 
Obama has committed treason on multiple counts, not the least of which is to disband Congress and subvert the Constitution for his own agenda. He has pledged not to uphold the laws passed by the Congress, and to interject 'laws' of his own creation in the place of legislative action.

Yes, Treason.

Please post a photo. I just have to see if this kind of crazy is visible in the eyes.
 
Are you fucking kidding me?

hell no, i'm not kidding.

i want to see how he makes the argument that fast and furious equates to the nazi atrocities in WWII, and i want to see how he likens obama's culpability to goring's.
 
For the umpteenth time: in the minds of Obama's Lemmings there is absolutely nothing he could ever do wrong.

Fast and Furious? It doesn't exist!

Solyndra? China's fault!

The economy? Bush's fault!

Obama's blatant lies? All politicians lie!

Unemployment? See the economy.

If The Fraud dropped trou during a press conference, you people would say it never happened.
 
hell no, i'm not kidding.

i want to see how he makes the argument that fast and furious equates to the nazi atrocities in WWII, and i want to see how he likens obama's culpability to goring's.

Fuck yeah, this should be interesting.

Woof!
 
Actually treason is defined in the Constitution:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."

Obama's dereliction of duty, malfeasance, or whatever you want to call it, doesn't meet the constitutional definition of treason.

The closest he came to even the realm of treason might have been his suggestion to the Russian government that he might be able to accomplish arms reductions after the election. The implication being such a deal would not be seen by Americans as being in their interests, enough so as to prevent or hamper his re-election.

Russia is perceived by many to be an enemy and the President's job is not to further their interests at the expense of our own. Even that action would be a stretch of the definition.

If Benedict Arnold met the definition of treason for giving up West Point to the British, then Obama has certainly done as much by giving up our border in total to illegal immigration, and supporting illegal santuary cities, jobs, and has gone so far as to sue those who object to the refusal to support our sovereignty. He's also guilty of providing national secrets, most if not all of which place the interests of the nation, and the very lives of citizens in jeopardy. He's also given up those agents of the US to foreign enemies, especially Iran.

It's treason.
 
Back
Top