RedHairedandFriendly
Too much red on Red?
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2005
- Posts
- 112,724
Years ago I would not have wanted to read a book like that, but my taste has changed - for the better I think.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have always been told anything over 50K is a novel. I don't mean just from my time here on Lit. but I mean from my creative writing class that I took two-three years ago as well as while I was in school - 20 years ago (so sad). I guess it depends on the person hearing the numbers and the person giving the numbers.
It strikes me as odd that the designations of longer works are applied to shorter works in the e-book world, particularly considering that relative to print publishing the costs of publishing an e-book are negligible.
Lovecraft's At the Mountains of Madness is 110 pages in the paperback I have. But I bet the word count is ridiculous, there is virtually no dialogue in it, its all narrative so every page is just blocks of text.
Again pages don't equate to wordage very well at all. You can manipulate words-per-page by changing the font, the font size, the leading (the space between words), the spacing between lines, the margins, the amount of drop in chapter titles, whether you continue a chapter opener on the next page or the next verso page . . .
My observation is that e-book publishers are pretty much ignoring the widow and orphan issues--and buyers/readers aren't hyperventilating over that.
For e-books I'm sure. I'm formatting that myself. I'm speaking of a POD edition where that would matter.
So was I.
So you're saying that in your experience, when people are reading they don;t care if a sentence starts on one page and finishes on another and all that sloppy crap?
Not erotica, no, apparently not. I don't see any erotica publishers bothering with it, nor any erotica book readers complaining about it.