Well Now The Cat Is Out Of The Bag, Again.

LMAO at anyone who calls himself a conservative and plans to vote for Willard Romney.
 
i'd say the bias goes well beyond msm when you consider internet 'news' outlets such as slate.com and salon.com. hell even the headlines on yahoo's homepage are skewed in favor of obama, and against conservatives much of the time
 
i'd say the bias goes well beyond msm when you consider internet 'news' outlets such as slate.com and salon.com. hell even the headlines on yahoo's homepage are skewed in favor of obama, and against conservatives much of the time

Yeah, earlier today, the Yahoo page said something like "Most Controversial Portion of Arizona Immigration Law Upheld", but they later changed it to "75% of Arizona Law Overturned". They must have realised their mistake.
 
LMAO at anyone who calls himself a conservative and plans to vote for Willard Romney.

That's a bit of a segue. Are you jabbing at Vette or just erecting a snap-post bumper sticker?

The Media Bias thing is far more interesting than Vette. It's a conservative standard. The NBC guy's worth a read as oral history. BTW, there will be a number of people who vote for Willard Romney who have never called themselves conservative.

If yours is just about Vette, then...
 
For fifty years there was no free market in the MSM, you could turn the channel and hear the same liberal bias on all three major networks. Liberals love to brainwash the masses with their misguided bullshit.:D

The market fixes everything, doesn't it? How come the media is overwhelmingly liberal, is the market not working?
 
The video editing thing really is a bitch move. People should be fired for that every single time they get caught. Zero tolerance.
 
There'd be no-one left at Breitbart.

It only takes one person on top to insist on just the most basic ethics. Editing video like they have is exactly the same as printing a story you know is false. If someone did that in a newspaper they'd be gone the instant it was discovered and they'd likely never work again. The fact that this doesn't happen just shows that the people on top have no ethics.
 
I understand this case is unfair and those responsible should be fired. However, almost everything on the news is 'edited for content'! This has been so from the first newspaper.

Fox news has many times given half truths or flat out lies. There is no honest journalist just as there are NO honest politicians.
 
I understand this case is unfair and those responsible should be fired. However, almost everything on the news is 'edited for content'! This has been so from the first newspaper.

Fox news has many times given half truths or flat out lies. There is no honest journalist just as there are NO honest politicians.

Editing to fabricate has never been acceptable. It is among the worst things a journalist can do.
And yes there are honest journalists. Always have been.
 
It only takes one person on top to insist on just the most basic ethics. Editing video like they have is exactly the same as printing a story you know is false. If someone did that in a newspaper they'd be gone the instant it was discovered and they'd likely never work again. The fact that this doesn't happen just shows that the people on top have no ethics.

Unless you work for News International, obviously. Rupert would promote you.
 
An honest question:

Is it enough to ask the question, Vette? Whatever question the question might be? As you can see, nearly anything you post is quickly occluded by how certain people perceive you - by byline. Are you magnanimous enough to continue to take the punches as people either finally discuss your OP or just dis-cuss you? Is that enough? Wow...
 
Back
Top