Should a woman who has had bilateral, radical mastectomies...

[Bert Notorius]

...be able to swim topless in a public pool?

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/120621-cancer-swimmer-hmed340p%20copy.380;380;7;70.jpg

 

[koalabear]

Sure, even if they haven't had them.

 

[Frizzle_Fry]

Sure, even if they haven't had them.

+1 boobies should allowed to be set free at their owners discretion...

 

[December]

I believe it's legal for women to go topless in the province I live in. Not that you ever actually see anyone taking advantage. Be nice if you did, but I imagine topless girlies everywhere in public would cause a lot of car accidents, among other things.

I think she should be allowed to go topless if every other woman is also allowed to go topless. If every other woman is not allowed where she lives, then no, she shouldn't be allowed to either.

 

[run_silent]

I heard about this on the radio. How can you be banned for showing your boobs if you don't have any. Geez, I wish I had this much time on my hands to be offended by a non issue.

BTW, I'm reporting you for posting nudity on the board. Er, non nudity, um, well just offending me because I'm a petite flower.

You cocksucker!

 

[Noor]

all women should be able to swim topless or even nude!

I used to swim in a t-shirt and my underwear in Maritimes when I was younger.
Usually in the evening, attracted a lot of Portuguese speaking boys, but someone from my family was always watching me swim.

For a while I would just strip and swim anytime there was water for me to swim in, but I was persuaded that it would be more socially acceptable if I took off my watch and my shoes then swim in my clothes, although if my family was there I would strip down further.

I was a serious water baby, I love the water!

 

[TexasWife25]

I believe it's legal for women to go topless in the province I live in. Not that you ever actually see anyone taking advantage. Be nice if you did, but I imagine topless girlies everywhere in public would cause a lot of car accidents, among other things.

I think she should be allowed to go topless if every other woman is also allowed to go topless. If every other woman is not allowed where she lives, then no, she shouldn't be allowed to either.

I agree with this completely.

She is still a woman, I doubt the law says anything about breast size. If its legal yes, if it's not, no.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Locally all the titless old ladies made a pinup calendar, topless. I have no idea who bought the calendars or wants to see an 80 year old with no boobs.

 

[dolf]

if it was about tits, obese dudes would have to wear bikinis.
it's not about tits. it's about our evil eve temptations to innocent men.

 

[dagdag]

Let her decide.

 

[koalabear]

Locally all the titless old ladies made a pinup calendar, topless. I have no idea who bought the calendars or wants to see an 80 year old with no boobs.

You live in Winchester!

 

[atmas]

Radical mastectomies are exceedingly rare these days, and bilateral is even more rare. Statisticaly fewer than 5% of mastectomies are radical.

So this case is like the guy with the 100 pound testicles. A bit of a carnival act.

 

[dolf]

for women with the cancer gene, the decision to remove is not unheard of. i think if i'd watched my mother, aunts, grandmother die of cancer i'd opt to life sans tits.

 

[oggbashan]

Any woman should be able to swim topless in a public pool without attracting criticism, even if she is closer to a whale than a dolphin.

As for the picture in the OP, I think she's still all woman and a brave one.

 

[Bert Notorius]

What goes on the bottom? Bikini bottom or trunks?

 

[Disgustipated]

What goes on the bottom? Bikini bottom or trunks?

^^^ further proving Bert is confused about the female anatomy.

 

[busybody..]

FUCK THIS CUNT~!


NEVER FUCKING HAPPY

SHOOT HER

Woman With Mastectomy Wins Right to Swim Topless



Jodi Jaecks wants to swim topless because she says her chest is sensitive. So Seattle granted her the right to swim topless. But that’s not enough for Jodi, she wants everyone that claims to have a sensitive chest to be able to swim topless.

Then it will be flat-chested women that look like men anyway. Then it will be giant-tittied women who chaff. Then it will be women. That’s the way the left rolls – they get the camel’s tit into the tent by hiding behind victims, crisis and children. It’s their Holy Trinity.

CBS-

A Seattle breast cancer survivor whose breasts were surgically removed has gained the permission to swim topless at a city pool.

But Jodi Jaecks wants to make sure her privilege is also extended to other breast cancer survivors who want to swim comfortably.

“Initially when I heard about the reversal, I was elated. Then it came that it wasn’t a policy change, it was just an exception for me. Then I was quite deflated. It seemed like it was a reaction that it was just meant to appease me,” the 47-year-old said Thursday.

Seattle Parks and Recreation Superintendent Christopher Williams announced Wednesday that he was giving Jaecks an exception to the department’s clothing policy.

“Our original concern stems from our responsibility to accommodate the needs of all our patrons. In this case, I see nothing that might alarm the public,” Williams said in a statement. He was reacting to an article about Jaecks that was published in The Stranger weekly newspaper, which also ran a picture of her topless.

Parks spokeswoman Dewey Potter said Thursday that Williams has decided to create a committee made up of cancer survivors, parks staff, King County health representatives and others to come up with a new policy.

 

[busybody..]

I want the right to pelt liberals with rotting produce as I have IED-Intermittant Explosive Disorder and it will help calm me down rather than having a violent outburst.

 

[busybody..]

Jodi Jackoff just wants attention. She’s the sandra Fluke type. Let her swim in the leper pool

 

[renard_ruse]

...be able to swim topless in a public pool?

If you think this is a real case and not a deliberate setup from the ultra lunatic fringe that claim male and female busts are the same body parts, you are indeed a fool. This person is a "test case" in order to bring an eventual lawsuit and have the courts decree that there is no difference between the male and female chests in all cases not just this one unusual situation. Its another phony set up by an activist lobby.

For whatever reason, there is a lunatic fringe beyond the regular luntatic femanist fringe that has decided to claim that male pectorals and female breasts are the same organs. I'm no longer going to use the word male "breasts" because that's not what they are. I think that is part of the confusion. Men have pectorals, women have breasts. They are not the same body parts.

Although I didn't read the details of this individual case, if this was really a sincere case the individual involved didn't need to bring in the national media over it. Both sides could have compromised and handled it more discretely. Its a setup by fringe activists to get a New York style lunatic ruling handed down by the national courts.

 

[Bert Notorius]

If you think this is a real case and not a deliberate setup from the ultra lunatic fringe that claim male and female busts are the same body parts, you are indeed a fool. This person is a "test case" in order to bring an eventual lawsuit and have the courts decree that there is no difference between the male and female chests in all cases not just this one unusual situation. Its another phony set up by an activist lobby.

For whatever reason, there is a lunatic fringe beyond the regular luntatic femanist fringe that has decided to claim that male pectorals and female breasts are the same organs. I'm no longer going to use the word male "breasts" because that's not what they are. I think that is part of the confusion. Men have pectorals, women have breasts. They are not the same body parts.

Although I didn't read the details of this individual case, if this was really a sincere case the individual involved didn't need to bring in the national media over it. Both sides could have compromised and handled it more discretely. Its a setup by fringe activists to get a New York style lunatic ruling handed down by the national courts.

Look, you calling me a fool. I'd like to see that stand up in a court of law.

 

[badbabysitter]

If you think this is a real case and not a deliberate setup from the ultra lunatic fringe that claim male and female busts are the same body parts, you are indeed a fool. This person is a "test case" in order to bring an eventual lawsuit and have the courts decree that there is no difference between the male and female chests in all cases not just this one unusual situation. Its another phony set up by an activist lobby.

For whatever reason, there is a lunatic fringe beyond the regular luntatic femanist fringe that has decided to claim that male pectorals and female breasts are the same organs. I'm no longer going to use the word male "breasts" because that's not what they are. I think that is part of the confusion. Men have pectorals, women have breasts. They are not the same body parts.

Although I didn't read the details of this individual case, if this was really a sincere case the individual involved didn't need to bring in the national media over it. Both sides could have compromised and handled it more discretely. Its a setup by fringe activists to get a New York style lunatic ruling handed down by the national courts.

this again?


http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=781773

 

[Frizzle_Fry]

If you think this is a real case and not a deliberate setup from the ultra lunatic fringe that claim male and female busts are the same body parts, you are indeed a fool. This person is a "test case" in order to bring an eventual lawsuit and have the courts decree that there is no difference between the male and female chests in all cases not just this one unusual situation. Its another phony set up by an activist lobby.

For whatever reason, there is a lunatic fringe beyond the regular luntatic femanist fringe that has decided to claim that male pectorals and female breasts are the same organs. I'm no longer going to use the word male "breasts" because that's not what they are. I think that is part of the confusion. Men have pectorals, women have breasts. They are not the same body parts.

Although I didn't read the details of this individual case, if this was really a sincere case the individual involved didn't need to bring in the national media over it. Both sides could have compromised and handled it more discretely. Its a setup by fringe activists to get a New York style lunatic ruling handed down by the national courts.

You are a fucking retard in dire need of an A&P class.