A liberal world

Well coach, there are many people who don't know how to think regardless of party. Plenty of libs think the GOP is a party of lemmings. One's opinions aren't necessarily fact, again regardless of party.

I just think I'd have a much better chance of finding cluster-loving lemmings banging drums together, knitting themselves tightly into inner cities as urban concentrates, than in a disparate grouping of those who regard 'personal responsibility' highly and think the neighbors are getting too close when they can see their campfires at night
 
Working up to your capacity is never a bad thing!

OK. How about, instead of just tossing out demeaning language, you actually listen to what people have to say? This message is directed to both sides.

To be honest, sir, you are mistaking SOCIAL thought for PRACTICAL thought. When dealing with social thought, we are talking about how we deal with human beings. With practical thought, we are talking about we deal with science. Scientifically, Liberals tend to be much more open-minded about things, more willing to share them, and less bound to rigged ideologies (To get a basic understanding of this, see most medical scientific advances currently on hold. Some are held back by liberals, other conservatives, but the former point to the PRACTICAL aspects of the device ie. does it actually make people healthier and safer, without drawbacks that over-play the benefits, while the later is on more IDEOLOGICAL aspects ie. We can't do stem cell research because God dosen't like the idea.

Also, conservatives aren't very fond of change. Indeed, history is littered with the great inventions of the fast-thinking liberal, whereas conservatives have fought scientific advancement from square one. Of course, maybe the wheel would have ended up square, but a square wheel is better then having no wheel at all (My great-great-great-great grandpa used his feet and arms... why shoulden't I?) That's why we should be thankful that liberals and conservatives build the world together.
 
I just think I'd have a much better chance of finding cluster-loving lemmings banging drums together, knitting themselves tightly into inner cities as urban concentrates, than in a disparate grouping of those who regard 'personal responsibility' highly and think the neighbors are getting too close when they can see their campfires at night

Oh. You value barbarians over civilians. that actually explains quite a bit. Thank you.
 
I just think I'd have a much better chance of finding cluster-loving lemmings banging drums together, knitting themselves tightly into inner cities as urban concentrates, than in a disparate grouping of those who regard 'personal responsibility' highly and think the neighbors are getting too close when they can see their campfires at night

What are the sorts of things you do to shoulder personal responsibility?
 
I just think I'd have a much better chance of finding cluster-loving lemmings banging drums together, knitting themselves tightly into inner cities as urban concentrates, than in a disparate grouping of those who regard 'personal responsibility' highly and think the neighbors are getting too close when they can see their campfires at night


Because the former where marginalled due to their inefficent system a long time ago?

And, conservatives can be major lemmings too. Ever been to a church, gun club, or a corporate board room? The difference is liberals tend to form "group clusters" where the group's opinion is decided together, whereas conservatives tend to form "gang clusters", where the group opinion is formed by whomever manages to grab power.
 
What are the sorts of things you do to shoulder personal responsibility?

Are you more interested in setting up straw men to denigrate my career as a military officer, or as a Quality Manager in the Medical Device industry post military... it's important to know whether one should wear a bullet proof vest or a bring antivenom... or were you wanting to find reason for assailing my leading groups on camping and kayaking events into the wilderness areas I enjoy, in which case I always carry a pistol anyway.
 
Last edited:

One poor example... of something that he diden't even invent!

Liberals make mistakes too. (Yugoslavia is one of them). I'm mearly saying that if you'd rather live without electricity, good steel, air travail, all the things the space program has brought to us (such as sunglasses and protective cloths), most physics, most mathematics (and therefore modern architecture) the internet, the fire department, the police system, print, electronic print, modern language, ect. (these are just a small sampling... I'd rather not write them all. That would take hours if not days), then be my guest and go live in rural Congo somewhere.

And you still missed the other parts of my post.

And, without liberal thinkers, you never would have had a military career, quality checking, pistols, anti-venom, or bulletproof vests.
 
And, without liberal thinkers, you never would have had a military career, quality checking, pistols, anti-venom, or bulletproof vests.

...I can't even fathom the lack of thought it took to come to such a bizarre and mistaken conclusion...
 
One poor example... of something that he diden't even invent!

Liberals make mistakes too. (Yugoslavia is one of them). I'm mearly saying that if you'd rather live without electricity, good steel, air travail, all the things the space program has brought to us (such as sunglasses and protective cloths), most physics, most mathematics (and therefore modern architecture) the internet, the fire department, the police system, print, electronic print, modern language, ect. (these are just a small sampling... I'd rather not write them all. That would take hours if not days), then be my guest and go live in rural Congo somewhere.

And you still missed the other parts of my post.

And, without liberal thinkers, you never would have had a military career, quality checking, pistols, anti-venom, or bulletproof vests.

What I'm sure of is some fine liberal tried to write about all those things from the perspective of the nice wavy lines they make when you look at them on acid. Not much input beyond that came from liberals.
 
...I can't even fathom the lack of thought it took to come to such a bizarre and mistaken conclusion...


Really? Again with just insulting language.

Antivenom: Medicine, in virtually all its forms, is the product of liberal thinkers. A conservative thinker would have say either "You deserve to die because you where bitten" or "This is the work of a god! We must not interfer with gods!" or go with some long-debunked tribal method. Medical theory and most of its major early work was done by Hippocrates, a very liberal thinker, and made nearly all of its major advances in liberal societies.

Quality Checking: Very obvious. Quality checking was a design of governments, who wanted to make sure that businesses where playing fair with what they sold to people. A conservative thinker would say "Oh, they should just inform themselves" or "Let the companies police themselves" but the first is impossible, considering that without collective government requirements, the information would never be listed anyway, the people would likely never been paid enough (on average) to afford the real deal, and the later would be unprofitable... which companies would never accept.

Pistols: The old establishment (conservatives) where all for leaving the gunpowder invention behind for the old ways of "personally responsible" combat, hand on hand. Not only that, but liberals worked with all the science behind not only how to effectively make gunpowder, but how to safely and accurately use it by applying chemistry, math, and physics, as well as made the nessicery reforms to adopt it to the real world. The traditionalists where then blown, whey they initiated combat, into a personally responsible pile of guts.

Bulletproof Vest: Do you realize the amount of science that had to go into making those? How long real bullet-proof armor was virtually non-existant? Not only did it take liberal thinkers to accept a change in the status quo about gun combat and "honor", but also to find exactly what it was that would protect a person, as opposed to just praying to their deity of choice.

And yes, some liberals speak about the "wavey lines", but those are important too. Without basic chemical understanding, the only way to even get an idea about what, say, a new medicne would do it to stick it in a person... and if they die, you are held "personally responsible" for their death and shot/stoned. In other words, people would kill off alot of great talent on inevitable mistakes.


There are many liberals, however, who do much more "real" things, my your perception. Benjamin Franklin, for one. Hippocrates, whom I already mentioned, Henry Ford and his assembly line (which, ironically enough, restricted personal responsablity, making the process more efficient), and many, many others.

And while you continue to belittle liberal contributions (With NO evidence or explanation, I might add), I have yet to see you bring one example of conservative contributions of science.
 
Last edited:
Really? Again with just insulting language.

Antivenom: Medicine, in virtually all its forms, is the product of liberal thinkers. A conservative thinker would have say either "You deserve to die because you where bitten" or "This is the work of a god! We must not interfer with gods!" or go with some long-debunked tribal method. Medical theory and most of its major early work was done by Hippocrates, a very liberal thinker, and made nearly all of its major advances in liberal societies.

Quality Checking: Very obvious. Quality checking was a design of governments, who wanted to make sure that businesses where playing fair with what they sold to people. A conservative thinker would say "Oh, they should just inform themselves" or "Let the companies police themselves" but the first is impossible, considering that without collective government requirements, the information would never be listed anyway, the people would likely never been paid enough (on average) to afford the real deal, and the later would be unprofitable... which companies would never accept.

Pistols: The old establishment (conservatives) where all for leaving the gunpowder invention behind for the old ways of "personally responsible" combat, hand on hand. Not only that, but liberals worked with all the science behind not only how to effectively make gunpowder, but how to safely and accurately use it by applying chemistry, math, and physics, as well as made the nessicery reforms to adopt it to the real world. The traditionalists where then blown, whey they initiated combat, into a personally responsible pile of guts.

Bulletproof Vest: Do you realize the amount of science that had to go into making those? How long real bullet-proof armor was virtually non-existant? Not only did it take liberal thinkers to accept a change in the status quo about gun combat and "honor", but also to find exactly what it was that would protect a person, as opposed to just praying to their deity of choice.

And yes, some liberals speak about the "wavey lines", but those are important too. Without basic chemical understanding, the only way to even get an idea about what, say, a new medicne would do it to stick it in a person... and if they die, you are held "personally responsible" for their death and shot/stoned. In other words, people would kill off alot of great talent on inevitable mistakes.


There are many liberals, however, who do much more "real" things, my your perception. Benjamin Franklin, for one. Hippocrates, whom I already mentioned, Henry Ford and his assembly line (which, ironically enough, restricted personal responsablity, making the process more efficient), and many, many others.

And while you continue to belittle liberal contributions (With NO evidence or explanation, I might add), I have yet to see you bring one example of conservative contributions of science.

What we now have evidence for is the sweeping geneality of conjectural magnificence... creatively assuming credit for time and all travel within it... perhaps the factual data, such as the name of the developer of the first antivenom would have been a reach too far, going back into antiquity and all... no evidence or explanation indeed! Hippocrates a liberal? Henry Ford?
 
Last edited:
Are you more interested in setting up straw men to denigrate my career as a military officer, or as a Quality Manager in the Medical Device industry post military... it's important to know whether one should wear a bullet proof vest or a bring antivenom... or were you wanting to find reason for assailing my leading groups on camping and kayaking events into the wilderness areas I enjoy, in which case I always carry a pistol anyway.

No, I don't want to know about any of that, most of which you make up. A person who could actually accomplish all of those things would have learned more in the process than you.

I want to know how you shoulder personal responsibility. What does this actually mean to you?
 
No, I don't want to know about any of that, most of which you make up. A person who could actually accomplish all of those things would have learned more in the process than you.

I want to know how you shoulder personal responsibility. What does this actually mean to you?

I don't care what you think... as I said, you're only interested in strawman argumention, and calling people liars. I don't lie... I'm willing to contribute to any and all discussion, up to the point where the 'does not play well with others' notation becomes such an impediment that it is no longer worht the effort. For the record, I have the documentation (diplomas, DD214's, etc), none of whch am I ever going to post on a porn site for proof to some jerk for their frivolity, who has no respect for accomplishment anyway. Just to expalin why I'm adding you to those to whom I no longer respond....
 
I don't care what you think... as I said, you're only interested in strawman argumention, and calling people liars. I don't lie... I'm willing to contribute to any and all discussion, up to the point where the 'does not play well with others' notation becomes such an impediment that it is no longer worht the effort. For the record, I have the documentation (diplomas, DD214's, etc), none of whch am I ever going to post on a porn site for proof to some jerk for their frivolity, who has no respect for accomplishment anyway. Just to expalin why I'm adding you to those to whom I no longer respond....

That's no great loss to me.

I figured this would be your reaction. No one needs to post diplomas or certificates around here. The proof of what you have done and what you are in in your words.
 
That's no great loss to me.

I figured this would be your reaction. No one needs to post diplomas or certificates around here. The proof of what you have done and what you are in in your words.

He prefers to interact with the other derpers.
 
I don't care what you think... as I said, you're only interested in strawman argumention, and calling people liars. I don't lie... I'm willing to contribute to any and all discussion, up to the point where the 'does not play well with others' notation becomes such an impediment that it is no longer worht the effort. For the record, I have the documentation (diplomas, DD214's, etc), none of whch am I ever going to post on a porn site for proof to some jerk for their frivolity, who has no respect for accomplishment anyway. Just to expalin why I'm adding you to those to whom I no longer respond....

Your grammar really fucking collapses when you get rattled, doesn't it, Mensaboy?
 
I don't care what you think... as I said, you're only interested in strawman argumention, and calling people liars. I don't lie... I'm willing to contribute to any and all discussion, up to the point where the 'does not play well with others' notation becomes such an impediment that it is no longer worht the effort. For the record, I have the documentation (diplomas, DD214's, etc), none of whch am I ever going to post on a porn site for proof to some jerk for their frivolity, who has no respect for accomplishment anyway. Just to expalin why I'm adding you to those to whom I no longer respond....

Just a suggestion: GET OVER YOURSELF!
 
The only thing you will get from smoking hemp is a headache bro.

Even if it were the same plant, you don't smoke the fibrous tissue tissues of the stalk/stems that are used in the production of paper/textile/lumber/ rope etc. you smoke the flowers/ova of the unfertilized female plant.....it doesn't take a botanist to know that either, catch up on your basic biology there MENSA.

Heck, the Freak Brothers know that! Even Fat Freddy!
 
I don't care what you think... as I said, you're only interested in strawman argumention, and calling people liars. I don't lie... I'm willing to contribute to any and all discussion, up to the point where the 'does not play well with others' notation becomes such an impediment that it is no longer worht the effort. For the record, I have the documentation (diplomas, DD214's, etc), none of whch am I ever going to post on a porn site for proof to some jerk for their frivolity, who has no respect for accomplishment anyway. Just to expalin why I'm adding you to those to whom I no longer respond....

complete bullshit... you have demonstrated time and time again your complete unwillingness to answer direct questions

you move the goal posts when things don't go your way...and ignore actual facts if they dont fit your narrative


in short, you are a liar
 
complete bullshit... you have demonstrated time and time again your complete unwillingness to answer direct questions

you move the goal posts when things don't go your way...and ignore actual facts if they dont fit your narrative


in short, you are a liar

His diploma is from LTU.
 
Back
Top