The infamous Jack the Ripper was a WOMAN

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
Well, now, folks, it wasn't so bad since it wasn't a DUDE who was killing prostitutes back then...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/was-jack-the-ripper-a-woman-478597.html

Was Jack the Ripper a woman?
BY KATHY MARKS IN SYDNEY THURSDAY 18 MAY 2006

The notorious serial killer who stalked London's East End, butchering prostitutes and terrorising the population, may not have been Jack the Ripper - but Jill.

An Australian scientist has used swabs from letters supposedly sent to police by the Ripper to build a partial DNA profile of the killer. The results suggest that the person who murdered and mutilated at least five women from 1888 onwards may have been a woman.

Ian Findlay, a professor of molecular and forensic diagnostics, told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation that he had developed a profiling technique that could extract DNA from a single cell or strand of hair up to 160 years old. Conventional DNA sampling methods require at least 200 cells.

Dr Findlay, who is based in Brisbane, travelled to London, where the evidence from the still-unsolved murders is stored at the National Archive. The material, which was kept by Scotland Yard until 1961, includes letters sent to police at the time, some of them signed "Jack the Ripper". Most are believed to be fakes, but a handful are thought to have been written by the killer.

Dr Findlay took swabs from the back of stamps and from the gum used to seal envelopes, and possible bloodstains. He took his haul back to Brisbane, where - concentrating on swabs from the so-called "Openshaw letter", the one believed most likely to be genuine - he extracted the DNA and then amplified the information to create a profile. The resultswere "inconclusive" and not forensically reliable, but he did construct a partial profile and based on this analysis, he said, "it's possible the Ripper could be female".
 
But it would explain the hatred for prostitutes. Some snooty Victorian sociopath pulled a "Serial Mom" long before Kathleen Turner was born. Sick, but it wouldn't surprise me.

Then again, it was probably just a wannabe Freemason who got rejected by the lodge and took out his rage on the hookers because they gave him the clap. That makes a bit more sense, doesn't it? ;)
 
Well, now, folks, it wasn't so bad since it wasn't a DUDE who was killing prostitutes back then...



Dr Findlay, who is based in Brisbane, travelled to London, where the evidence from the still-unsolved murders is stored at the National Archive. The material, which was kept by Scotland Yard until 1961, includes letters sent to police at the time, some of them signed "Jack the Ripper". Most are believed to be fakes, but a handful are thought to have been written by the killer.

Dr Findlay took swabs from the back of stamps and from the gum used to seal envelopes, and possible bloodstains. He took his haul back to Brisbane, where - concentrating on swabs from the so-called "Openshaw letter", the one believed most likely to be genuine - he extracted the DNA and then amplified the information to create a profile. The resultswere "inconclusive" and not forensically reliable, but he did construct a partial profile and based on this analysis, he said, "it's possible the Ripper could be female".


so let me get this straight... there's a guy who tested a letter that might be fake and discovered his results were inconclusive and not forensically reliable, by his own omission...and this is somehow inviolable proof to you

words cannot describe the stupid
 
so let me get this straight... there's a guy who tested a letter that might be fake and discovered his results were inconclusive and not forensically reliable, by his own omission...and this is somehow inviolable proof to you

words cannot describe the stupid
Not QUITE as stupid as the century-old assumption that it was a man who did it.
 
The resultswere "inconclusive" and not forensically reliable, but he did construct a partial profile and based on this analysis, he said, "it's possible the Ripper could be female".

ffs. :rolleyes:
 
Not QUITE as stupid as the century-old assumption that it was a man who did it.

The openshaw letter that your link goes on about , has undergone myriad dna tests.. most notably by Patricia Cornwell who first put together the theory that either Walter Sickert or a woman was responsible

the only problem was that the DNA was so vague that it could have belonged to over 400 000 people


so,, to recap... an inconclusive and unreliable test on a letter that may or may not have beena fake that nets a result of one in 400 thousand ...... is your proof


that's what makes you think the other studies are stupid?

really?


really?
 
Well it makes a change from the it was a member of the royal family theory thats been doing the rounds for the past how many years.
 
The openshaw letter that your link goes on about , has undergone myriad dna tests.. most notably by Patricia Cornwell who first put together the theory that either Walter Sickert or a woman was responsible

the only problem was that the DNA was so vague that it could have belonged to over 400 000 people


so,, to recap... an inconclusive and unreliable test on a letter that may or may not have beena fake that nets a result of one in 400 thousand ...... is your proof


that's what makes you think the other studies are stupid?

really?


really?


I think this gif is what you're thinking.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2pg4xRhRc1qbha7to1_500.gif
 
People are still going on about the id of Jack the Ripper?
Move on!
There's more going on out there right now that could do with the combined resources that are being wasted on trying to figure out a century-old mystery that will likely never be solved anyway.
 
The openshaw letter that your link goes on about , has undergone myriad dna tests.. most notably by Patricia Cornwell who first put together the theory that either Walter Sickert or a woman was responsible

the only problem was that the DNA was so vague that it could have belonged to over 400 000 people


so,, to recap... an inconclusive and unreliable test on a letter that may or may not have beena fake that nets a result of one in 400 thousand ...... is your proof


that's what makes you think the other studies are stupid?

really?


really?
You're right, only a man could be a mass murderer. :rolleyes:
 
lt is afraid of any woman that threatens his 'masculinity'. he is shameful.
 
Back
Top