For the first time in U.S. history, Minority babies outnumber white newborns in 2011

RoryN

You're screwed.
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Posts
60,495
For myself, an interesting stat.

For folks like koala, vette, miles, renard, Ish, busy, eyer, NEM, etc.: a national tragedy. :rolleyes:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...orns-in-2011/2012/05/17/gIQAfVQHWU_story.html

Minority babies outnumbered white newborns in 2011

By Frank Bass, Published: May 16 |
Updated: Thursday, May 17, 6:33 AM

May 17 (Bloomberg) -- Minority babies outnumbered white newborns in 2011 for the first time in U.S. history, the latest milestone in a demographic shift that’s transforming the nation.

The percentage of white newborns fell to 49.6 percent of children younger than a year old from April 2010 to July 2011, the U.S. Census Bureau said today.

A shift in the District's minority population

The trend is likely to have a far-reaching impact on the country’s political alignment, the nature of its workforce and on its economic future. Predominantly white, older enclaves in the Northeast and Midwest will increasingly rely on an expanding population of young Asians and Hispanics in the West and Sun Belt to support Social Security and other retirement programs.

“This is a fundamental tipping point signaling a change in our demographic structure for decades to come,” William Frey, a demographer and senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington, said in an e-mail.

The figures highlight the rapid growth in the Hispanic and Asian populations, both of which have surged by more than 40 percent since 2000. Hispanics were 16.7 percent of the population in July 2011 and Asians were 4.8 percent. The black population has grown 12.9 percent since 2000 and makes up 12.3 percent of the nation. Non-Hispanic whites rose only 1.5 percent from 2000 to 2011, slower than the national growth of 9.7 percent, and are now 63.4 percent of the population.

Becoming a Minority

Four states -- Hawaii, California, New Mexico and Texas, plus the District of Columbia -- now have majority-minority populations.

A 2009 Census report estimated that non-Hispanic whites will become a minority of the total population after the 2040 Census, making up 48.5 percent in 2045. The government plans to release revised projections later this year, said Alexa Jones- Puthoff, chief of the bureau’s population estimates branch.

The Hispanic growth rate is being driven more by native births than immigration, according to the Pew Hispanic Center, which reported last month that the net migration from Mexico to the U.S. has stopped and may be reversing. The growth of Latino residents is the result of a younger population and higher fertility rates, said Jeffrey Passel, senior demographer for the Washington-based center.

“The younger the age group, the less white it is,” he said.

Accelerating Trend

In Georgia, the number of Hispanic babies grew 20.9 percent from April 2010 to July 2011, the fastest rate of any state. It will probably become majority-minority by 2025, said Matt Hauer, director of the University of Georgia’s Applied Demography Program.

“It’s been on this path for the last 10 or 20 years,” Hauer, a former Census Bureau statistician, said in a telephone interview. “But it’s been accelerating over the past decade. And it’s not just any one area -- this is a statewide phenomenon.”

The differences have become stark in Texas, said Mark Fossett, director of the Texas Census Research Data Center at Texas A&M University. The state added more Hispanic babies during the 15-month period to July 2011 than any other.

“If you’re 60 years old, this is an Anglo state,” he said. “That’s where you see the wealth, income, home ownership, and high-voting patterns. Anything else, especially below 18, the school-age population, looks Latino.”

Fossett said the increase in children is putting pressure on the school system in the state, where the legislature last year cut more than $5 billion in education funding from its two- year budget of $172.3 billion.

Inopportune Cuts

“Now, you’ve got all your standard requirements for meeting the needs of an urban economy and a large school population whose parents have lower educational levels and lower incomes,” he said. “This is occurring right at a time when Texas is cutting down on education spending.”

Texas is home to the nation’s two most minority counties -- Maverick at 96.8 percent and Webb at 96.4 percent.

The transition to a majority-minority nation won’t be smooth, said Passel, the Pew demographer. Even so, he said, the U.S. has proven its ability to absorb new racial and ethnic groups in the past.

“If you go back 100 years, groups that are now considered part of the majority white population were perceived as minorities,” he said. “Over time, we’ll change the way we perceive these categories.”

Social Security

That perception may change even faster with the realization that younger nonwhite workers will play a bigger role in helping shore up financially strapped retirement and other social- welfare programs.

The Social Security trust funds that pay retirement, disability and survivor’s benefits to one in four U.S. households will be exhausted by 2033, the program’s trustees said in a report released last month. The main fund that pays for the federal Medicare health-insurance program for the elderly will run out of money in 2024, the report said.

Currently, there are 4.8 working-age Americans for every person older than 65. By 2035, that number will fall to 2.8 people per retiree.
 
Of course, I'm sure the definition of "minority" here includes many Latinos who would be counted "white" if "Hispanic" or "Latino" were not a category.
 
I bet it leads to a rethinking of freely available birth control and abortion.
 
How can a minority outnumber a majority?

I think we need to start using a different word.
 
Ha, yeah. A magical shift in policy support. ;)



Just swap which term belongs to who. I'm sure the right fringe is already hard at work on that one.

Probably. It does raise interesting questions about stuff like affirmative action and quotas and the like.
 
Probably. It does raise interesting questions about stuff like affirmative action and quotas and the like.

Indeed.

Let's see: it took us about 230 years to get to the point we were doing affirmative action. So, 229 to go...:D
 
I know it's all over the news, but it's meaningless. Say 'almost half the babies born in this country are white' and it doesn't sound quite as ominous. It's not.
 
I know it's all over the news, but it's meaningless. Say 'almost half the babies born in this country are white' and it doesn't sound quite as ominous. It's not.

Socially speaking, it means quite a bit. It's like a bitch slap to those who use and coast on the invisible knapsack of white hegemony privilege.

Chronologically speaking, it may be meaningless because none of us will be alive to see the physical results of what life's going to be like in 2100 with a non-white majority in this country and the Earth as a greater whole.
 
Socially speaking, it means quite a bit. It's like a bitch slap to those who use and coast on the invisible knapsack of white hegemony privilege.

Chronologically speaking, it may be meaningless because none of us will be alive to see the physical results of what life's going to be like in 2100 with a non-white majority in this country and the Earth as a greater whole.
I'm glad my kids are growing up in a full-color world. But I like to think we'd have made sure they did anyway. Hard to know.
 
Does this mean white people can now get welfare and hired fo jobs they awe not qualified fo to meet the quota?

Now that is wetawded.
 
I'm glad my kids are growing up in a full-color world. But I like to think we'd have made sure they did anyway. Hard to know.

Among my earliest memories are the once a week visits by black kids from the city to our rural whitebread home. I was pre-kindergarten, so this would be ca. 1968 or 1969. Apparently there was some sort of program in place, so kids of differing "races" could meet each other. My brother and sister would have been around eight and nine years old.

It's funny, looking back on that era, the things that people did to try to "fix" the "race problem." My sister now has a black fiance, an adopted Korean kid, and a biological white kid. It often occurs to me that my niece and nephew are probably completely incapable of racism.
 
Among my earliest memories are the once a week visits by black kids from the city to our rural whitebread home. I was pre-kindergarten, so this would be ca. 1968 or 1969. Apparently there was some sort of program in place, so kids of differing "races" could meet each other. My brother and sister would have been around eight and nine years old.

It's funny, looking back on that era, the things that people did to try to "fix" the "race problem." My sister now has a black fiance, an adopted Korean kid, and a biological white kid. It often occurs to me that my niece and nephew are probably completely incapable of racism.

Why awe they incapable?
 
Does this mean white people can now get welfare and hired fo jobs they awe not qualified fo to meet the quota?

Now that is wetawded.

jeninflorida/neverendingmeme is on welfare, and he's white. I can't think of anyone else on here that's on welfare, so that makes it 100% white welfare recipients.
 
I'm glad my kids are growing up in a full-color world. But I like to think we'd have made sure they did anyway. Hard to know.

I'm happy to live in the here and now, despite all the bullshit. But I am interested to know what it would feel like to socially not have to deal with some of the color-related bullshit that goes on today, by default of a majority and social norm that is no longer templated from a white hegemony. Shit would be going down as usual because human beans will always be human beans, but it wouldn't be the same shit that goes on now.

Will it be like Star Trek? What do you think Tom Cruise's character saw when he woke up in the future time of Vanilla Sky? The future, the future...
 
I was reading somewhere, probably quoted in some blog, a douche bemoaning the "Brazilification" of the US, as if that were a bad thing.

We need to mix and mingle the races, until all "white" girls have Rio g string thong asses.
 
I was reading somewhere, probably quoted in some blog, a douche bemoaning the "Brazilification" of the US, as if that were a bad thing.

We need to mix and mingle the races, until all "white" girls have Rio g string thong asses.

It is a bad thing, and does not mean what you think it does.

From The Next American Nation, by Michael Lind:

The chief danger confronting the twenty-first century United States is not Balkanization but what might be called Brazilianization. By Brazilianization I mean not the separation of cultures by race, but the separation of races by class. As in Brazil, a common American culture could be indefinitely compatible with a blurry, informal caste system in which most of those at the top of the social hierarchy are white, and most brown and black Americans are on the bottom -- forever. Behind all the boosterish talk about the wonders of the new American rainbow is the reality of enduring racial division by class, something that multicultural education initiatives and racial preference policies do not begin to address.

In the absence of sustained popular pressure from below or concern about America's international status, the white overclass has no incentive to combat Brazilianization in the United States. For one thing, any serious effort to reduce racial separation by class would inevitably mean higher taxes on the affluent -- not just the rich, but the politically powerful upper-middle class. What is more, the dominance of the white oligarchy in American politics is strengthened by the emergent dynamics of a polarized society. In a more homogeneous society, the increasing concentration of wealth and power at the top might produce a populist reaction by the majority. But in a society like that of present-day America where a small, homogeneous oligarchy confronts a diverse population that shares a common national culture but remains divided along racial lines, the position of the outnumbered elite can be very secure. This is because the resentments caused by economic decline are likely to be expressed as hostility between the groups at the bottom, rather than as a rebellion against the top. In the Los Angeles riot, black, Hispanic, and white rioters turned on Korean middlemen, rather than march on Beverly Hills.
 
Just swap which term belongs to who. I'm sure the right fringe is already hard at work on that one.

Oh don't you just know they are....ready to jump on that minority bandwagon and ride that bitch to death!!

Probably. It does raise interesting questions about stuff like affirmative action and quotas and the like.

No shit right. I also wonder how this will effect mixed people like myself. I'm Swedish/Korean mix....I usually just pick whatever race is best for me, which is always the Asian/Pacific Islander option. Should I start filling out all my paperwork as a white boy now???:confused:
 
I was reading somewhere, probably quoted in some blog, a douche bemoaning the "Brazilification" of the US, as if that were a bad thing.

We need to mix and mingle the races, until all "white" girls have Rio g string thong asses.

Not a bad thing at all...many skinny white girls could use a better ass.
 
Back
Top