cheesehead2
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2006
- Posts
- 444
some day you dip shits can participate in the real world by doing big boy things. i.e. jobs and buying a home
AMEN. Think they fit in big boy pants.?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
some day you dip shits can participate in the real world by doing big boy things. i.e. jobs and buying a home
AMEN. Think they fit in big boy pants.?
http://spectator.org/archives/2012/05/08/forget-france-the-greek-electiFinancial journalist Martin Hutchinson described the system very well:
This means that the effects of capital flight are doubled. Not only does the central bank of Greece have an existing imbalance with the Bundesbank, the German central bank, but when a Greek moves his money from Greece to Germany, the imbalance grows larger.When a Greek makes a large euro payment to a German, his Greek bank makes a payment to the Greek central bank, which makes a payment to the Bundesbank, which pays the German bank, which pays the German. This is quite different to the U.S. system. There is no central bank of Alabama intermediating dollar payments between Alabama and New York, and there was equally no need for such intermediation in the [E]urozone -- it just gave the otherwise redundant national central banks something apparently useful to do.
Now consider what would happen if Greece were on the verge of default. The fear of successive default by the other shaky economies -- Spain, Portugal, and Italy -- would lead to rapid capital flight from those countries to Germany. The Bundesbank is probably able to absorb the effects of Greek default and capital flight, but it simply could not absorb the capital flight from other countries. Germany may well be forced to leave the euro rather than subject itself to this risk. This could all happen extremely quickly.
Should Americans be worried? Yes, because the United States will be caught up in a crisis it could have helped prevent. The European Project that now stands on the precipice of self-inflicted destruction was enthusiastically supported by successive U.S. presidents, who all urged Europe down the path to union for the simple reason of diplomatic convenience. If the scenario I have outlined above comes to pass, we may see a banking crisis that could make 2008 look like a walk in the park.
http://mises.org/daily/6020/The-Case-against-Student-AidFor decades, Federal Financial Aid (FFA) programs have been implemented and expanded to make higher education "affordable" for students. The ostensible merits are obvious: loans, grants, and work-study schemes allow students to purchase education without much need for cash or other sources of private funding — a supposed benefit to students who otherwise might not be able to pay for college.
However, as Bastiat instructed, "It almost always happens that when the immediate consequence is favorable, the later consequences are disastrous, and vice versa." Surely, to the credulous eye, the immediate consequences of FFA have solidified its standing as a model of successful federal intervention. Virtually all students who are admitted to college qualify for FFA, which has helped fuel a substantial increase in matriculation rates. This illusory victory is but a distraction from the later and disastrous consequences that Bastiat warned of.
The unintended consequences of FFA are numerous, indeed. Skyrocketing tuition, high default rates, and pathetic graduation rates — to name a few — are all byproducts of a system that incentivizes inefficiency, largess, and misguided decisions. Oddly, while many students aren't legally permitted to take a sip of alcohol, they are systematically encouraged to contract into years of, essentially, indentured servitude. It is evident that the aggregate result of FFA is net harm.
The market is still trending down...
![]()
![]()
Hmmm...
Stocks slide on Europe worries
First Monthly Budget Surplus in Three Years
By Michael Ono | ABC OTUS News – 4 hrs ago
The Congressional Budget Office has reporteda monthly budget surplus of $58 billion, which would be a first in nearly three years.
The improved numbers are attributed to a 10 percent increase in tax revenue. The month of April coincides with tax season which typically results in a yearly surplus, but hasn't happened since the 2008 financial crisis when tax revenue fell.
"It is a clear signal that the government's fiscal situation is finally moving definitively in the right direction," said Mark Zandi who is the chief economist for Moody's Analytics.
Next month's report will likely show a budget deficit, but the small surplus is an important milestone in the nation's struggle to fend of a future debt crisis.
The market is still trending down...
And here's a story you wont hear about from conservatives. But get ready for some spin!
And here's a story you wont hear about from conservatives. But get ready for some spin!
wow...since three years huh???
Hmmmm wonder who was president then.
Of course that matters as much as your article.
Why did you bring it up if it doesn't matter? What's your point? No point?
My point is you are a partisan nut bag with no idea of the real world. You search for shit that supports your political position, that was given to you by your parents, and post it like it means something while not even understanding it. You accuse others of spin while doing it yourself and have probably never had a original thought your whole life. You get in arguments with the right wing nut bags here and do not realize you may as well be arguing with the man in the mirror. You are the exact same.....
My point is you are a partisan nut bag with no idea of the real world. You search for shit that supports your political position, that was given to you by your parents, and post it like it means something while not even understanding it. You accuse others of spin while doing it yourself and have probably never had a original thought your whole life. You get in arguments with the right wing nut bags here and do not realize you may as well be arguing with the man in the mirror. You are the exact same.....
My point is you are a partisan nut bag with no idea of the real world. You search for shit that supports your political position, that was given to you by your parents, and post it like it means something while not even understanding it. You accuse others of spin while doing it yourself and have probably never had a original thought your whole life. You get in arguments with the right wing nut bags here and do not realize you may as well be arguing with the man in the mirror. You are the exact same.....
This is how this thread reads:
LW: Hey, they economy is adding +130k to +200k jobs per month. That's better than -600k jobs per month. Things seem to be looking up.
RW: No it's not! That's just partisan spin! Oh and the market is collapsing today because of left wing policies.
LW: The Dow is down .08 and the NASDAQ is actually up.
RW: *silence as the next day dawns* Okay today is the day the market will crash.
LW: The Dow is -43% and NASDAQ is -23%.
RW: *silence* Well the price of oil dropped.
LW: That's a bad thing? I thought you were attacking Obama for it's high price just a minute ago.
RW: *silence* The percentage of people wanting to work dropped. It's Obama's fault. People are too discouraged to work because of him!
LW: Here's some market analysis linking that to the retirement of the baby boomers. And also here's some data on discouraged workers. As you can see their numbers are holding steady and decreasing as a percentage of the overall population when you account for the population increase.
RW: *no response*
LW: No response?
RW: You're partisan since you're referencing market research instead of right wing political pundits.
LW:![]()
please add in some bull shit that we need higher taxes. that we need 150k more jobs per month, and forget the fact that most of these jobs are low end service jobs
Merc, master of bullshit