What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

Status
Not open for further replies.
last week, NPR actually said

IS SLOW GROWTH

GOOD FOR THE ECONOMY?



Hell YES, more on teh dole, more DUMOH voters

It's the million-man multiplier effect of government benefits!

You steal from the rich and the middle-class and you give to the poor and the OWS student body...
 
HALF A MILLION PEOPLE DROPPED OUT OF THE LABOR FORCE!!!


:) Yes but great for Obama the rate dropped to 8.1%,2M more & he's in
 
Biggest gainer in jobs report: Administrative and waste services (again)! Up by 32.3k.



In other words

Cleaning up shit and recording it:rolleyes:
 
Biggest gainer in jobs report: Administrative and waste services (again)! Up by 32.3k.



In other words

Cleaning up shit and recording it:rolleyes:

Would that be the magicians NOAA hired?

They probably could have pooled with the GSA...



I KNOW!!!

Let's talk ANN's WARDROBE!
 
HOW’S THAT HOPEY-CHANGE STUFF WORKIN’ OUT FOR YA? (CONT’D): People Not In Labor Force Soar By 522,000, Labor Force Participation Rate Lowest Since 1981.“It is just getting sad now. In April the number of people not in the labor force rose by a whopping 522,000 from 87,897,000 to 88,419,000. This is the highest on record. The flip side, and the reason why the unemployment dropped to 8.1% is that the labor force participation rate just dipped to a new 30 year low of 64.3%.”
 
So, do busybody and AJ agree that Reagan was a worse president than Obama, since he presided over worse un-employment?
 
Even you guys must be smart enough to realize that Jimmy Carter got thrown out of office in January 1981. The huge number of unemployed was only part of the disaster RR had to fix. The difference is, he did fix it. Unlike Bozo, who has no idea what he is doing.
 
So, do busybody and AJ agree that Reagan was a worse president than Obama, since he presided over worse un-employment?

Nice spin fuck nut!


Regan inherited a 8.5% unemployment. By the end of his first term it was 8.0%, by the end of his second term it was 5.3%....... But way to create a great fallacy!

Obama started at 7.3 and is now 8.1.....do you see the difference?

But that does not even tell the true story you see.... As the amount of people that have giving up, stopped looking, or claimed false disability with the S.S., is at a ll time high!


( labor market)

http://data.bls.gov/generated_files/graphics/LNS11300000_72985_1336150344349.gif
 
Of course not!

That....That....That's..(say it with me class! Loud and PROUD!)...
That's DIFFERENT!

DERP!!!!!! read the post above you...if you do not understand it PM me and I will give you a class.....


The civilian labor force shrank in April by 342,000 workers, and remains below where it stood when the economic recovery started 34 months ago, according to data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Had the labor force not declined, unemployment would have been 8.3% in April, instead of the 8.1% reported.

That same month, more than 225,000 workers applied for Social Security disability benefits, and nearly 90,000 were enrolled, according to new data from the Social Security Administration.

Compared with June 2009, the month the economic recovery officially started, the labor force has shrunk by 365,000, a trend that has never occurred in any post World War 11 recovery. Those saw the labor force climb by the millions by this point in their recoveries, even as unemployment rates were driven down.

The decline in the workforce combined with the growing population has pushed the labor force participation rate — which compares those working or looking for a job the working age population — fell again in April to 63.6%. That's down from 65.7% in mid-2009, and is the lowest it's been since 1981
 
Last edited:
http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/06/news/economy/obama_reagan_recovery/index.htm


"Reagan had an advantage over Obama: The recession of the early 1980s was caused by runaway inflation, which the Federal Reserve countered by hiking interest rates. When inflation dropped, the Fed lowered rates and a massive economic boom resulted.

"The monetary policy run by [Fed chairman] Paul Volcker was extremely successful," said Rudolph Penner, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office. "When inflation went away, that laid the groundwork for a very rapid recovery."
 
http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/06/news/economy/obama_reagan_recovery/index.htm


"Reagan had an advantage over Obama: The recession of the early 1980s was caused by runaway inflation, which the Federal Reserve countered by hiking interest rates. When inflation dropped, the Fed lowered rates and a massive economic boom resulted.

"The monetary policy run by [Fed chairman] Paul Volcker was extremely successful," said Rudolph Penner, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office. "When inflation went away, that laid the groundwork for a very rapid recovery."

Ha! well at least you understood my posts enough to go search for additional spin....but no, thisdoes not help.
 
Nice spin fuck nut!
Regan inherited a 8.5% unemployment. By the end of his first term it was 8.0%, by the end of his second term it was 5.3%....... But way to create a great fallacy!

Obama started at 7.3 and is now 8.1.....do you see the difference?

Bless your ignorant cherry-pickin' heart!

Way to compare Reagan's eight year average to Obama's three year average. Can you say Apples-to-Oranges! Sure you can!

Let's look at unemployment for the first three years of Reagan vs. the first three years of Obama:

Reagan:
1981 - 7.6%
1982 - 9.7%
1983 - 9.6%

Obama:
2009 - 9.3%
2010 - 9.6%
2011 - 8.9%

Now, unless you're using PatriotMath™ like AJ and Vetty do, 9.7% is higher than 9.6%, so Reagan did have worse unemployment than Obama did. And let's not forget that Obama inherited a far bigger mess to clean up from the failed Bush regime than Reagan did from Carter.

I hope I've lessened your ignorance somewhat.
 
Attention NIGGERWIFE and NIGGERPOOP

Oh wait, Im on IGGY:rolleyes:, so you wont see this


Pelosi When Unemployment Rate Was At 4.4% Under Bush: This President Has “The Worst Jobs Record Since The Great Depression”…




No comment on Obama’s 39 straight months of unemployment above 8%.

Via NRO’s Jim Geraghty:


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, December 21, 2002: “This is a crisis.” Unemployment rate at that time: 6.0 percent.

The New York Daily News, 11/2/2003: “The good news that economic growth leaped from June through September runs smack up against the miserable realities of a 6.1% U.S. unemployment rate and a state jobless rate of 8.8%. Until those figures drop, there is no cause for celebration in the streets. Count reviving the national economy as one mission that President Bush hasn’t accomplished.”

November 2006: “Pelosi was not to be outdone, however, firing back at the president who she claimed had “the worst jobs record since the Great Depression,” in spite of Friday’s news that the October jobless rate fell to 4.4 percent, the lowest it has been in more than five years.”
 
Bless your ignorant cherry-pickin' heart!

Way to compare Reagan's eight year average to Obama's three year average. Can you say Apples-to-Oranges! Sure you can!

Let's look at unemployment for the first three years of Reagan vs. the first three years of Obama:

Reagan:
1981 - 7.6%
1982 - 9.7%
1983 - 9.6%

Obama:
2009 - 9.3%
2010 - 9.6%
2011 - 8.9%

Now, unless you're using PatriotMath™ like AJ and Vetty do, 9.7% is higher than 9.6%, so Reagan did have worse unemployment than Obama did. And let's not forget that Obama inherited a far bigger mess to clean up from the failed Bush regime than Reagan did from Carter.

I hope I've lessened your ignorance somewhat.

:eek: DERP!


2009 7.8 8.3 8.7 8.9 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.8 10.0 9.9 9.9
2010 9.7 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.6 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.5 9.5 9.8 9.4
2011 9.1 9.0 8.9 9.0 9.0 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.0 8.9 8.7 8.5
2012 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.1
 
Last edited:
Today’s Questions for the President, and NIGGERWIFE and NIGGERPOOP









The unemployment rate for April was 8.1 percent. The unemployment rate has now been above 8 percent for 39 months. When you were selling your stimulus plan in 2009, you predicted the unemployment rate would not rise above 8 percent, and that it would be approximately 5.5 percent today.

The unemployment rate has not been this high this long since the Great Depression.

The labor-participation rate continues to fall, hitting a 30-year low of 63.6 percent. Indeed, the unemployment rate today would be 8.9 percent had not more than 1 million Americans dropped out of the labor force in the last year alone. If the labor-participation rate today were the same as when you took office, the unemployment rate would be 11 percent.

What specific policies do you propose for a second term to bring the unemployment rate down to 5.5 percent? Do you expect to have more “flexibility” in a second term to implement such policies? What evidence can you provide voters that such policies will be any more successful than your policies of the last three and a half years?
 
FLASHBACK: Biden predicts 500,000 jobs each month “some time in the next couple of months.” “This was two years ago. How’s that coming along, Joe?”



Joke ByeDumb, as big a NIGGER as is NIGGERPOOP and NIGGERWIFE
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top