Poisoning trees to make billboards easier to see

koalabear

~Armed and Fuzzy~
Joined
Mar 14, 2001
Posts
101,964
Robert J. Barnhart was a crew chief for a billboard company, and a soldier in a war on trees.

Trees were the enemy if they spoiled the view of a billboard. On days of an attack, Barnhart, 27, would arrive by dawn at Lamar Advertising Co. in Tallahassee, Fla. After removing the magnetic Lamar logo from a company truck, he would set forth with a machete, a hospital mask and a container of what he described as a "pretty gnarly" herbicide.

Barnhart claims he was fired by Lamar Advertising in August 2011 when he refused to continue poisoning trees that blocked the view of Lamar billboards. He has been granted immunity in a criminal investigation, and has sued over loss of his job.

http://openchannel.msnbc.msn.com/_n...soning-trees-to-make-billboards-easier-to-see
 
Do people really base choices on billboard advertising anyway? The billboards are the things that should be cut down...
 
A few years ago a law/regulation was passed that allows trees to be removed within 500' either direction of billboards.
Guess what the minimum allowable distance (set in the same regulation) is between billboards.
 
So much for the republican mantra, "We can always trust the American Corporation To do the Right Thing. Regulation impedes Business".
 
Back
Top