Yes Mr. Holder, Voting Fraud Is Not A Problem

RightField · Apr 9, 2012

Good one.

That guy could have walked away with Holder's vote and there'd have been no recourse, no evidence and now way to prosecute. Then the libs say "you can't prove voter fraud because you don't have any convictions....but they've set up the system so that voter fraud is almost risk-free and there's almost no evidence and so convictions are rare, almost impossible unless the perpetrator is really really stupid.

To make the claim that there's no voter fraud because there's no convictions is a false equivalency.

It's like saying there's no speeding on the freeway when there's an unmonitored section of freeway and no speeding tickets handed out.

unregistered · Apr 9, 2012

Liar · Apr 9, 2012

Not sure what the news is, other than typically O'Keefian footage. Is voter fraud technically possible? Sure, by this method and many others. Was that ever denied?

I thought the debate was more along the lines of whether it, you know, happens? And what side effects adressing it may have.

This looks to me like a very shiny but none the less red herrring.

Makes for pretty bold font headlines on certain blogs though.

phrodeau · Apr 9, 2012

Quit trying to give the government more power over us. We can't afford another bloated bureaucracy. What's wrong with you guys?

busybody.. · Apr 9, 2012

Liar said:
Not sure what the news is, other than typically O'Keefian footage. Is voter fraud technically possible? Sure, by this method and many others. Was that ever denied?

I thought the debate was more along the lines of whether it, you know, happens? And what side effects adressing it may have.

This looks to me like a very shiny but none the less red herrring.

Makes for pretty bold font headlines on certain blogs though.

STFU, Clown!

bra_man69 · Apr 9, 2012

I'll be back faster then you can say furious! LOL

busybody.. · Apr 9, 2012

busybody said:
STFU, Clown!

jackass, its called ID

the same ID you scream about

(couched of course in BULLSHIT)

NeverEndingMe · Apr 9, 2012

I think its funny that Al Gore will be battling Keith Olberman in court. just another example as to why Democrats make for fucked up leaders / business people.

busybody said:
jackass, its called ID

the same ID you scream about

(couched of course in BULLSHIT)

JoeRockStar · Apr 9, 2012

Saw that this morning, absolutely brilliant! It absolutely boggles the mind how the left can be 100% in favor of an internet ID and card check ID but oppose voter ID. There's only one possible reason - they count on FRAUD to win elections.

RobDownSouth · Apr 9, 2012

JoeRockStar said:
Saw that this morning, absolutely brilliant! It absolutely boggles the mind how the left can be 100% in favor of an internet ID and card check ID but oppose voter ID. There's only one possible reason - they count on FRAUD to win elections.

Derp?

JoeRockStar · Apr 9, 2012

Oh and how's this for delicious irony? Holder is clearly a RACIST!!!

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinio...l0bBHLM?utm_medium=rss&utm_content=Editorials

Why does Attorney General Eric Holder hate minorities?
For that matter, why are liberal groups like the Center for American Progress, the Advancement Project and the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law all so fiendishly bigoted?

Those groups and the Justice Department all require photo ID to access their Washington offices, as a report from Pajamas Media pointed out last week.
So, by the warped logic deployed against state voter-ID laws, they must have some ulterior motive — presumably to keep out blacks and Hispanics, who are less likely to have government-issued ID.

Absurd?
After all, the list of everyday activities requiring a photo ID is close to endless. It includes:
* Picking up mail at the Post Office.
* Checking out darts at a pub.
* Buying Sudafed.
* Getting a library card.
* Cashing a check.
* Receiving federal or state welfare.
* Shopping at Costco.
* And taking the SAT.
Nevertheless, Holder has blocked voter-ID laws in Texas and South Carolina — which require voters to prove their identity at the polls — from taking effect, on the grounds that they violate the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

bra_man69 · Apr 9, 2012

Does anyone know if you must show id to get snap? I keep hearing it on the radio.

NeverEndingMe · Apr 9, 2012

We all know that Eric Holder is a criminal

vetteman said:
O'KEEFE VOTER FRAUD INVESTIGATION: YOUNG MAN OFFERED HOLDER'S BALLOT

In a shocking new video, James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas demonstrates to the Attorney General of the United States, Eric Holder, just why he should be concerned about lack of voter ID laws – by walking into Holder’s voting precinct and showing the world that anyone can obtain Eric Holder’s ballot. Literally.

The video shows a young man entering a Washington, DC polling place at 3401 Nebraska Avenue, NW, on primary day of this year – April 3, 2012 – and giving Holder’s name and address. The poll worker promptly offers the young man Holder’s ballot to vote.

Holder has maintained that voter fraud is not a major problem in the United States, and that voter ID would not curb voter fraud in any case.

Project Veritas has already shown how dead people can vote in New Hampshire, prompting the state senate to pass a voter ID law; they’ve shown celebrities like Tim Tebow and Tom Brady registering to vote in Minnesota, prompting the state legislature to put voter ID on the ballot as a constitutional amendment. Washington DC voting law is a federal jurisdictional area. Will the federal government take up the challenge?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/08/DC-Polling-Place-Holder-Ballot

dicknjane · Apr 9, 2012

They are arguing in court for requiring you buy health insurance, but against requiring an ID to vote.

What is the hardship created by having to get a free ID from the wonderful government vs buying private insurance from a greedy corporation run by the infamous 1%er's.

koalabear · Apr 9, 2012

dicknjane said:
They are arguing in court for requiring you buy health insurance, but against requiring an ID to vote.

What is the hardship created by having to get a free ID from the wonderful government vs buying private insurance from a greedy corporation run by the infamous 1%er's.

You'll need an I.D. to get the free insurance.

bra_man69 · Apr 9, 2012

koalabear said:
You'll need an I.D. to get the free insurance.

Got question can it be matricula consular id?

koalabear · Apr 9, 2012

bra_man69 said:
Got question can it be matricula consular id?

Only new State photo I.D.'s with facial recognition.

BoyNextDoor · Apr 9, 2012

vetteman said:
O'KEEFE VOTER FRAUD INVESTIGATION: YOUNG MAN OFFERED HOLDER'S BALLOT

In a shocking new video, James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas demonstrates to the Attorney General of the United States, Eric Holder, just why he should be concerned about lack of voter ID laws – by walking into Holder’s voting precinct and showing the world that anyone can obtain Eric Holder’s ballot. Literally.

The video shows a young man entering a Washington, DC polling place at 3401 Nebraska Avenue, NW, on primary day of this year – April 3, 2012 – and giving Holder’s name and address. The poll worker promptly offers the young man Holder’s ballot to vote.

Holder has maintained that voter fraud is not a major problem in the United States, and that voter ID would not curb voter fraud in any case.

Project Veritas has already shown how dead people can vote in New Hampshire, prompting the state senate to pass a voter ID law; they’ve shown celebrities like Tim Tebow and Tom Brady registering to vote in Minnesota, prompting the state legislature to put voter ID on the ballot as a constitutional amendment. Washington DC voting law is a federal jurisdictional area. Will the federal government take up the challenge?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/08/DC-Polling-Place-Holder-Ballot

Voter ID is not really the issue. For the most part people agree that showing some form of identification at the polls is fine. It is the implementation of the generally good idea with an intent to fuck solid hardworking Americans out of their right to vote that is the issue.

busybody.. · Apr 9, 2012

boyNextDoor2010 said:
Voter ID is not really the issue. For the most part people agree that showing some form of identification at the polls is fine. It is the implementation of the generally good idea with an intent to fuck solid hardworking Americans out of their right to vote that is the issue.

who is trying to FUCK anyone out of voting and HOW?

Oh wait

IM ON IGGY!

easier than to answer questions, aint it?

TexasWife25 · Apr 9, 2012

boyNextDoor2010 said:
Voter ID is not really the issue. For the most part people agree that showing some form of identification at the polls is fine. It is the implementation of the generally good idea with an intent to fuck solid hardworking Americans out of their right to vote that is the issue.

^^^ this.

NeverEndingMe · Apr 9, 2012

boyNextDoor2010 said:
Voter ID is not really the issue. For the most part people agree that showing some form of identification at the polls is fine. It is the implementation of the generally good idea with an intent to fuck solid hardworking Americans out of their right to vote that is the issue.

but how can dead people vote if they are required to show ID?

koalabear · Apr 9, 2012

NeverEndingMe said:
but how can dead people vote if they are required to show ID?

Ignore pereg's brother.

busybody.. · Apr 9, 2012

TexasWife25 said:
^^^ this.

the BLIND leading teh BLIND

unregistered · Apr 9, 2012

Yes Mr. Holder, Voting Fraud Is Not A Problem

unregistered

Guest

Literotica Guru

unregistered

Guest

now with 17% more class

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

No Kings

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Literotica Guru

Really Experienced

~Armed and Fuzzy~

Literotica Guru

~Armed and Fuzzy~

I hate liars

Literotica Guru

Porn Buddy

Literotica Guru

~Armed and Fuzzy~

Literotica Guru

unregistered

Guest

Similar threads