The Republican War on Voter Registration

you ------------------------------------------------------ > the thread topic.

I have no idea what you meant.

But I was defending the the voter registration law by debunking an argument of those opposed that state inconvenience as one reason they do not like having to get an ID.
 
I just heard Nikki Haley talk on Kudlow.

They reviewed that Obama and gang precluded South Carolina from implementing the voter ID law that they had voted for and had a discussion about it.

Governor Haley said that Obama et al said that the voter ID law would serve to suppress turnout because a lot of people couldn't afford the ID nor could they get to a government site to get one.

She made them free, no cost for the ID's and then set up a 1800 number for anyone in SC to call and get a free ride to and back from their home in order to get a free ID. They got only 23 calls.

lol. Just another democrat fairy tail.
 
I just heard Nikki Haley talk on Kudlow.

They reviewed that Obama and gang precluded South Carolina from implementing the voter ID law that they had voted for and had a discussion about it.

Governor Haley said that Obama et al said that the voter ID law would serve to suppress turnout because a lot of people couldn't afford the ID nor could they get to a government site to get one.

She made them free, no cost for the ID's and then set up a 1800 number for anyone in SC to call and get a free ride to and back from their home in order to get a free ID. They got only 23 calls.

lol. Just another democrat fairy tail.

Yup. Offer them for free, and they still do not take advantage of it.
 
I just heard Nikki Haley talk on Kudlow.

They reviewed that Obama and gang precluded South Carolina from implementing the voter ID law that they had voted for and had a discussion about it.

Governor Haley said that Obama et al said that the voter ID law would serve to suppress turnout because a lot of people couldn't afford the ID nor could they get to a government site to get one.

She made them free, no cost for the ID's and then set up a 1800 number for anyone in SC to call and get a free ride to and back from their home in order to get a free ID. They got only 23 calls.

lol. Just another democrat fairy tail.

If you faux 'individual rights' Republicans had their way, everyone would get a bar code tattoo'd on their forehead.
 
Republican state legislatures aren’t only trying to prevent voting at the polling place, they are also stopping people from becoming registered voters in the first place. These same laws that require voters to present state issued photo identification at the polling both—nominally aimed at preventing voter fraud—also sometimes contain provisions that are placing onerous requirements and stringent limitations on third party voter registration efforts.


WHAT STRINGENT REQUIREMENTS????????????????

Tell me

Its OK,

I'll wait:rolleyes:

Still waiting:cool:
 
so you mean

BLACKS

THE ELDERLY

COLLEGE STUDENTS

dont have allergies?

Cause they cant get SUDAFED without ID:rolleyes:
 
Why We Need Voter-ID Laws Now
By John Fund, NRO
April 9, 2012 12:00 A.M.

Attorney General Eric Holder is a staunch opponent of laws requiring voters to show photo ID at the polls to improve ballot security. He calls them “unnecessary” and has blocked their implementation in Texas and South Carolina, citing the fear they would discriminate against minorities.

I wonder what Holder will think when he learns just how easy it was for someone to be offered his ballot just by mentioning his name in a Washington, D.C., polling place in Tuesday’s primaries.

Holder’s opposition to ID laws comes in spite of the Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision in 2008, authored by liberal Justice John Paul Stevens, that upheld the constitutionality of Indiana’s tough ID requirement. When groups sue to block photo-ID laws in court, they can’t seem to produce real-world examples of people who have actually been denied the right to vote. According to opinion polls, over 75 percent of Americans — including majorities of Hispanics and African-Americans — routinely support such laws.

One reason is that people know you can’t function in the modern world without showing ID — you can’t cash a check, travel by plane or even train, or rent a video without being asked for one. In fact, PJ Media recently proved that you can’t even enter the Justice Department in Washington without showing a photo ID. Average voters understand that it’s only common sense to require ID because of how easy it is for people to pretend they are someone else

Filmmaker James O’Keefe demonstrated just how easy it is on Tuesday when he dispatched an assistant to the Nebraska Avenue polling place in Washington where Attorney General Holder has been registered for the last 29 years. O’Keefe specializes in the same use of hidden cameras that was pioneered by the recently deceased Mike Wallace, who used the technique to devastating effect in exposing fraud in Medicare claims and consumer products on 60 Minutes. O’Keefe’s efforts helped expose the fraud-prone voter-registration group ACORN with his video stings, and has had great success demonstrating this year in New Hampshire, Vermont, and Minnesota just how easy it is to obtain a ballot by giving the name of a dead person who is still on the rolls. Indeed, a new study by the Pew Research Center found at least 1.8 million dead people are still registered to vote. They aren’t likely to complain if someone votes in their place.

In Washington, it was child’s play for O’Keefe to beat the system. O’Keefe’s assistant used a hidden camera to document his encounter with the election worker at Holder’s polling place:

Man: “Do you have an Eric Holder, 50th Street?

Poll worker: “Let me see here.”

Man: Xxxx 50th Street.

Poll Worker: Let’s see, Holder, Hol-t-e-r, or Hold-d-e-r?

Man: H-o-l-d-e-r.

Poll Worker: D-e-r. Okay.

Man: That’s the name.

Poll Worker: I do. Xxxx 50th Street NW. Okay. [Puts check next to name, indicating someone has shown up to vote.] Will you sign there . . .

Man: I actually forgot my ID.

Poll Worker: You don’t need it; it’s all right.

Man: I left it in the car.

Poll Worker: As long as you’re in here, and you’re on our list and that’s who you say you are, we’re okay.

Man: I would feel more comfortable if I go get my ID, is it all right if I go get it?

Poll Worker: Sure, go ahead.

Man: I’ll be back faster than you can say furious!

Poll Worker: We’re not going anywhere.

Note that O’Keefe’s assistant never identified himself as Eric Holder, so he was not illegally impersonating him.

Nor did he attempt to vote using the ballot that was offered him, or even to accept it. O’Keefe has been accused by liberals of committing voter fraud in his effort to expose just how slipshod the election systems of various no-ID-required states are, but lawyers say his methods avoid that issue. Moreover, he has only taped his encounters with election officials in jurisdictions that allow videotaping someone in public with only one party’s knowledge.

As for the D.C. Board of Elections, its loose practices are a matter of record. Last year, a community activist uncovered the fact that Andrea Pringle, the new deputy chief of staff to Washington, D.C., mayor Vincent Gray, had voted illegally in the district even though she admitted to living in Maryland. She resigned in the face of the criticism.

Nor is she the only example. State Senator Harold Metts of Rhode Island got a photo-ID law put on the books in his state last year after he was told by several constituents of a pattern of voter fraud in his home town of Providence. Indeed, his own state representative and her daughter had their votes stolen by someone voting in their names in one election. “The old system was not set up to readily weed out fraud, and it would be very hard to prove,” he told the Woonsocket Patch newspaper. Metts, the state senate’s only African-American member, says that he took a lot of heat from national Democrats for getting the ID law approved by an overwhelmingly Democratic legislature. But he says party loyalty only takes him so far. “It’s time to stop crying wolf and make the voter-ID law work for those on both sides of this issue who want to ensure the integrity of the system, while guarding against disenfranchisement.”

Several of the state laws that require photo ID also make new provisions to enhance security for absentee ballots, the tool of choice for many fraudsters. Last year, Lessadolla Sowers, a member of the NAACP’s Executive Committee in Tunica County, Miss., was sentenced to five years in prison for fraudulently casting absentee ballots for ten other people. “This crime cuts against the fabric of our free society,” Judge Charles Webster said at the sentencing hearing.

Scandals such as that one helped convince 62 percent of Mississippi’s voters to approve a photo-ID law last November. The measure passed in a clear majority of counties that are majority-black. As with other ID laws, a free state-issued photo ID is available to anyone who says they can’t afford one.

But the groups opposing voter ID won’t let the facts get in their way. James Clyburn of South Carolina, the third-ranking member in the House Democratic leadership, compares voter-ID laws to “Jim Crow” provisions that blocked people from voting in the last century, and said he is “very, very anxious” that the Supreme Court “as it is presently constituted” will support the new laws. But as previously noted, the Supreme Court already has supported voter ID, with its opinion authored by its most liberal member at the time.

Some criticism of voter-ID laws has morphed into intimidation. This week, Color of Change, co-founded by former Obama special adviser Van Jones, threatened a boycott against Coca-Cola and Walmart because they financially supported the American Legislative Exchange Council, which has helped state legislators draft some of the voter-ID laws. Within hours, Coca-Cola resigned its membership in ALEC. So far Walmart is holding out by arguing that ALEC is involved with dozens of issues, many of them of direct concern to Walmart shareholders.

There is something surreal about the voter-ID issue. As James O’Keefe demonstrates, it is comically easy to commit voter fraud in person, and, unless someone confesses, it’s very difficult to ever detect. With absentee balloting, there is a paper trail that makes it easier to uncover fraud, making it a problem that even some critics of photo ID will admit.

Other than hypotheticals, there are very few cases of legitimate voters who were unable to have their vote counted because they lacked ID. People who show up without photo ID at the polls are allowed to cast a provisional ballot that is counted after proof of identity is offered.

“From voter fraud to election chicanery of all kinds, America teeters on the edge of scandal every November,” says Larry Sabato, the director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia and author of a comprehensive survey of voter fraud called “Dirty Little Secrets.” The fact that so many people want to thwart legitimate and prudent efforts to improve ballot integrity has become a scandal in its own right. Attorney General Holder is unlikely to agree with that, but after what happened at his polling place last Tuesday, he should at least understand that voter fraud itself is a scandal worth investigating.
 
I just heard Nikki Haley talk on Kudlow.

They reviewed that Obama and gang precluded South Carolina from implementing the voter ID law that they had voted for and had a discussion about it.

Governor Haley said that Obama et al said that the voter ID law would serve to suppress turnout because a lot of people couldn't afford the ID nor could they get to a government site to get one.

She made them free, no cost for the ID's and then set up a 1800 number for anyone in SC to call and get a free ride to and back from their home in order to get a free ID. They got only 23 calls.

lol. Just another democrat fairy tail.

Many don't own a TV and didn't see the PSA. Those who did couldn't call because they have no phone.

Simple!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Many don't own a TV and didn't see the PSA. Those who did couldn't call because they have no phone.

Simple!

I don't care if the government brings free photo IDs to your house. If you choose not to carry one it should not bar you from voting.

Through all these C&Ps there still has been no evidence (much less proof) of voter fraud on any kind of measurable scale. Republicans need to stop using Big Government tactics to swoop into our personal lives to fix problems that don't even exist.
 
I don't care if the government brings free photo IDs to your house. If you choose not to carry one it should not bar you from voting.

Through all these C&Ps there still has been no evidence (much less proof) of voter fraud on any kind of measurable scale. Republicans need to stop using Big Government tactics to swoop into our personal lives to fix problems that don't even exist.

hey NIGGERPOON would you say the same when they pick up welfare checks?



or

buy SUDAFED?
 
Last Saturday afternoon, in Washington, D.C., an aide to Nancy Pelosi visited the Bishop of the Catholic cathedral in D.C.
He told the Cardinal that Nancy Pelosi would be attending the next day's Mass, and he asked if the Cardinal would kindly point out Pelosi to the congregation and say a few words that would include calling Pelosi a saint.

The Cardinal replied, "No. I don't really like the woman, and there are issues of conflict with the Catholic Church over certain of Pelosi's views."

Pelosi's aide then said, "Look, I'll write a check here and now for a donation of $100,000 to your church if you'll just tell the congregation you see Pelosi as a saint."

The Cardinal thought about it and said, "Well, the church can use the money, so I'll work your request into tomorrow's sermon." As Pelosi's aide promised, Pelosi appeared for the Sunday worship and seated herself prominently at the forward left side of the center aisle.

As promised, at the start of his sermon, the Cardinal pointed out that Speaker Pelosi was present.

The Cardinal went on to explain to the congregation, "While Pelosi's presence is probably an honor to some, the woman is not numbered among my personal favorite personages. Some of her most egregious views are contrary to tenets of the Church, and she tends to flip-flop on many other issues.

Nancy Pelosi is a petty, self-absorbed hypocrite, a thumb-sucker, and a nit-wit. Nancy Pelosi is also a serial liar, a cheat, and a thief. I must say, Nancy Pelosi is the worst example of a Catholic I have ever personally witnessed.

She married for money and is using her wealth to lie to the American people. She also has a reputation for shirking her Congressional obligations both in Washington and in California. The woman is simply not to be trusted."

The Cardinal concluded, "But, when compared to President Obama, Pelosi is a saint."
 
Today, 08:36 AM
Remove user from ignore list
busybody
This message is hidden because busybody is on your ignore list.
View Post Unread Today, 08:38 AM
Remove user from ignore list
NeverEndingMe
This message is hidden because NeverEndingMe is on your ignore list.




These people are the exception. I'd say they should be forced to carry ID cards but they'd just end up trading them for a pack of Pokemon cards in the back of the short bus.

They should be microchipped.
 
Today, 08:36 AM
Remove user from ignore list
busybody
This message is hidden because busybody is on your ignore list.
View Post Unread Today, 08:38 AM
Remove user from ignore list
NeverEndingMe
This message is hidden because NeverEndingMe is on your ignore list.




These people are the exception. I'd say they should be forced to carry ID cards but they'd just end up trading them for a pack of Pokemon cards in the back of the short bus.

They should be microchipped.


are you wearing your big boy wonderrooms today? seems to me, your panties are a size too small...mooseknuckle isn't sexy
 
Back
Top