What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

[RobDownSouth]

Good for you Rob, I want you to do your very best shitting. You're well known on the board for attacking families of members who disagree with you.

I know you have your band wagon children who like to masturbate while making foolish remarks about KK.

Let's get this straight, I have no problem with Karen Kraft, I have no intentions of jumping on your puppet band wagon.

Karen, if you're reading this.... I'll see you on the boards.

LOL...yeah, you were egging "Karen" on against me, just like a good toady beta male. Now that "Karen" has basically no credibility here whatsoever, he relies on weak effeminate men such as yourself to help rebuild his image.

Whether you choose to admit it to yourself of not, you condoned and encouraged "Karen"'s attacks on my kids.

...and now you're trying to re-frame this as a "you don't like....I don't like..." disagreement.

No.

I'm not buying it.

One hundred and seven people went on record saying it was wrong of miles and "Karen" to publish personal information about me, my kids, my siblings' kids and my in-laws.

You were one of less that five people who stood behind your beloved "Karen" because you liked "her", toadying favor with "her".

This is NOT 'he said/"she" said', shitcan. This is basic "right" vs. "wrong".

So please, take your holier-than-thou sanctimony...
shine it up really good...
turn it sideways...
and stick it up your ass.

I'll pray for your children.

 

[koalabear]

LOL...yeah, you were egging "Karen" on against me, just like a good toady beta male. Now that "Karen" has basically no credibility here whatsoever, he relies on weak effeminate men such as yourself to help rebuild his image.

Whether you choose to admit it to yourself of not, you condoned and encouraged "Karen"'s attacks on my kids.

...and now you're trying to re-frame this as a "you don't like....I don't like..." disagreement.

No.

I'm not buying it.

One hundred and seven people went on record saying it was wrong of miles and "Karen" to publish personal information about me, my kids, my siblings' kids and my in-laws.

You were one of less that five people who stood behind your beloved "Karen" because you liked "her", toadying favor with "her".

This is NOT 'he said/"she" said', shitcan. This is basic "right" vs. "wrong".

So please, take your holier-than-thou sanctimony...
shine it up really good...
turn it sideways...
and stick it up your ass.

I'll pray for your children.

Best pray for your own, maggot.

 

[mercury14]

How are they not banned?

 

[RobDownSouth]

Best pray for your own, maggot.

You beta males have to stick together.

 

[mercury14]

You beta males have to stick together.

http://www.fishlore.com/Pictures/Profiles/bluered-betta-lg.jpg

 

[Sean Renaud]

That's a bitchin fish.

 

[mercury14]

http://www.betta.asia/betta%20blue.jpg

 

[bra_man69]

The fish are best part of this thread

 

[garbage can]

The fish are best part of this thread

*grin*...You're right, we need to get back to gloom and doom stuff...

 

[garbage can]

LOL...yeah, you were egging "Karen" on against me, just like a good toady beta male. Now that "Karen" has basically no credibility here whatsoever, he relies on weak effeminate men such as yourself to help rebuild his image.

Whether you choose to admit it to yourself of not, you condoned and encouraged "Karen"'s attacks on my kids.

...and now you're trying to re-frame this as a "you don't like....I don't like..." disagreement.

No.

I'm not buying it.

One hundred and seven people went on record saying it was wrong of miles and "Karen" to publish personal information about me, my kids, my siblings' kids and my in-laws.

You were one of less that five people who stood behind your beloved "Karen" because you liked "her", toadying favor with "her".

This is NOT 'he said/"she" said', shitcan. This is basic "right" vs. "wrong".

So please, take your holier-than-thou sanctimony...
shine it up really good...
turn it sideways...
and stick it up your ass.

I'll pray for your children.

Reread your post and tell me you weren't hallucinating....

 

[bra_man69]

*grin*...You're right, we need to get back to gloom and doom stuff...

NA fishes are much better
Plus dumbassdownsouth a idiot crying after he give out it's personal information.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

*grin*...You're right, we need to get back to gloom and doom stuff...

Go ahead GC,tell us how bad the economy is... How President Obama's party economic policies nearly destroyed our economy, how he failed to capture Bin Laden, and allowed a terrorist attack that he was warned about to come to fruition, and got us into two arguably unnecessary wars... Wait, that was his predecessor.

 

[koalabear]

MOTroll slobber aisle 5!

 

[richard_daily]

Go ahead GC,tell us how bad the economy is... How President Obama's party economic policies nearly destroyed our economy, how he failed to capture Bin Laden, and allowed a terrorist attack that he was warned about to come to fruition, and got us into two arguably unnecessary wars... Wait, that was his predecessor.

You're not allowed to bring up previous presidents in a negative light... unless it's Clinton or Carter... then it's ok.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Go ahead GC,tell us how bad the economy is... How President Obama's party economic policies nearly destroyed our economy, how he failed to capture Bin Laden, and allowed a terrorist attack that he was warned about to come to fruition, and got us into two arguably unnecessary wars... Wait, that was his predecessor.

The economy and President Obama are currently enjoying the fruits of all his unpatriotic, I know, how DARE I say that,

The problem is, is that the way Bush has done it over the last eight years is to take out a credit card from the Bank of China in the name of our children, driving up our national debt from $5 trillion for the first 42 presidents - #43 added $4 trillion by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion of debt that we are going to have to pay back -- $30,000 for every man, woman and child. That's irresponsible. It's unpatriotic.
Barack Hussein Obama

spending and that is the worst recovery in our history with a jobless expansion that barely exceeds the rate of natural population growth. Oh, wait, I think I got that wrong, let us let an expert correct me.

If you ask me, I think what we're experiencing isn't in fact closer to a "growthless" recovery than to a jobless one. Because GDP started to grow more than a year and a half ago, but with the exception of just a couple of quarters, growth has not been noticeably above its trend rate of about 2-1/2 percent a year. I don't rejoice at the news that we added 216,000 jobs in March. About a hundred thousand of that 216,000 is needed every month just to keep up with the growth in the labor force. At this rate of job growth, it would take most of the decade to replace the eight 8-1/2 million jobs that were lost in the recession.
Christina Romer
Chairwoman of Obama's White House Council of Economic Advisors

Now, let's blame Bush and the 2007 REPUBLICAN Congress for creating the housing bubble and toxic derivatives...



Because Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter and the Democrats had nothing to do with it.

I am happily going to vote for Obama because ya'll love this economy so much that I think you deserve another four years of it.

As ya'll say when you celebrate the rise of your portfolios, I have mine, what the fuck do I care about what happens to anybody else.

 

[unregistered]

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

From the WSJ

The current recovery began in the second half of 2009, but economic growth has been weak. Growth in 2010 was 3% and in 2011 it was 1.7%. Who knows what 2012 will bring, but the current growth rate looks to be about 2%, according to the consensus of economists recently polled by Blue Chip Economic Indicators. Sadly, we have never really recovered from the recession. The economy has not even returned to its long-term growth rate and is certainly not making up for lost ground. No doubt, there are favorable economic numbers to be found, but overall we continue to struggle.

During the postwar period up to the current recession (1947-2007), the average annual growth rate for the U.S. was 3.4%. The last three decades have experienced somewhat slower growth than the earlier periods, but even in the period 1977-2007, the average growth rate was 3%. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the recovery began in the second half of 2009. Since that time, the economy has grown at 2.4%, below our long-term trend by either measure. At this point, the economy is 12% smaller than it would have been had we stayed on trend growth since 2007.

Worse, the gap is growing over time. Today, the economy is four percentage points further from the trend line than it was the first quarter of 2009 when this administration's nearly $900 billion fiscal stimulus efforts began. If forecasts of around 2% growth turn out to be accurate, we will add to that gap this year.

Contrast this weak growth with the recovery that followed the other large recession of recent decades. In the early 1980s, the economy experienced a double-dip recession, with contractions in both 1980 and '82. But growth rates in the subsequent two years averaged almost 6%. The high growth that persisted throughout the 1980s brought the economy quickly back to the trend line. Unlike the current period, from 1983 on, the economy was in rapid catch-up mode and eventually regained all that had been lost during the early '80s.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog...onomic_recovery_in_history.html#ixzz1r4OwwJ1p

 

[unregistered]

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Their idea of up is level.


We know that's what Obama wants; he thinks that with redistribution, social justice and fairness he can eliminate the business cycle. He sees no downturn on the horizon, and if there were, it would simply be another crises to take advantage of while placing the blame squarely on the Republican House and the Obstruction in the Senate that prevents his budgets from being enacted.

 

[unregistered]

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

So...

Is this a negative economic indicator?

U.S. stock-index futures sold off on Wednesday as traders grew more nervous about the debt situation in the eurozone and less confident that the Fed will take on another round of asset purchases.

Fox Business

Or nothing of any great import?

 

[richard_daily]

FDR, LBJ, and Lincoln serve as well.

Yeah, but other than you, no one on this board was alive when Lincoln was serving.

And yeah... he freed the slaves, so I can see how that would chaff your hide.

 

[richard_daily]

Their idea of up is level.


We know that's what Obama wants; he thinks that with redistribution, social justice and fairness he can eliminate the business cycle. He sees no downturn on the horizon, and if there were, it would simply be another crises to take advantage of while placing the blame squarely on the Republican House and the Obstruction in the Senate that prevents his budgets from being enacted.

This is just a new level of stupid... even for you.

No surprise that veteman cuddled up next to you on it and rubbed his stench against you.

 

[RobDownSouth]

So...

Is this a negative economic indicator?


Fox Business

Or nothing of any great import?

A single data point is not a "negative economic indicator", despite your best efforts to portray one as such.

A quick look at stock market futures for the past quarter shows that the index has gradually increased in price from 1253 to 1397, a gain of 11.5%.

LINK

To answer your second question, virtually nothing that comes out of your mouth is of great import.

 

[koalabear]

Stocks fall as eurozone fears flare up
A Spanish bond auction draws tepid interest. American companies add more jobs than forecast. JPMorgan may be sued for actions related to Lehman's collapse.


Updated: 04/04/2012 10:04 ET
DOW 13,083.57 -115.98