Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah. April. 15 commercial airline crashes happened in April. `course, Wapner was born in April...
Yeah. April. 15 commercial airline crashes happened in April. `course, Wapner was born in April...
The rate of autism among American children has nearly doubled over the past decade, according to a new report released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), jumping from about one in 150 children back in 2000 to about one in 88 children in 2008, which is the last time official estimates were calculated. And interestingly, this steady rise in autism rates coincides directly with CDC-endorsed vaccination schedules that have also risen sharply since the 1980s.
Back in 1983, for example, the CDC recommended only ten vaccines for children from birth through six years old (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/images/schedule1983s.jpg). Today, that number has risen significantly to 29 vaccines and counting, many of which are now administered all at one time or in combinations like the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine (http://www.cdc.gov).
And yet the mainstream medical system and its allies in the government and media are willfully ignoring this glaring fact, blaming “unknown” causes and “genetics” for causing autism, which are the two most common catch-all scapegoats. And in explaining the drastic rise in autism rates over the years, the talking heads actually claim that there is no rise — the seemingly elevated autism rates are merely the result of improved autism screening methods that are now identifying more cases.
http://www.infowars.com/78-percent-...ade-coincides-with-new-vaccination-schedules/
So you're saying correlation equals causation.
I'm pretty sure I said reading your sh!t is hell on earth...
God forbid you should be held accountable for your quackery.
Some higher power is going to have to give a quack like you a hellacious raise...
...before you can even begin to learn about holding me accountable, bozo.
The BMJ should have declared competing interests in relation to this editorial by Fiona Godlee and colleagues (BMJ 2011;342:c7452, doi:10.1136/bmj.c7452). The BMJ Group receives advertising and sponsorship revenue from vaccine manufacturers, and specifically from Merck and GSK, which both manufacture MMR vaccines. For further information see the rapid response from Godlee (www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.d1335.full/reply#bmj_el_251470). The same omission also affected two related Editor’s Choice articles (BMJ 2011;342:d22 and BMJ 2011;342:d378).
Do you think vaccines are causing autism?
Or that communism killed the Roanoke settlers!Nah...
...that'd be like thinking flu vaccines actually cause flu.
What idiot would think something so foolish as that?
Or that communism killed the Roanoke settlers!
This article has a correction
Please see: Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent
If you walk like a duck, quack...
The Lancet retracts Andrew Wakefield’s article
Published by Steven Novella under Science and Medicine
Comments: 29
In 1998 Andrew Wakefield and 11 other co-authors published a study with the unremarkable title: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Such a title would hardly grab a science journalist’s attention, but the small study sparked widespread hysteria about a possible connection between the mumps-measles-rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
The study itself has not stood the test of time. The results could not be replicated by other labs. A decade of subsequent research has sufficiently cleared the MMR vaccine of any connection to ASD. The lab used to search for measles virus in the guts of the study subjects has been shown to have used flawed techniques, resulting in false positives (from the Autism Omnibus testimony, and here is a quick summary). There does not appear to be any association between autism and a GI disorder.
But it’s OK to be wrong in science. There is no expectation that every potential finding will turn out to be true – in fact it is expected that most new finding will eventually be found to be false. That’s the nature of investigating the unknown. No harm no foul.
Andrew Wakefield, however, was apparently guilty of more than just getting it wrong, or even of being a sloppy scientist. He has been the subject of an ethics investigation by the General Medical Council who recently concluded that:
The General Medical Council ruled he had acted “dishonestly and irresponsibly” in doing his research.
It came from some idiot on the internet.Dr. Quack Mcmercury has you scheduled for Thursday...
...when he'll probe you rectally to ascertain where that delusion sprouts from.
Or that communism killed the Roanoke settlers!
A pretzel!