Justice for Trayvon??

Ahhh, the squawking continues. Hopefully tomorrow will bring some new let's-drag-this-out-some-more speculations, distraction memes, irrelevant blurt posts and C&P'd opinions to keep this thread alive. The racist shitstain can't be expected to do it all by himself with his n-word droppings and Obama finger fetish photos, after all.
 
Ahhh, the squawking continues. Hopefully tomorrow will bring some new let's-drag-this-out-some-more speculations, distraction memes, irrelevant blurt posts and C&P'd opinions to keep this thread alive. The racist shitstain can't be expected to do it all by himself with his n-word droppings and Obama finger fetish photos, after all.

N word what nearly are neat maybe naturally
O you mean nigger
So you let a word get to you?
Nigger
Nigger
Nigger
 
Ahhh, the squawking continues. Hopefully tomorrow will bring some new let's-drag-this-out-some-more speculations, distraction memes, irrelevant blurt posts and C&P'd opinions to keep this thread alive. The racist shitstain can't be expected to do it all by himself with his n-word droppings and Obama finger fetish photos, after all.

Rob is a maggot, we know.
 
N word what nearly are neat maybe naturally
O you mean nigger
So you let a word get to you?
Nigger
Nigger
Nigger

If it were just a regular word with no meaning, then none of you five-watt lightbulbs would be using it. In your case, it's probably one of ten english words you can actually spell correctly, much less use in a coherent sentence.

Continue squawking. It's all you got.
 
If it were just a regular word with no meaning, then none of you five-watt lightbulbs would be using it. In your case, it's probably one of ten english words you can actually spell correctly, much less use in a coherent sentence.

Continue squawking. It's all you got.

Your the one that gives it a meaning.
No other person can tell you how to think.
nigger nigger nigger
 
Your the one that gives it a meaning.
No other person can tell you how to think.
nigger nigger nigger

It already has a meaning. That's why you're using it.

Me pulling your card on what you really are due to the words you choose to use to represent your mind and soul is not you telling me how to think. And I was thinking for myself long before you learned how to write, apparently.

Continue squawking. It's all you got.
 
Does justice for Trayvon include his family [potentially] getting millions in compensation from the homeowners association insurance?
Because I heard a report today that the lawyer for the family is considering civil action against the gated community where this took place.
 
When did Republicans become part of the Liberal Minority?

With Teddy Roosevelt, Herbert Hoover, and Wendell Wilkie. Wait! It was Lincoln. Nelson Rockefeller?

The GOP is full of Perfumed Princes who sell elephants but prefer donkeys for their personal transportation.
 
Does justice for Trayvon include his family [potentially] getting millions in compensation from the homeowners association insurance?
Because I heard a report today that the lawyer for the family is considering civil action against the gated community where this took place.

I've read that as well. Very hard to believe the family wouldn't sue.
 
The original pictures posted of Treyvon Martin from a few years ago portray a young man that the President said "Could be my son". I interpret that to mean he thought that Treyvon was a young man with potential and a bright future in front of him.

Instead, over the period of just a few years, he went from that angel-faced young boy to a kid who'd been skipping school and was suspended from school three times, at least once for having drug paraphanalia.

What happened over those few years to cause such a big change? The tragedy here is how a kid with so much promise ended up the way he did. What can be done to help prevent this sort of thing from happening in the future? ....we can't waste the youth of our country like this.

Keep in mind that I'm an unapolgetic Republican and don't see the "solution" as being a new government program that costs billions , rather, I'd like to see stronger outreach and leadership in support of our teenagers. I hope that President Obama decides this is an area that deserves his attention when he finds more free time on his hands after next January.

I know this post is old, but hopefully you've already figured out that the post and pics they used were not of the right Trayvon Martin. They were of a different child. Also, he wasn't caught with drugs and never punished for it. An empty dime-bag was found in his possession, but the school couldn't confirm if there was ever any drugs in it.

And about your post on black-black crime and why there isn't any national outrage...Well maybe not for non-black Americans, but I guarantee you that if you go to any "black" community there is "outcry" to end violence in those neighborhoods. There was a huge movement in the late 80s and 90s during the height of the gang wars. Communities all over the country expressed how they felt and wanted those crimes expelled in their communities.

But none of that has anything to do with the topic, off track completely. This case has much more to do with the police departments inability to correctly perform their duties protecting and serving their community. No processing was done at all for this case. That is what the outcry is really about. Some people (a small group) are distorting this into a story only about race. Are there elements of race involved? Sure, but the greater issue is that the proper procedures for dealing with this event weren't met. And now, unfortunately it's become a 3 ring circus.

None of this would have reached this level if the case had been dealt with within the week it happened. Not a peep. Guarantee it.
 
Last edited:
It already has a meaning. That's why you're using it.

Me pulling your card on what you really are due to the words you choose to use to represent your mind and soul is not you telling me how to think. And I was thinking for myself long before you learned how to write, apparently.

Continue squawking. It's all you got.

Hey LAWN JOCKEY

I honer T MART, the LATE T MART:D by calling him what HE called HIMSELF on TWITTER NIGGA whats teh problem LAWN JOCKEY?


I wanna see your BP explode the KNEE GROID head of yours

TIPPY!:cattail:
 
Hey LAWN JOCKEY

I honer T MART, the LATE T MART:D by calling him what HE called HIMSELF on TWITTER NIGGA whats teh problem LAWN JOCKEY?


I wanna see your BP explode the KNEE GROID head of yours

TIPPY!:cattail:

Tee Hee, LAWN JOCKEY, Knowing how you luv sphelink n stuff, I even mosplet HONER in your HONOR

TEE HEE NIGGER:D
 
Your attention all NIGGER, you wont, you should,

READ THIS



Yes, B:OATED BITCH you especially



Trayvon Martin - Is Everything You Think You Know Just Media BS?



As a launch point, let me pick up on this throw-away comment made by Rod Dreher in his own comments section:

I do think Zimmerman was a paranoid guy — I make this judgment based on his frequent 911 calls over the past year — but that doesn’t make him a murderer.

I can't establish the full context for that remark, but on March 20 Mr. Dreher wrote this:

The Orlando Sentinel reports that in the 13 months prior to the shooting, Zimmerman called 911 an astonishing 46 times.

And I have no doubt they did. But that was a widely circulated typo - per the City of Sanford website, Zimmerman nade those 46 calls from January 2004 to the present, not January 2011. Even NPR got this right, eventually, and I have seen appropriate updates by Ta Nehesi Coates at the Atlantic, and elsewhere.

But one could easily blink and miss it, so Mr. Dreher might well be continuing to pin the 'paranoid' label onto Zimmerman based on misreported and widely uncorrected information.

For example, the NY Times - the Paper of Record! - has noted those 46 calls twice. First was their big kick-off coverage by Ms. Alvarez on March 16:

Mr. Zimmerman lives in the predominantly white gated community where the shooting took place. A criminal justice major in college, he often patrolled the streets in his car. In the last 14 months, Mr. Zimmerman had made 46 calls to the police, officials said, reporting everything from alarms and disturbances to reckless driving and, most commonly, a “suspicious” person.

And Ms. Alvarez again on March 20:

Mr. Zimmerman had reported a “suspicious” person to 911 shortly before the encounter, saying a black male was checking out the houses and staring at him. Mr. Zimmerman, a criminal justice major, often patrolled the neighborhood. He had placed 46 calls to 911 in 14 months, for reports including open windows and suspicious people.

Does anyone notice a "Correction Appended" to either of those stories? There they sit in the Times archives, forever commemorating media misinformation.

However! The Times did a big calm-down walk-back today where they painstakingly reviewed the evidence. Zimmerman's life back to grade school was reprised. Surely they quietly fixed the error there, as they did with Zimmerman's weight (now reported as 170 lbs, down from the widely cited 240)?

If they did, I can't find it. Which is to say, neither "46" nor "forty-six" is showing up in a search. The closest they come is this subtle allusion:

Police records over the last several years suggest a man who was quite familiar with 911 dispatchers; who seemed, somehow, to be always in the middle of things. In October 2003, for example, on perhaps his greatest day in civic vigilance, Mr. Zimmerman chased after and assisted in the capture of a man who had stolen two 13-inch TV/DVD players from an Albertsons.

Pretty subtle! Would Mr. Dreher, or any other previously misinformed Times reader, realize that this meant the 46 calls were over eight years, not the previously reported fourteen months? Or would they grin knowingly and say "Familiar indeed - 46 calls in fourteen months familiar. Paranoid much?".

To be fair, I am not even sure the Times editors themselves are aware of the level of BS they have been propagating. If their goal is to correct the record and report a bit more responsibly going forward, maybe we will see those corrections appended in the next few days. I should provide a link to the NY Times Public Apologist for anyone who wants to waste their breath.

In the meantime, I welcome other examples of egregious misreporting that have gone quietly uncorrected. A personal fave was the lefty buzzpoint that the Sanford police never took Zimmerman's gun. Even Mother Jones blew the whistle on that, eventually. Others?
 
Speaking of myths

Why do you believe T Marts lawyer about

Skittles n tea?????????????

Im surprised he didnt say T Mart just bought apple pie to bring to his Mother


I know

Lets attack the white guy...........cause we know all about him........right?
 
Does justice for Trayvon include his family [potentially] getting millions in compensation from the homeowners association insurance?
Because I heard a report today that the lawyer for the family is considering civil action against the gated community where this took place.

More media shock words.


Since when does an apartment complex mean "gated community?"

It's the same think as the claim that Travon was shot by a white guy; we're supposed to thing DUKE LaCROSSE, privileged white people killing blacks because they hate them...

Trust me, the law suit ain't going anywhere...
 
I KNOW!




Let's doctor the tapes! Throb&Friends will believe the story is true, even if the tape is a forgery!

:cool:
 
Back
Top