Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hi, I'm new here, but I've noticed you seem dumb.
"Boy."
And yet you've already determined that Zimmerman is guilty.![]()
I know a lot of people consider 17 an adult, but I have a 17 year old nephew, and he is most definitely not, an adult.
And, he would most likely act the same way Trayvon did in this situation.
... Tackle Zimmerman and punch him in the nose for following him?
So Martin had no right to "stand his ground"?
... Tackle Zimmerman and punch him in the nose for following him?
I know a lot of people consider 17 an adult, but I have a 17 year old nephew, and he is most definitely not, an adult.
And, he would most likely act the same way Trayvon did in this situation.
See what I mean? You don't have the facts, yet you've determined that Zimmerman acted illegally, and that Martin is innocent. How do you know what happened just prior to the shooting?
See what I mean? You don't have the facts, yet you've determined that Zimmerman acted illegally, and that Martin is innocent. How do you know what happened just prior to the shooting?
What, do you think Trayvon was doing, that deserved being followed, at night, by a strange man with a gun?
What, do you think Trayvon was doing, that deserved being followed, at night, by a strange man with a gun?
That's the question you don't know the answer to, and I have no clue either. This is why you cannot judge who is right and who is wrong. Could be reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, we don't know. You don't know.
That's the question you don't know the answer to, and I have no clue either. This is why you cannot judge who is right and who is wrong. Could be reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, we don't know. You don't know.
That's the question you don't know the answer to, and I have no clue either. This is why you cannot judge who is right and who is wrong. Could be reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, we don't know. You don't know.
Once Zimmerman CONTINUED to follow Trayvon after being told to STOP, Zimmerman was engaged in an illegal activity: countermanning an official order is a crime, or it is in NY, not sure if in Wild West Florida.
There is where you are wrong. The dispatcher did not issue a lawful order. Zimmerman had the same right to walk the streets as Trayvon. Even if it was a lawful order it has nothing to do with the final act. Even if (as I suspect, but as yet there is no evidence released that says one way or the other) Zimmerman put his hands on Trayvon first, it does not remove Zimmermans right to protect his life.
There is where you are wrong. The dispatcher did not issue a lawful order. Zimmerman had the same right to walk the streets as Trayvon. Even if it was a lawful order it has nothing to do with the final act. Even if (as I suspect, but as yet there is no evidence released that says one way or the other) Zimmerman put his hands on Trayvon first, it does not remove Zimmermans right to protect his life.