badbabysitter
Vault Girl
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2002
- Posts
- 19,179
No, Trayvon's backpack was looked into after he was caught at school defacing property. It contained a burglary tool plus 12 items of women's jewelry.
Obviously, the point is what sort of a kid Trayvon was. Media outlets initially portrayed him as an innocent lamb, running a photo taken 5 years ago as if it were a current photo.
Inasmuch as the case is being adjudicated in the mass media, it becomes legitimate to inquire into Zimmerman's background, which isn't spotless either.
But nobody forced Trayvon to twitter under the name "NO-LIMIT-NIGGA." Nobody forced him to have a burglary tool and items of women's jewelry in his backpack.
Although Zimmerman clearly exceeded his Neighborhood Watch mandate, it begins to look like Trayvon was precisely the sort of burglar which a Neighborhood Watch volunteer should be alert for.
Sadly, in the instant case, the outcome was tragic.
so you're saying because he was caught at school defacing property.. he was obviously commiting a criminal act the night he was shot?
and because he may have stolen some jewelery before.. ( which you somehow neglect to mention was never identified).. that justifies him being shot?
and because he chose to twitter under a name that offends you.... that also justifies him being shot?
and since none of the break-in equipment was on him the night he was shot.. it still justifies him being shot?