The SCOTUS Looks At Obama Care

[unregistered]

 

[garbage can]

It might be a long day:


https://p.twimg.com/AosOcNPCQAAwrGR.jpg:large

Seems perfectly reasonable to me...

 

[koalabear]

Where's Boardwalk and Park Place?

 

[unregistered]

 

[Peregrinator]

I think in the interest of accuracy we should start referring to it as ORomneybamacare.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I wonder if Vetty ...or any of his Teahadist brethren... would give up his social security check if he saw a flowchart of how complex social security was?

 

[koalabear]

I think in the interest of accuracy we should start referring to it as ORomneybamacare.

Says the "I'm not a lib".

 

[garbage can]

The organizational flow is quite clear and orderly to anyone familiar with Rube Goldberg.

*Laughing*...I'll bet 85% of the peeps on this forum do not know who Rube Goldberg is....

 

[Liar]

I think in the interest of accuracy we should start referring to it as ORomneybamacare.

Obronmeycare.

Official mascot, the brony.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Obronmeycare.

Official mascot, the brony.

Fuck you. We'll not be tied to this!

 

[Liar]

How did that flowchart look pre Obamacare?

[you] -------> [freedom and bald eagles] -------> [doctor]

Myeah. Totally.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Last nite I found a 1940 Mencken quote about Wendell Wilkie and it made me think of Romneys impending loss to Owebama: IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BEAT A DEMAGOGUE WHEN YOU SWALLOW FOUR FIFTHS OF HIS BUNCOMBE, AND THEN TRY TO ALARM THE BOOBS WITH THE LITTLE THAT IS LEFT.

Further in the article Mencken opines that Wilkie's entire campaign platform boiled down to: I CAN DO FDR's AGENDA BETTER THAN FDR CAN.

Thats Romney.

 

[Liar]

Fuck you. We'll not be tied to this!

Derpy, is that you?

 

[Sean Renaud]

Derpy, is that you?

No. I'm the Doctor.

http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111026145853/mlpfanart/images/thumb/3/37/Dr_whooves_backing_up_s01e12.png/352px-Dr_whooves_backing_up_s01e12.png

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean Renaud]

Quoting him is a good way to illustrate his problem. There is no real comparison between Romney's perfectly constitutional but stupid plan in Massachusetts, and Obama's clearly unconstitutional and all encompassing stupid federal plan.

Except how terribly similar they are in every way.

The only question being if demanding we buy something is legal.

 

[TexasWife25]

Quoting him is a good way to illustrate his problem. There is no real comparison between Romney's perfectly constitutional but stupid plan in Massachusetts, and Obama's clearly unconstitutional and all encompassing stupid federal plan.

What do you see as the "big important difference" that makes Obama's plan so horrible compared to Romneys. Besides the fact that Romneys was paid for by the federal government and Obama had to actual try to fund his.

 

[Disgustipated]

Quoting him is a good way to illustrate his problem. There is no real comparison between Romney's perfectly constitutional but stupid plan in Massachusetts, and Obama's clearly unconstitutional and all encompassing stupid federal plan.

You really are a dumbfuck. The plans are almost identical.

 

[phrodeau]

With one minor exception, the people are demanding change that Obama is incapable by ideology of providing. I think he's done, lies and all.

That means zilch to the Supreme Court. They don't read polls.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean Renaud]

Not that the polls have Obama actually being unpopular. Even Fox News has him within the Margin of Error with it being 45/47 against him.

 

[unregistered]

 

[Sean Renaud]

Wanna bet the SCOTUS thinks it's Constitutional?

 

[unregistered]