Gunmaker invents chilling double-barrel handgun

Oh,& The Eathan Allen Pepperbox above

Strikes a cord with me cause my Grandmas maiden was Allen.Colt took the long barrels from the pepperbox & cut 2 to 4 cylinders for the modern day revolver,& started the assembly line mfg technique,which was later in turn adopted by the modern factories like Ford cars...

& for the lord steve dude,I said what I had to say,ie,didn t care for it ,right off.

Another thing I don t care for /& this isn t your personal reply steve, is the military wasting money.The Mid 70s M 16 was 175 bucks.Today 1500.Ammo doubled in the past 3 yrs

Say for 250 bucks each,they could buy 100 000 tech 9s,shoulder sling them like German grease guns from WW2 stormtroops,they d shoot 9MM pistol ammo at 10 to 15 bucks a box of 50...
 
Last edited:
think of all those poor rednecks who are going to buy this and smack themselves in the face w/ the recoil! :( ban 'em all, i say. think of the manchildren.



what the hell are you trying to say

I have no idea why...but when I imagine you in real life, I imagine you smell really bad. Weird huh?
 
Youtube...

Get ready to enjoy some youtube vids with skinny white boys clocking themselves with this gun in the face after they fire off two .45 rounds at once.

Granted this thing is prob pretty darn heavy.
 
Get ready to enjoy some youtube vids with skinny white boys clocking themselves with this gun in the face after they fire off two .45 rounds at once.

Granted this thing is prob pretty darn heavy.

yeah but 1911 metal frames never mitigate recoil as much as it seems like they should and it must be hard as hell to get a good high grip on this thing unless you have monster hands.
 
yeah but 1911 metal frames never mitigate recoil as much as it seems like they should and it must be hard as hell to get a good high grip on this thing unless you have monster hands.

My Kimber Pro Carry has less recoil than most 9mm's, it's all in the design. ;)
 
yeah but 1911 metal frames never mitigate recoil as much as it seems like they should and it must be hard as hell to get a good high grip on this thing unless you have monster hands.

Springs dictate felt recoil, not the frame.
 
Springs dictate felt recoil, not the frame.

to some extent, but not entirely. a heavier/longer barrel will reduce muzzle flip and the laws of physics dictate that a more massive gun is simply moved less by recoil energies.

the fact that an 8" barrel colt python recoils less than a titanium frame taurus 651 or whatever doesn't have anything to do with springs, and those same principles carry over to semi-autos
 
Strikes a cord with me cause my Grandmas maiden was Allen.Colt took the long barrels from the pepperbox & cut 2 to 4 cylinders for the modern day revolver,& started the assembly line mfg technique,which was later in turn adopted by the modern factories like Ford cars...

& for the lord steve dude,I said what I had to say,ie,didn t care for it ,right off.

Another thing I don t care for /& this isn t your personal reply steve, is the military wasting money.The Mid 70s M 16 was 175 bucks.Today 1500.Ammo doubled in the past 3 yrs

Say for 250 bucks each,they could buy 100 000 tech 9s,shoulder sling them like German grease guns from WW2 stormtroops,they d shoot 9MM pistol ammo at 10 to 15 bucks a box of 50...

WHAT THE HECK DUDE

are you having a seizure?
 
to some extent, but not entirely. a heavier/longer barrel will reduce muzzle flip and the laws of physics dictate that a more massive gun is simply moved less by recoil energies.

the fact that an 8" barrel colt python recoils less than a titanium frame taurus 651 or whatever doesn't have anything to do with springs, and those same principles carry over to semi-autos

Apples and oranges. A revolver is not an semi-auto, The reason they can use light alloys these days is because of the recoil springs.
 
Load it with bird shot and it will make a great snake gun. If you're the type of idiot who feels a need to shoot at snakes.
 
Back
Top