Breitbart and Limbaugh in one week...

Queen, I suspect you've never listened to Limbaugh.

I'm guessing you get your talking points from MSNBC

Yes, I've listened to Rush.

Also, I get my talking points from my own brain. Sometimes it's difficult, I will admit, to clear the estrogen outta the way but, it's doable.
 
Who has ever called his show news or information? It's a syndicated radio talk show. It's entertainment.

When you got to a comedy, do you walk out complaing that it wasn't a documentary?

Colbert and Stewart have pulpits as well. Their Comedy is persuasive and informative and entertaining. Rush paints in another part of the crib. I'm not afraid of the fervent noise voters are making over this and these and them and any others. People are entertained politically differently. This isn't Homs. You don't need to clean the bathroom.
 
Garbage Can

Right Field

AJ

Vetteman

Ishmael

Koala Bear

Every dumbass on this board cites his nonsense as fact.
Nothing you quoted was in the form of anything that even imparts fact by mistake. There is not a single item there confusable as data. It's opinion, wrapped in one-liner jokes. People like him not because he's right or informed, but because he's good.

I find the content reprehensible. I find the jokes masterful. Give him credit for being good at his job and stop being so fragile about the mean old radio man.
 
Colbert and Stewart have pulpits as well. Their Comedy is persuasive and informative and entertaining. Rush paints in another part of the crib. I'm not afraid of the fervent noise voters are making over this and these and them and any others. People are entertained politically differently. This isn't Homs. You don't need to clean the bathroom.
I'm pretty sure you're agreeing with me, and if so, I wish to commend you on your keen sense of judgment and taste.
 
*laughing*... I think left wing radio has Ed Shultz as its only representative.

And he believes all tea partiers are racist.

I don't think that most lefties listen to radio any more then I do...

We have podcasts rather then "radio".
 
Nothing you quoted was in the form of anything that even imparts fact by mistake. There is not a single item there confusable as data. It's opinion, wrapped in one-liner jokes. People like him not because he's right or informed, but because he's good.

I find the content reprehensible. I find the jokes masterful. Give him credit for being good at his job and stop being so fragile about the mean old radio man.

Calling a woman a slut is masterful? This is what I get sick of. When assholes like Breitbart and Rush win kudos for being "good" or "edgy" because they shamelessly engage in racism and misogyny. No. They are assholes willing to stoop to any level for attention. It's like saying the guy who bites off the heads of chickens at the carnival is "good" because he's so bold and edgy and people watch his show. What's next? Claiming bloody, dismembering car accidents are "good" because people slow down to look?
 
While I do not agree with Limbaugh's choice of words, I do indeed see his point. I mean, seriously, why do so many people expect everyone else to fund $3,000 per year per college students' sexual activities? Last time I checked, condoms were pretty fucking cheap. It is an individual choice, why should everyone else suffer the consequences of their actions?
 
In high school, coke bunnies (or coke whores) were girls that would have sex with a guy if the guy gave them cocaine. An exchange of sex for a product. Or thought of as another way, an incentive for the girl to have sex.

Flash forward to the College woman going to an ivy league school @ 24K per semester. Rush called her a slut (uncalled for). But using the same definition of what we used in high school, she would be a pill bunny, or pill whore. She claimed that in order to have sex, she needs the BC pills that someone, other than herself, had to supply.

So Rush deserves the drubbing because he knew better, but the woman is what she is.

'nuff said.
 
Calling a woman a slut is masterful? This is what I get sick of. When assholes like Breitbart and Rush win kudos for being "good" or "edgy" because they shamelessly engage in racism and misogyny. No. They are assholes willing to stoop to any level for attention. It's like saying the guy who bites off the heads of chickens at the carnival is "good" because he's so bold and edgy and people watch his show. What's next? Claiming bloody, dismembering car accidents are "good" because people slow down to look?

Okay, so Breitbart and Rush are assholes. I agree with you there. After all, this is what they do for a living. However, you seem perfectly fine with the idea of helping contribute $3,000 per year, per college woman student for their sexual activities? And none of that even remotely related to the level of education many adults can not even hope to afford?
 
Last edited:
Okay, so Breitbart and Rush are assholes. I agree with you there. After all, this is what they do for a living. However, you seem perfectly fine with the idea of helping contribute $3,000 per year, per college student for their sexual activities? And none of that even remotely related to the level of education many adults can not even hope to afford?

You say "sexual activities" like it is a bad thing. Sexual activity is a part of a healthy lifestyle. Birth control is a part of health services. Do you oppose heath services for athletes? Why should you pay for health services for some guy who wants to play ball and gets injured.

I'm not some hypocritical puritan with a punishment fetish. Apparently you are.
 
You say "sexual activities" like it is a bad thing. Sexual activity is a part of a healthy lifestyle. Birth control is a part of health services. Do you oppose heath services for athletes? Why should you pay for health services for some guy who wants to play ball and gets injured.

I'm not some hypocritical puritan with a punishment fetish. Apparently you are.

FOOT BALL!!!....'MERICA!!!!...WOOOOOOO!!!
http://lh5.ggpht.com/__zoKJ77EvEc/S8wPMyPxulI/AAAAAAAADiY/NDcXlhtxrss/football-fans%20(10).png

If my tax dollars help up the probability that the next bar skank I put my dick in gets regular screenings and a pill every day because they are easily accessible to her it's money well spent for me, for her, and society at large imo. Far better than floating some dumbshit jock his tuition and the multi million dollar phys ed program that supports an activity that will entertain me for all of maybe a cumulative 12-18 hrs a year entertaining me. Just sayin....healthy, clean, non impregnable pussy > sports...anything else is just gay.
 
You say "sexual activities" like it is a bad thing. Sexual activity is a part of a healthy lifestyle. Birth control is a part of health services. Do you oppose heath services for athletes? Why should you pay for health services for some guy who wants to play ball and gets injured.

I'm not some hypocritical puritan with a punishment fetish. Apparently you are.

1. Women want to decide when to a have sex (a good thing).
2. Women want to decide to when, if ever, to abort a pregnancy (I have no issue with this).

BUT, this College woman want others to pay for BC so they can have sex? That violates principle #1. This college woman is relinquishing her power.
 
1. Women want to decide when to a have sex (a good thing).
2. Women want to decide to when, if ever, to abort a pregnancy (I have no issue with this).

BUT, this College woman want others to pay for BC so they can have sex? That violates principle #1. This college woman is relinquishing her power.

BC is 20 bucks a month homie....the shot is about 30...going extreme and saying a woman spends 100 bucks a month on BC and other reproductive health services we are still only looking at 1200 bucks a year..toss in a couple check ups and we might hit 1600. That's a far cry from 3000 a year....someone stands to make a fuck load of money from this, if anything it should be criticized for the seemingly excessive cost (and who is pocketing the extra loot)....not the purpose of program itself.
 
BC is 20 bucks a month homie....the shot is about 30...going extreme and saying a woman spends 100 bucks a month on BC and other reproductive health services we are still only looking at 1200 bucks a year..toss in a couple check ups and we might hit 1600. That's a far cry from 3000 a year....someone stands to make a fuck load of money from this, if anything it should be criticized for the seemingly excessive cost (and who is pocketing the extra loot)....not the purpose of program itself.

$20? Ouch. Try $9/month :)

I’m certain if one really tried really hard, they could pay more than $3,000 for contraception during a three year period. But even if you are completely uninsured, Fluke and other female students can walk over to Target – with a prescription of course – and pick up contraception for $9 per month. John McCormack over at The Weekly Standard notes it costs more to buy two drinks at a Georgetown watering hole.

Link

Maybe Rush should have accused her of being a dumbass instead. I would not want this dumbass as my lawyer. Classic law school education that lacks math courses.

Now that the Libs were duped by this dumbass, I doubt that they'll come out in force and admit their misguided ways. Can't say I blame the Libs though. It was a great story: Woman wants everyone else to pay up to $3,000 per year so she can have sex, but ignore the facts w.r.t $ and instead jump on Rush.
 

I did not know that about that law.

Only in America can this happen (from your link):
Some Democratic lawmakers in Washington are pressing for new legislation by year’s end that would reverse the provision, which they say was inadvertently included in a law intended to reduce Medicaid abuse.

But students are not prisoners on campus. If they want to pay $9/month, they can go to Target.
 
In high school, coke bunnies (or coke whores) were girls that would have sex with a guy if the guy gave them cocaine. An exchange of sex for a product. Or thought of as another way, an incentive for the girl to have sex.

Flash forward to the College woman going to an ivy league school @ 24K per semester. Rush called her a slut (uncalled for). But using the same definition of what we used in high school, she would be a pill bunny, or pill whore. She claimed that in order to have sex, she needs the BC pills that someone, other than herself, had to supply.

So Rush deserves the drubbing because he knew better, but the woman is what she is.

'nuff said.


Republicans have always believed that birth control pills are a basic component of health care. Then they learned that Obama thought the same thing so they became against it.

Birth control pills are a basic part of health care because family planning is a basic part of health care. This is not an issue that's debated in the field of medicine or pharmacology.
 
Back
Top