zipman
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2002
- Posts
- 38,552
I think it's actually the third. I haven't heard about this case anywhere but Lit, so it must be making the rounds on Drudge and other arenas where the paranoids hang out.
Dressing up as "Zombie Muhammad" is clearly protected speech, and there's some evidence that the judge is deeply confused on this point, but that wasn't really the issue in this case. The notion that the judge invoked sharia in his acquittal is not supported by the facts. Period.
That pretty much sums it up perfectly.
But it's fun to watch the right-wingers get so bent out of shape about it.
