Republicans support Government seizure of property for corporate interests

[LJ_Reloaded]

Ishmael and his ilk will make excuses for this, if he has the balls to comment at all.

To hell with property rights... corporations are more people than you!

http://www.kansascity.com/2012/02/22/3444230/texas-becomes-battlefield-in-keystone.html

Texas becomes battlefield in Keystone XL pipeline fight
DAVE MONTGOMERY
The Fort Worth Star-Telegram

AUSTIN — The politically volatile Keystone XL pipeline is becoming embroiled in a widening controversy in Texas as supporters tout the promise of jobs and other economic benefits while increasingly vocal opponents say the project would trample property rights and endanger water supplies in East Texas.

Although President Barack Obama rejected the application by TransCanada, the pipeline company says it plans to resubmit its proposal to transport heavy crude oil from Canada to refineries in Texas. The project holds $2 billion of economic potential for Texas, more than for any other state, according to a survey commissioned by TransCanada.

Its high-profile supporters include Gov. Rick Perry and Sens. Kay Bailey Hutchison and John Cornyn, all Republicans. Perry made the pipeline an element of his failed presidential bid by blasting Obama's rejection of the application, accusing the president of squandering the chance to create jobs.

 

[Mike_Yates]

Ishmael and his ilk will make excuses for this, if he has the balls to comment at all.

To hell with property rights... corporations are more people than you!

http://www.kansascity.com/2012/02/22/3444230/texas-becomes-battlefield-in-keystone.html

Texas becomes battlefield in Keystone XL pipeline fight
DAVE MONTGOMERY
The Fort Worth Star-Telegram

AUSTIN — The politically volatile Keystone XL pipeline is becoming embroiled in a widening controversy in Texas as supporters tout the promise of jobs and other economic benefits while increasingly vocal opponents say the project would trample property rights and endanger water supplies in East Texas.

Although President Barack Obama rejected the application by TransCanada, the pipeline company says it plans to resubmit its proposal to transport heavy crude oil from Canada to refineries in Texas. The project holds $2 billion of economic potential for Texas, more than for any other state, according to a survey commissioned by TransCanada.

Its high-profile supporters include Gov. Rick Perry and Sens. Kay Bailey Hutchison and John Cornyn, all Republicans. Perry made the pipeline an element of his failed presidential bid by blasting Obama's rejection of the application, accusing the president of squandering the chance to create jobs.

The government (controlled wholly by giant corporations) wants to eliminate property rights so "big business" can forcibly take your land and property to weed out their competition and maximize their profits.

http://bostonoccupier.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/corporate_flag1.jpg

 

[ivantheterrible]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8ImPdMyppM&feature=player_embedded

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Where's property being seized?

 

[ivantheterrible]

everywhere , there gump. there are case after case in america where it has been done. in floriduh, property has been seized so that high priced high rises could be built.

did you even read and COMPREHEND the article?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

everywhere , there gump. there are case after case in america where it has been done. in floriduh, property has been seized so that high priced high rises could be built.

did you even read and COMPREHEND the article?

Kelo

Republicans fought long and hard against it.

Obama seized, in effect, property in KANSAS that had already been built as part of the pipeline ensuring that it is no a pipeline to nowhere...

Again, in this article, on this issue, what property is "Republicans" demanding to be seized?


When Government gets so powerful that its purchase price is cost effective, even imperative, to business, then business will purchase government indulgences.
A_J, the Stupid

 

[Wat_Tyler]

Gump's an expert on seized property in Kansas.


They have his horse, probably pulling a wagon.


The bloody Church of England
in chains of history
requests your earthly presence at
the vicarage for tea.

 

[ivantheterrible]

ignore whether someone wants to make it a repug/dumbocrat/indepoop issue. the main issue is that corporations will use government to take whatever they want from you.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Gump's an expert on seized property in Kansas.


They have his horse, probably pulling a wagon.


The bloody Church of England
in chains of history
requests your earthly presence at
the vicarage for tea.

It was up to me...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

ignore whether someone wants to make it a repug/dumbocrat/indepoop issue. the main issue is that corporations will use government to take whatever they want from you.

Only when you give it the power to do so, which is something the Democrats never argue against, they always want more government and then blame everyone else when it does not work they way they expected it to do when they gave it all the power they could vest in it in the name of SOcial Justice and Heaven here on Earth...


The answer was no; it [that their drug use was currently considered an illegal act by their own 'democratic' government] didn't bother them. It doesn't really bother anyone who accepts mob rule as a desirable form of social organization. The reason is that democrats never regard existing democracy as their preferred political system — they regard it only as a transitory state to a democratic utopia in which the elected leaders will agree totally with their own values and social-political views. Mises has observed that "the critics of the capitalistic order always seem to believe that the socialistic system of their dreams will do precisely what they think correct." Hence, when people talk about the importance of democracy, it is never democracy as it has ever actually functioned, with the politicians that have actually been elected, and the policies that have actually been implemented. It is always democracy as people imagine it will operate once they succeed in electing "the right people" — by which they mean, people who agree almost completely with their own views, and who are consistent and incorruptible in their implementation of the resulting policies. This is what allows an intelligent group of people to espouse mob rule as a desirable principle, even as they simultaneously commit acts that brand them as criminals worthy of imprisonment under the very social system they maintain.
Ben O'Neill
http://mises.org/daily/5879/Worship-of-the-Mob

 

[Wat_Tyler]

It was up to me...

In the end, I prefer my fudge to be loose.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Add fava to your liver...

 

[Wat_Tyler]

I'll stick to mah grits, thankyouverramuch.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Corniest post of the morning!



*spit*

 

[Wat_Tyler]

Mind you keep that poultice moist.


There's blood in yer spit.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Working on a new Brown...



Spiiiiiiiiit

 

[Wat_Tyler]

What the world needs now is a new . . .


James Brown.


like la la la la la la la laaaaaaaaaaaaa

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I FEEL Good!



I knew that I would. So good, so good!