What happened to all of the doom and gloom economic threads?

[richard_daily]

Time for the latest installment in the ongoing saga of "Bitchslap the Half Breed"

Congressional Budget Office...come on down! you're our next contestant!

CBO Data Show Tax Cuts Have Played Much Larger Role than Domestic Spending Increases in Fueling the Deficit

And here's a very pretty graphic for the Chief to ignore!
http://www.cbpp.org/archivesite/1-25-05bud-f1.jpg

B-b-b-b-b-but... HE'S A MARXIST!!!!!

 

[RobDownSouth]

B-b-b-b-b-but... HE'S A MARXIST!!!!!

And a FASCIST too, or so I'm told. Only on odd numbered days though.

 

[richard_daily]

And a FASCIST too, or so I'm told. Only on odd numbered days though.

Plus he's a Kenyan... And "the most liberal president EVER".

Seriously!

 

[mercury14]

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/280288/TAX-CUTS-DEBT.jpg

 

[mercury14]

The unfunded Bush tax cuts are the single largest contributor to the US national debt.

How come the Bush tax cut didn't need to be funded and the comparatively tiny Obama payroll tax cut does?

Bump for AJ.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The Bush tax cuts cost what, fifteen times Obama's payroll tax cut? Just guessing here and it's probably much more. How come only Obama's cut needs to be funded?

Answer the question, hypocrite.

A_J's corollary #5, “When lacking reason and sound argument, the New Age Liberal charges headlong into ‘debate’ with emotional cries of Hypocrisy. The New Age Liberal is, of course, immune to and incapable of Hypocrisy. That would require hard and fast standards.”

Well, as stated, all he did was give the untaxed a premium break.

That means he's trying to stimulate the unproductive class with the common fallacy that all spending is good spending. He, I repeat, has already twice acknowledged that the Bush-era tax rates are beneficial to an economy. In short, they did not cost more, they earned more because the created more revenue by stimulating the producers.

All Obama has done is create more debt and pushed it out on the horizon past his next election in order to gain favor with his class of voters and if he had sane energy policies, it had a chance to work, but when your premium savings goes straight to your gas tank and heating bill, then his voter feels not one wit more enriched, he changes not his spending patterns and the money is not going into the general economy.

But you know that. You just want the guy reelected so you will say, or do anything, to make him look like an economic wonk instead of a Social Justice Warrior. He knows how to stimulate an economy, but he thinks that it is unfair and unfair, to him, is more important than "the rich getting richer."

He doesn't give a shit about a rising tide floating all boats; he want to sink yachts.

His voters love that crap...

 

[Beco]

Plus he's a Kenyan... And "the worst liberal president EVER".

Seriously!

Thats about right....

 

[RobDownSouth]

A_J's corollary #5, “When lacking reason and sound argument, the New Age Liberal charges headlong into ‘debate’ with emotional cries of Hypocrisy. The New Age Liberal is, of course, immune to and incapable of Hypocrisy. That would require hard and fast standards.”

Well, as stated, all he did was give the untaxed a premium break.

That means he's trying to stimulate the unproductive class with the common fallacy that all spending is good spending. He, I repeat, has already twice acknowledged that the Bush-era tax rates are beneficial to an economy. In short, they did not cost more, they earned more because the created more revenue by stimulating the producers.

All Obama has done is create more debt and pushed it out on the horizon past his next election in order to gain favor with his class of voters and if he had sane energy policies, it had a chance to work, but when your premium savings goes straight to your gas tank and heating bill, then his voter feels not one wit more enriched, he changes not his spending patterns and the money is not going into the general economy.

But you know that. You just want the guy reelected so you will say, or do anything, to make him look like an economic wonk instead of a Social Justice Warrior. He knows how to stimulate an economy, but he thinks that it is unfair and unfair, to him, is more important than "the rich getting richer."

He doesn't give a shit about a rising tide floating all boats; he want to sink yachts.

His voters love that crap...

Shorter A.J.: That....That...THAT'S DIFFERENT!

 

[NeverEndingMe]

B-b-b-b-b-but... HE'S A MARXIST!!!!!

you just don't fucking get it do you. over 50% of America will not pay income tax. what is the obama goal to reach 80% of America not paying income tax?

what happened to paying "their fair share"? dosn't that inclue your welfare mother? oh wait, you and your kind would rather sit on your lazy ass collecting checks.

point is, you can jack up income tax on the 1% but the way that obama is spending will not matter.

ALL entitlments have to be cut. its a fucking fact.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

Plus he's a Kenyan... And "the most liberal president EVER".

Seriously!

correction, obama is the biggest fucking loser shit head of a president

 

[richard_daily]

you just don't fucking get it do you. over 50% of America will not pay income tax. what is the obama goal to reach 80% of America not paying income tax?

what happened to paying "their fair share"? dosn't that inclue your welfare mother? oh wait, you and your kind would rather sit on your lazy ass collecting checks.

point is, you can jack up income tax on the 1% but the way that obama is spending will not matter.

ALL entitlments have to be cut. its a fucking fact.

The rich ARE an entitlement.

 

[mercury14]

A_J's corollary #5, “When lacking reason and sound argument, the New Age Liberal charges headlong into ‘debate’ with emotional cries of Hypocrisy. The New Age Liberal is, of course, immune to and incapable of Hypocrisy. That would require hard and fast standards.”

Well, as stated, all he did was give the untaxed a premium break.

That means he's trying to stimulate the unproductive class with the common fallacy that all spending is good spending. He, I repeat, has already twice acknowledged that the Bush-era tax rates are beneficial to an economy. In short, they did not cost more, they earned more because the created more revenue by stimulating the producers.

All Obama has done is create more debt and pushed it out on the horizon past his next election in order to gain favor with his class of voters and if he had sane energy policies, it had a chance to work, but when your premium savings goes straight to your gas tank and heating bill, then his voter feels not one wit more enriched, he changes not his spending patterns and the money is not going into the general economy.

But you know that. You just want the guy reelected so you will say, or do anything, to make him look like an economic wonk instead of a Social Justice Warrior. He knows how to stimulate an economy, but he thinks that it is unfair and unfair, to him, is more important than "the rich getting richer."

He doesn't give a shit about a rising tide floating all boats; he want to sink yachts.

His voters love that crap...

I asked you why the Bush tax cuts didn't have to be paid for and you go and respond by hardly even mentioning them? WTF is wrong with you Mr. Logic cop? These non-sequiturs are getting old as shit.

Start over at the beginning. Why don't the Bush tax cuts need to be paid for?

 

[mercury14]

Well, as stated, all he did was give the untaxed a premium break.

^^^
Dumbfuckery that I'm just going to let slide for now.

 

[RobDownSouth]

I asked you why the Bush tax cuts didn't have to be paid for and you go and respond by hardly even mentioning them? WTF is wrong with you Mr. Logic cop? These non-sequiturs are getting old.

Start over at the beginning. Why don't the Bush tax cuts need to be paid for?

<aj mode>
ummm....Reverend Wright!
Solyndra!
ALINSKY!!
</aj mode>

 

[mercury14]

<aj mode>
ummm....Reverend Wright!
Solyndra!
ALINSKY!!
</aj mode>

You forgot TELEPROMPTERS %$*&$

 

[VoteForMe]

There's so many charts in here it makes my head spin. Karl, get over here--tell me what these charts are about. Comeon RoverDover, earn your pay.

 

[koalabear]

The rich ARE an entitlement.

^^^
Dumbfuckery that I'm just going to let slide for now.

<aj mode>
ummm....Reverend Wright!
Solyndra!
ALINSKY!!
</aj mode>

Proof why you should never change the fan belt why the engine is running.

 

[phrodeau]

I asked you why the Bush tax cuts didn't have to be paid for and you go and respond by hardly even mentioning them? WTF is wrong with you Mr. Logic cop? These non-sequiturs are getting old as shit.

Start over at the beginning. Why don't the Bush tax cuts need to be paid for?

Well, it looks like he did, and it's simple logic.

Cut taxes to the rich, and they invest more, industry increases, jobs get created, and more tax revenue comes in because of it.

That's tax revenue from the workers, to be clear. The rich simply get richer.

 

[koalabear]

Well, it looks like he did, and it's simple logic.

Cut taxes to the rich, and they invest more, industry increases, jobs get created, and more tax revenue comes in because of it.

That's tax revenue from the workers, to be clear. The rich simply get richer.

Proof why you should never change the fan belt why the engine is running. Part two.

 

[phrodeau]

Proof why you should never change the fan belt why the engine is running. Part two.

Was there something you didn't understand?

 

[koalabear]

Was there something you didn't understand?

^^^ Part three, some morons are slower than others.

 

[unregistered]

 

[NeverEndingMe]

The rich ARE an entitlement.

oh bull shit! we have what, 50% not paying any type of income tax. that is the problem.

we have too many American's sitting back collecting unemployment and obama is pushing this type of behavior. can't think of a bigger disappointment and an epic fail than obama

under obama, those who believe in that idiot, have ZERO pride

 

[Dribble]

If there were a 50% chance of getting electrocuted by turning on the lights those four fucks wouldn't think twice.

lost another argument again huh?

 

[NeverEndingMe]

Well, it looks like he did, and it's simple logic.

Cut taxes to the rich, and they invest more, industry increases, jobs get created, and more tax revenue comes in because of it.

That's tax revenue from the workers, to be clear. The rich simply get richer.

what, give obama more money so that we can offer more entitlements? welfare and unemployment checks are not a valid career path

jesus, your kind of people are so flipping lazy and feel entitled